Journals / Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

Assessment of winter survival in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes using molecular markers and some physiological traits

Pages
45–54
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed negative significant correlation (-0.601) between field survival index and LT50.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:To evaluate the freezing resistance and genetic diversity in barley physiological traits, molecular markers and their relationship in 20 barley genotypes were assessed in field and greenhouse condition.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The analysis of variance showed a significant difference among studied genotypes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed negative significant correlation (-0.601) between field survival index and LT50.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

To evaluate the freezing resistance and genetic diversity in barley physiological traits, molecular markers and their relationship in 20 barley genotypes were assessed in field and greenhouse condition. The analysis of variance showed a significant difference among studied genotypes. The effect of acclimation temperature on prolin content, quantum efficiency of photosystem II, chlorophyll and soluble sugars content were studied as physiological traits. Freezing treatments were -4, -7, -10, -13 and -16°C temperatures that applied in a 3 replicated randomized complete block design. Then their lethal temperature at which 50% of plant were died (LT50) was determined. To estimate FSI (Field Survival Index) index, the 20 genotypes were cultured in a separate experiment on field with 3 replications. The results showed negative significant correlation (-0.601) between field survival index and LT50. Cluster analysis using physiological traits, genotypes of F-A1-1, F-A1-2, F-A2-11, F- GRB-85-5, Sahra, Sahand, Dasht and Makouei were categorized in a distinct group and had a high FSI and low LT50. Makouei cultivar having LT50=-17.66°C and the highest percentage of winter survival in the field, was the most resistant genotype. 10 ISSR markers from 35 primers sequences were selected and used. These 9 ISSR primers produced 50 polymorphic bands. PIC and MI average index for all primers were 0.37 and 1.72 respectively. Cluster analysis of molecular data using Jaccard similarity coefficient categorized the genotypes to four distinct groups. Associations between molecular markers and traits were assessed by multiple regression analysis. Some informative markers related to FSI and also LT50 was determined. So it may be possible to use these markers for selection of resistant lines or genotypes in breeding programs.

🔖

Cite This Article

SOFALIAN, O., BEHI, M. (2013). Assessment of winter survival in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes using molecular markers and some physiological traits. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 45–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/213622

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID (1973). Rapid determination of free prolin for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil, 39: 205- 207. Bhardway R and Singhal G (1981). Effect of water stress on photochemical activity of chloroplasts during greening etiolated barley seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol, 22: 155- 162. Breton G, Danyaluk J, Ouellet F, Sarhan F (2000). Biotechnological application of plant freezing associated proteins. Biotechnol. Ann Rev, 6: 57-82.
  2. Bridger GM, Falk DE, Mc Kersie BD, Smith DL (1996). Crown freezing tolerance and field winter survival of winter cereals in Eastern Canada. Crop Sci, 35: 150- 157. Fernandez ME, Figueiras AM, Benito C (2002). The use of ISSR and RAPD markers for detecting DNA polymorphism, genotype identification and genetics diversity among barly cultivars whith known origin. Theor Appl Genet, 104: 845- 851. Fowler DB (1982). Date of seedling, fall growth and winter survival of winter wheat and rye. Agron J, 74: 1060- 1063. Fowler DB (2002). Winter Cereal Production. Crop Development Center, University of Saskatchewan, Canada. URL:http://www.usask.ca/agriculture/cropsci/winter_cer eals/. Fowler DB, Gusta LV, Tyler NJ (1981). Selection for winter hardiness in wheat. III. Screening methods. Crop Sci, 21: 896- 900. Gebhardt C, Ballvora A, Walkemeier B, Oberhagemann P, Schuler K (2004)Assessing genetic potential in germplasm collections of crop plants by marker-trait association: A case study for potatoes with quantitative variation of resistance to late blight and maturity type. Mol Breed, 13: 93-102.
  3. Gusta LV, Fowler DB, Tyler NJ (1982). Factors influencing hardening and survival in winter wheat. In: Li PH, Sakai A (eds) Plant cold hardiness and freezing stress: mechanisms and crop implication Academic New York 2:23–40.
  4. Irigoyen JJ, Emerich DW, Sanchez-Diaz M (1992). Water stress induced changes in concentrations of proline and total soluble sugars in nodulated alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) plants. Physiol Plant, 84: 55-60.
  5. Lander ES and Botstein D (1987). Mapping mandelian factors underlying quantitative trait using RFLP linkage maps. Genet, 121: 179-186.
  6. Limin AE and Fowler DB (1988). Cold hardiness expression in interspecific hybrids and amphiploids of the Triticeae. Genome, 30: 361- 365. Livingston DP and Premakumar R (2002). Apoplastic carbohydrates do not account for differences in freezing tolerance of two winter oat cultivars that have been second phase cold hardened. Cereal research Commun, 30: 375- 381. Mahfoozi S, Ro