SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Turkish Science Education / 2010 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Evaluating the science activities based on multiple intelligence theory

SEVİLAY KARAMUSTAFAOĞLU
Pages
3–12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Suggestions about the results of the study were presented.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to evaluate the activities that student teachers developed for primary education science and technology subjects according to the Multiple Intelligence Theory (MIT).
📊
Key Findings & Data:During the research, with the guidance of the instructor, it was discussed with student teachers how multiple intelligence activities are developed on science and technology subject. ‘Activity Evaluation Scale on MIT’ was developed considering the skills of the student teachers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Suggestions about the results of the study were presented.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study was carried out to evaluate the activities that student teachers developed for primary education science and technology subjects according to the Multiple Intelligence Theory (MIT). In this research, document analysis method was used. During the research, with the guidance of the instructor, it was discussed with student teachers how multiple intelligence activities are developed on science and technology subject. ‘Activity Evaluation Scale on MIT’ was developed considering the skills of the student teachers. Content validity of the scale was carried out by the subject education experts and structural validity was carried out by factor analysis. The analysis of the data was made by evaluating these activities. Data showed that the student teachers couldn’t acquire the expected behaviors. Suggestions about the results of the study were presented.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAMUSTAFAOĞLU, S. (2010). Evaluating the science activities based on multiple intelligence theory. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 3–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/213257

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Açıkgöz, K.Ü. (2003).
  2. Etkili Öğrenme ve Öğretme, Eğitim Dünyası Yayınları,
  3. İzmir.
  4. Al-Balhan, E. M. (2006). Multiple Intelligence Styles in Relation to Improved Academic Performance in Kuwaiti Middle School Reading. Digest of Middle East Studies, 15(1), 18-34.
  5. Barlow, R. (1999). Statistics: a guide to the use of statistical methods in the physical sciences, John Wiley and Sons. Bell, J. (1987). Doing Your Research Project A guide for the First-Time Researchers in Education and Social Science, Open University Press,
  6. England. Blythe, T. & Gardner, H. (1990). A school for all intelligences. Educational Leadership, 47, 33-37.
  7. Campell, B. (1989). Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom, New Horizons for Learning's On The Beam, 9(2), 7-167.
  8. Champell, L. (1997). How Teachers Interpret MI Theory. Educational Leadership, 55(1), 8- 13. Çepni, S., Ayas, A., Akdeniz, A.R., Özmen, H., Yiğit, N. & Ayvacı, H.Ş. (2007). Kuramdan Uygulamaya Fen ve Teknoloji Öğretimi, Pegem A Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  9. Fellow, N. J. (1994). A Window into Thinking: Using Student Writing to Understand Conceptual Change in Science Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 985-1001.
  10. Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in Practice, Basic Boks, A Division of Harper Collins Publishers, New York,USA. Goodnough, K. (2001). Multiple Intelligences Theory: a Framework Personalizing Science Curricula. School Science & Mathematics, 101(4), 180-194.
  11. Guss, F.G. (2005). Dramatic playing beyond the theory of multiple intelligences. Research in Drama Education. 10(1), 43-54.
  12. Güven, S., (2006). Öğretim Teknolojileri ve Materyal Geliştirme Dersinin Kazandırdığı Yeterlilikler Yönünden Değerlendirilmesi: (Inönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Örneği), Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(2), 165-179.
  13. Karamustafaoğlu, O. & Yaman, S. (2006). Fen Eğitiminde Özel Öğretim Yöntemleri I-II, Anı Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  14. Karamustafaoğlu, O. & Akdeniz, A. R. (2005). Evaluation of physics teacher canditates’ activities in teaching methods courses, Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 18, 236-252.
  15. Karamustafaoğlu, S. & Ayas, A. (2004). Analojilerle Bazı Kimya Kavramlarının Öğretiminin Bilişsel ve Duyuşsal Öğrenmelere Etkisi, VI. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi Bildiler Kitabı, 9-11 Eylül, 424-429.
  16. Karamustafaoğlu, S. (2003). ‘Maddenin İç Yapısına Yolculuk’ Ünitesi İle İlgili Basit Araç- Gereçlere Dayalı Rehber Materyal Geliştirilmesi ve Öğretim Sürecindeki Etkiliği, KTÜ Fen Bilimleri E