Journals / Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

Feeding Behaviors of The Tydeid Mites

Tydeid’lerin (Acari: Tydeoidea) Beslenme Alışkanlıkları

Pages
1–5
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Because of the many possible food habits of the Tydeidae, it is necessary to evaluate feeding behaviors of Tydeid at species level.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Tydeidae feed largely on fungi and decaying materyals, although some are known to be predacious on insects and mites and a few have been reported to damage plants.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Some species are facultative predators and others can be important bio-control agents of plant parasitic mites.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Because of the many possible food habits of the Tydeidae, it is necessary to evaluate feeding behaviors of Tydeid at species level.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tydeidae · akar · beslenme

Abstract

Tydeidae feed largely on fungi and decaying materyals, although some are known to be predacious on insects and mites and a few have been reported to damage plants. Some species are facultative predators and others can be important bio-control agents of plant parasitic mites. The feeding behavior of tydeid mites is highly diverse and species have been identified as being predacious e.g. Homeopronematus anconai (Baker). Some species feeds on honeydew such as Lorryia formosa Cooreman and other species can be fungivorous and feed on conidia and mycelia of fungi such as Orthotydeus lambi (Baker) on Erysiphe necator Schwein (causal agent of grape powdery mildew). Because of the many possible food habits of the Tydeidae, it is necessary to evaluate feeding behaviors of Tydeid at species level.

Özet

Tydeidae familyası türlerinin bazıları bitki zararlısı, bazılarının ise böcek ve akarlar üzerinde predatör olduğu bilinmesine rağmen büyük bir çoğunluğu funguslar ve çürümekte olan artıklar üzerinde beslenirler. Bazı türleri fakültatif predatör iken bazıları bitki paraziti akarların kontrolünde kullanılabilecek önemli bir biyolojik kontrol etmeni olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Tydeid’lerin beslenme davranışları yüksek oranda varyasyon göstermekte olup, Homeopronematus anconai (Baker), gibi bazı türler predatördür. Lorryia formosa Cooreman gibi bazı türler afit ve benzeri böceklerin salgılarında beslenirken funguslarla beslenen türlerde bulunmakta olup, Orthotydeus lambi (Baker) bağ küllemesi etmeni Erysiphe necator Schwein’un konidiospor ve miselyumlarında beslenmektedir. Tydeid’lerin çok çeşitli beslenme alışkanlıklarına sahip olmaları bu grubun beslenme davranışlarını tür düzeyinde inceleme gereğini ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

YANAR, D., ERDOĞAN, H., YANAR, Y. (2013). Feeding Behaviors of The Tydeid Mites. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 1–5. https://ajindex.com/articles/213626

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aguilar HC, Childers C and Welbourn WC (2001). Relative abundance and seasonal occurrence of mites in the family Tydeidae on citrus in Florida, pp. 376-380.
  2. In R. B. Halliday, D. E. Walter H. C.Proctor, R. A. Norton, and M. J. Colloff (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Acarology. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, Australia. Badii MH, Flores AE, Ponce G, Landeros J and Quiroz H (2001). Does the Lorryia formosa Cooreman (Acari: Prostigmata: Tydeidae) population visit or reside on citrus foliage? Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Acarology. CSIRO Pub, pp. 413–418.
  3. Bayan A (1986). Tydeid mites associated with apples in Lebanon (Acari:Actinedida: Tydeidae). Acarologia, Paris, 27 (4): 311-316.
  4. Brodeur J, Bouchard A, Turcotte, G, (1997). Potential of four species of predatory mites as biological control agents of the tomato russet mite, Aculops lycopersici (Massee) (Eriophyidae). Can. Entomol. 129, 1–6.
  5. Camporese P, Duso C (1995). Life history and life table parameters of the predatory mite Typhlodromus talbii. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 77, 149–157.
  6. Carmona MM and Siva-Dias JC (1996). Fundamentos de Acarologia Agricola. Fandaçao calouste Gulbemkian, Lisboan. Castagnoli M (1989). Recent advances in knowledge of the mite fauna in the biocenoses of grapevine in Italy. In: Cavalloro, R. (Ed.), Influence of Environmental Factors on the Control of Grape Pests, Diseases and Weeds. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 169–180.
  7. English-Loeb G, Norton AP, Gadoury DM, Seem RC, Wilcox WF (1999). Control of powdery mildew in wild and cultivated grapes by a tydeid mite. Biol. Contr. 14, 97–103.
  8. English-Loeb G, Norton A P, Gadoury D, Seem R and Wilcox W (2007). Biological control of grape powdery mildew using mycophagous mites. Plant Dis. 91:421-429.
  9. Ferreira MA and Carmona MM (1994). Acarofauna do feijoeiro em Portugal. Bol. San. Veg. Plagas. 20: 111-118
  10. Flechtmann CHW, Kreiter S, Etienne J and De Moraes GJ (1999). Plant mites (Acari) of the French Antilles. 2. Tarsonomidae and Tydeidae (Prostigmata). Acarologia 40:145-146. Garcia-Marı´ F, Marzal C, Laborda R (1985). Tideidos (Acari: Actinedida) que viven en los cı´tricos cultivados en Espan˜ a: especies presentes y dina´mica poblacional. Actas do II Congresso Ibe´rico de Entomologia, Lisboa. Suplemento ao Boletim da Sociedade Portuguesa de Entomologia. 199–207.
  11. Görür G (2008). Türkiye afit faunasının son durumu ve afitlerin ekonomik önemi. Türk Bilimsel Derlemeler Dergisi. 1(1):17-22.
  12. Hessein NA, Perring TM (19