Journals / Journal of Eta Maritime Science / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Is Existing Maintenance System Adequate for Sulphur 2020 Amendments?

Pages
302–308
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Lastly, discussions and suggestions have been provided to the ship owners and technical managements.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Sulphur 2020 regulation as a reduction of sulphur emissions has been caused a big challenge via using new fuels in the maritime industry.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Consistent changes in the chemical and physical properties of these new fuels make classical maintenance methods as brake down or planned inadequate and endanger operational and navigational safety on ships.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Lastly, discussions and suggestions have been provided to the ship owners and technical managements.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Sulphur 2020 regulation as a reduction of sulphur emissions has been caused a big challenge via using new fuels in the maritime industry. Consistent changes in the chemical and physical properties of these new fuels make classical maintenance methods as brake down or planned inadequate and endanger operational and navigational safety on ships. Within this framework, ship maintenance systems need to be reevaluated in accordance with the new marine fuels. In this study, firstly impacts of new marine fuels on ships have been evaluated by means of a literature review. Furthermore, repair and maintenance systems have been presented that are currently used on board ships. Subsequently, advantages of a predictive maintenance system that will reduce risk by constantly monitoring the potential critical characteristics of VLSFO over other maintenance systems have been discussed. Then, assessments of compliance fuel have been done in accordancewith fuel properties, problems and corrective actions. Lastly, discussions and suggestions have been provided to the ship owners and technical managements.

🔖

Cite This Article

CANCA, A. Y., KÖKKÜLÜNK, G. (2020). Is Existing Maintenance System Adequate for Sulphur 2020 Amendments?. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 302–308. https://ajindex.com/articles/213240

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Solakivi, T., Laari, S., Kiiski, T., Töyli, J., Ojala, L. (2019). How Shipowners Have Adapted to Sulphur Regulations – Evidence from Finnish Seaborne Trade. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 7 (2), 338–345
  2. Chu-Van, T., Ramirez, J., Rainey, T., Ristovski, Z., Brown, R.J.(2019). Global Impacts Of Recent IMO Regulations on Marine Fuel Oil Refining Processes and Ship Emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 70, 123–134
  3. Zhu, M., Li, K. X., Lin, K.C., Shi, W., Yang, J. (2020). How Can Shipowners Comply with the 2020 Global Sulphur Limit Economically?. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 79, 102234
  4. Williams, P. J. l. B. (2010). The Natural Oceanic Carbon and Sulfur Cycles: Implications for SO2 And CO2 Emissions from Marine Shipping. International Journal of the Society for Underwater Technology, 29 (1), 5–19
  5. IMO. (2016a). Methanol as Marine Fuel: Environmental Benefits, Technology Readiness, and Economic Feasibility. IMO, London. http:// www.methanol.org/wp-content/ uploads/2016/07/IMO-MethanolMarine-Fuel-21.01.2016.pdf [6] IMO. (2016b). Studies on the Feasibility and Use of LNG as a Fuel for Shipping. IMO, London
  6. DNV-GL. (2019). Alternative Fuels Insight, Status on the Uptake of Scrubbers, Updated February 1, 2019. https://www.dnvgl.com/services/ alternative-fuels-insight-128171 [8] Vermeire, M. B., (2012). Everything YouNeed toKnow About Marine Fuels. Chevron Global Marine Products. https://silo.tips/download/ everything-you-need-to-know-aboutmarine-fuels-4 [9] Elvers, B. (2008). Handbook of Fuels: Energy Sources for Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1002/ elsc.200890010 [10] Agarwal, P., Sharma, D. K. (2010). Comparative Studies on the BioDesulfurization of Crude Oil with Other Desulfurization Techniques and Deep Desulfurization Through Integrated Processes. Energy Fuels, 24 (1), 518–524
  7. Michala, A. L., Lazakis, I., Theotokatos, G., Varelas, T. (2015). Predictive Maintenance Decision Support System for Enhanced Energy Efficiency of Ship Machinery. International Conference of Shipping in Changing Climates, Glasgow, UK
  8. Ang, J. H., Goh, C., Flores Saldivar, A. A., Li,Y.(2017).Energy-EfficientThroughLife Smart Design, Manufacturing and Operation of Ships in an Industry 4.0. Environment Energies, 10, 610. doi:10.3390/en10050610 [13] Simion, D., Purcărea, A., Cotorcea, A., Nicolae, F. (2020). Maintenance Onboard Ships using Computer Maintenance Management System. Scientific