Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 6

Forecasting ozone threshold exceedances in urban background areas using supervised classification and easy-access information

Pages
1052–1061
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The use of these models to forecast background O3 threshold exceedances are encouraged due to the performances obtained and to their easy reproducibility.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Classification models to forecast exceedance of the ozone (O3) threshold established by European legislation are rare in literature, as is the focus on background O3, with higher concentrations at city outskirts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study evaluated the performance of nine classifiers to forecast this threshold exceedance by background O3.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The use of these models to forecast background O3 threshold exceedances are encouraged due to the performances obtained and to their easy reproducibility.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2006–2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Classification models to forecast exceedance of the ozone (O3) threshold established by European legislation are rare in literature, as is the focus on background O3, with higher concentrations at city outskirts. This study evaluated the performance of nine classifiers to forecast this threshold exceedance by background O3. Models used five large hourly background O3 data sets (2006–2015), and included temporal features describing the O3 formation dynamic. Bagging and stacking ensembles of such classifiers and their cost of learning were also evaluated. C5.0 and nnet classifiers achieved the best forecasting performance, even at imbalanced learning. Bagging ensembles outperformed stacking approaches, although with little accuracy improvement as compared to classifiers. The cost of learning evidenced similar performance results from reduced fractions of original data sets. The use of these models to forecast background O3 threshold exceedances are encouraged due to the performances obtained and to their easy reproducibility.

🔖

Cite This Article

LOSADA, Á. G. (2018). Forecasting ozone threshold exceedances in urban background areas using supervised classification and easy-access information. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 6, 1052–1061. https://ajindex.com/articles/213730

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adame, J.A., Lozano, A., Bolívar, J.P., de la Morena, B.A., Contreras, J., Godoy, F., 2008. Behavior, distribution and variability of surface ozone at an arid region in the south of Iberian Peninsula (Seville, Spain). Chemosphere 70, 841–849.
  2. Al-Abri, E.S., 2016. Modelling Atmospheric Ozone Concentration Using Machine Learning Algorithms. PhD dissertation, retrieved from Loughborough Institutional Repository. Loughborough University. Breiman, L., 1996. Bagging predictors. Mach. Learn. 24 (2), 123–140.
  3. Corani, G., Scanagatta, M., 2016. Air pollution prediction via multi-label classification. Environ. Modell. Softw. 80, 259–264.
  4. Debry, E., Mallet, V., 2014. Ensemble forecasting with machine learning algorithms for ozone, nitrogen dioxide and PM10 on the Prev'Air platform. Atmos. Environ. 91, 71–84.
  5. Derwent, R.G., Hjellbrekke, A.G., 2012. Air pollution by ozone across Europe. In: Viana, M. (Ed.), Urban Air Quality in Europe. Springer-Verlag, Berling Heidelberg, pp. 55–73.
  6. Dietterich, T.G., 1998. Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms. Neural Comput. 7 (10), 1895–1924.
  7. Dietterich, T.G., 2000. Ensemble methods in machine learning. In: Kittler, J., Roli, F. (Eds.), Multiple Classifier Systems. MCS 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, Berling Heidelberg, pp. 55–73. Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe. Drummond, C., Holte, R.C., 2003. C4.5, Class Imbalance, and Cost Sensitivity: Why Under-sampling Beats Over-sampling. pp. 1–8.
  8. Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.J., 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York. Figueroa, R.L., Zeng-Treitler, Q., Kandula, S., Ngo, L.H., 2012. Predicting sample size required for classification performance. BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Mak. 12, 1–10.
  9. Flach, P., 2012. Machine Learning. The Art and Science of Algorithms that Make Sense of Data. Cambridge University Press,
  10. Cambridge. Gong, B., Ordieres-Meré, 2016. Prediction of daily maximum ozone threshold exceedances by preprocessing and ensemble artificial intelligence techniques: case study of Hong Kong. Environ. Model. Softw. 84, 290–303.
  11. Haixiang, G., Yijinga, L., Shangd, J., Mingyuna, G., Yuanyuea, H., Bing, G., 2017. Learning from class-imbalanced data: review of methods and applications. Expert Syst. Appl. 73, 220–239.
  12. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J., 2009. The Elements of Statistical Learning Data Mini