AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightCONCLUSIONThe analysis of corrosion behavior may be useful to select the right stent fulfilling the individual needs of the patient within a large number of different stents.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical cases of stent-fractures show that corrosion behavior might play a role in these fractures. Implanted in vivo, especially in combination with other implanted foreign materials, these metallic products are exposed to special conditions, which can cause a process of corrosion. Here, we aimed to test the corrosion potential of stents made of different materials in an in vitro setting. METHODSA total of 28 peripheral stents of different materials (nitinol, cobalt-chromium-nickel, tantalum, V4A) and surface treatments (electropolish, mechanical polish, no polish) were tested in vitro. Corrosion was accelerated by applying a constant voltage of 3.5 V and amperage of 1.16 mA in 0.9% NaCl. RESULTSNitinol stents showed the lowest susceptibility to corrosion and the longest period without dam-age. The Memotherm II® (BARD Angiomed®) was the only stent that showed neither macroscop-ic nor microscopic damages. The worst performing material was cobalt-chromium-nickel, which showed corrosion damages about ten times earlier compared to nitinol. Considering the reasons for termination of the test, nitinol stents primarily showed length deficits, while V4A and tantalum stents showed fractures. Cobalt-chromium-nickel stents had multiple fractures or a complete lysis in equal proportions. When placed in direct contact, nitinol stents showed best corrosion resis-tance, regardless of what material they were combined with. In terms of polishing treatments, elec-tropolished stents performed the best, mechanical-polished stents and those without polishing treatment followed. CONCLUSIONThe analysis of corrosion behavior may be useful to select the right stent fulfilling the individual needs of the patient within a large number of different stents.