Journals / Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Bilimleri Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4

Eklem hareket kısıtlamasının normal deneklerde performansa etkileri ve bunların omurilik yaralı hastalarda ortez geliştirmeye katkıları

Influences of joint motion restriction on the performance of normal subjects and their implications on development of orthosis for spinal cord injured individuals

Pages
122–131
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The performance of the subjects in walking with the new design of the RGO orthosis was better than that with the HGO orthosis.(J PMR Sci 2010;13:122-31)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Different types of orthoses have been designed for paraplegic subjects in order to enable them to walk again.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The functional performance of normal subjects was evaluated while standing and walking with the new orthosis with different hip joint configurations and was compared with that of the Hip Guidance Orthosis (HGO).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The performance of the subjects in walking with the new design of the RGO orthosis was better than that with the HGO orthosis.(J PMR Sci 2010;13:122-31)
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Different types of orthoses have been designed for paraplegic subjects in order to enable them to walk again. However, patients experience some problems in donning and doffing the orthosis and expend high energy during walking. Methods: A new type of Reciprocal Gait Orthosis (RGO) was designed to solve some of the problems of the previous orthoses. The functional performance of normal subjects was evaluated while standing and walking with the new orthosis with different hip joint configurations and was compared with that of the Hip Guidance Orthosis (HGO). Results: The results of this research study showed that the performance of the new orthosis can be better than that of the HGO orthosis. Moreover, it has no medial thigh bars and it is much easier for the subjects to donn and doff the orthosis independently. Conclusion: The performance of the subjects in walking with the new design of the RGO orthosis was better than that with the HGO orthosis.(J PMR Sci 2010;13:122-31)

Özet

Amaç: Paraplejik hastaların tekrar yürüyebilmesi için farklı tipte ortezler tasarlanmıştır. Ancak hastalar ortezleri giyip çıkarmak konusunda bazı problemler yaşamakta ve yürüme sırasında çok fazla enerji harcamaktadırlar. Bu çalışmada daha önce kullanılan ortezlerin problemlerini çözmek amacıyla yeni bir resiprokal yürüme ortazi (RYO) tasarlandı ve kalça yönelimli ortezle karşılaştırıldı. Yöntem: Normal deneklerin fonksiyonel performansı farklı kalça eklem konfigürasyonlarında ayakta durma ve yürüme sırasında değerlendirildi ve kalça yönelimli ortezle (KYO) karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Bu araştırmanın sonuçları yeni ortezin performansının KYO’dan daha iyi olabileceğini gösterdi. Ek olarak bu ortezin medial uyluk barı yoktur ve denekler tarafından giyilip çıkarılabilmesi daha kolaydır. Sonuç: Yeni tasarlanan RYO ile deneklerin yürüme performansları KYO’den daha iyiydi. Paraplejik hastalarda bu yeni ortezi uygunluğunun araştırılması gereklidir. (FTR Bil Der 2010;13:122-31)

🔖

Cite This Article

KARIMI, M. (2010). Eklem hareket kısıtlamasının normal deneklerde performansa etkileri ve bunların omurilik yaralı hastalarda ortez geliştirmeye katkıları. Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4, 122–131. https://ajindex.com/articles/213594

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Jefferson RJ, Whittle MW. Performance of three walking orthoses for the paralysed: a case study using gait analysis. Prosthet Orthot Int 1990;14:103-10
  2. Whittle MW, Cochrane GM, Chase AP et al. A comparative trial of two walking systems for paralysed people. Paraplegia 1991;29:97-102
  3. Stallard J, Major RE. A review of reciprocal walking systems for paraplegic patients: factors affecting choice and economic justification. Prosthet Orthot Int 1998;22:240-7
  4. Scivoletto G, Mancini M, Fiorelli E, Morganti B, Molinari M. A prototype of an adjustable advanced reciprocating gait orthosis (ARGO) for spinal cord injury (SCI). Spinal Cord 2003;41:187-91
  5. Ohta Y, Yano H, Suzuki R, Yoshida M, Kawashima N, Nakazawa K. A two-degree-of-freedom motor-powered gait orthosis for spinal cord injury patients. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2007;221:629-39
  6. Dall PM, Muller B, Stallard I, Edwards J, Granat MH. The functional use of the reciprocal hip mechanism during gait for paraplegic patients walking in the Louisiana State University reciprocating gait orthosis. Prosthet Orthot Int 1999;23:152-62
  7. Cuddeford TJ, Freeling RP, Thomas SS et al. Energy consumption in children with myelomeningocele: a comparison between reciprocating gait orthosis and hip-knee-ankle-foot orthosis ambulators. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl 1997;39:239-42
  8. Greene PJ, Granat MH. A knee and ankle flexing hybrid orthosis for paraplegic ambulation. Med Eng Phys 2003;25:539-45
  9. Kagawa T, Fukuda H, Uno Y. Stability analysis of paraplegic standing while wearing an orthosis. Med Biol Eng Comput 2006;44:907-17
  10. Baardman G, Ijzerman MJ, Hermens HJ, Veltink PH, Boom HB, Zilvold G. The influence of the reciprocal hip joint link in the Advanced Reciprocating Gait Orthosis on standing performance in paraplegia. Prosthet Orthot Int 1997;21:210-21
  11. Shimada Y, Hatakeyama K, Minato T et al. Hybrid functional electrical stimulation with medial linkage knee-ankle-foot orthoses in complete paraplegics. Tohoku J Exp Med 2006;209:117-23
  12. Yano H, Kaneko S, Nakazawa K, Yamamoto SI, Bettoh A. A new concept of dynamic orthosis for paraplegia: the weight bearing control (WBC) orthosis. Prosthet Orthot Int 1997;21:222-8
  13. Genda E, Oota K, Suzuki Y, Koyama K, Kasahara T. A new walking orthosis for paraplegics: hip and ankle linkage system. Prosthet Orthot Int 2004;28:69-74
  14. Dall PM. The function of orthotic hip and knee joints during gait for individuals with thoracic level spinal cord injury [Thes