SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 5

Estimating of shipping emissions in the Samsun Port from 2010 to 2015

Fatih ALVERA
Betül Ayhan SARAÇ
ÜLKÜ ALVER ŞAHİN
Pages
822–828
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In Ro-Ro ships, 80% of the total emissions are generated while the main engine is operational.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Turkey has an important role in maritime transport because it is surrounded on three sides by the sea and is strategically located between Asia and Europe.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Between 2010 and 2015, emissions of nitrogen oxides (NO2), sulphur dioxide (SO2), hydrocarbons (HC) and particulate matter less than 10 μm size (PM10) from six different ship types were calculated for different operating modes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In Ro-Ro ships, 80% of the total emissions are generated while the main engine is operational.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Turkey has an important role in maritime transport because it is surrounded on three sides by the sea and is strategically located between Asia and Europe. Therefore, air pollution due to ships is an important issue for Turkey. This study was carried out in Samsun, which is an important port on the Black Sea coast. Between 2010 and 2015, emissions of nitrogen oxides (NO2), sulphur dioxide (SO2), hydrocarbons (HC) and particulate matter less than 10 μm size (PM10) from six different ship types were calculated for different operating modes. The estimated values for NOx, SO2, HC and PM10 were 728 tons, 574 tons, 32 tons and 64 tons, respectively. The highest emission values were generated by general cargo ships. The highest percentage of total pollutants (71.6% for NOx, 65.9% for SO2, 54.9% for HC and 62.9% for PM10) were generated in cruising mode by Ro-Ro (Roll-on/ Roll-off) ships. Additionally, the maneuvering emissions were from 12.6% to 42.4% and the hoteling emissions were from 6.0% to 51.1% in total for all pollutants. In Ro-Ro ships, 80% of the total emissions are generated while the main engine is operational.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALVERA, F., SARAÇ, B. A., ŞAHİN, Ü. A. (2018). Estimating of shipping emissions in the Samsun Port from 2010 to 2015. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 5, 822–828. https://ajindex.com/articles/213168

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bilgili, L., Çelebi, U.B., 2016. Emission routing in maritime transportation. In: Energy, Transportation and Global Warming. Part of the Series Green Energy on Technology, pp. 837–849.
  2. Buccolieri, R., Cesari, R., Dioni, A., Maurizi, A., Tampieri, F., Sabatino, S.D., 2016. Impact of Ship emissions on local air quality in a Mediterranean city's harbour after the European sulphur directive. Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 59 (1), 30–41.
  3. Cesari, D., Genga, A., Ielpo, P., Siciliano, M., Mascolo, G., Grasso, F.M., Contini, D., 2014. Source apportionment of PM2.5 in the harbour–industrial area of Brindisi (Italy): identification and estimation of the contribution of in-port ship emissions. Sci. Total Environ. 497/498, 392–400.
  4. Chen, D., Zhao, Y., Nelson, P., Li, Y., Wang, X., Zhou, Y., Lang, J., Guo, X., 2016. Estimating ship emissions based on AIS data for port of Tianjin China. Atmos. Environ. 45, 10–18.
  5. Corbett, J., Fischbeck, P., Pandis, S., 1999. Global nitrogen and sulfur Inventories for ocean going ships. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 3457–3470.
  6. Corbett, J.J., Winebrake, J.J., Green, E.H., Kasibhatla, P., Eyring, V., Lauer, A., 2007. Mortality from ship emissions: a global assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41 (24), 8512–8518.
  7. Cullinane, K., Bergqvist, R., 2014. Emission control areas and their impact on maritime transport. Transport. Res. Part D 28, 1–5.
  8. Cullinane, K., Cullinane, S., 2013. Atmospheric emissions from shipping: the need for regulation and approaches to compliance. Transport Rev. 33 (4), 377–401.
  9. Cullinane, K., Tseng, P.H., Wilmsmeier, G., 2016. Estimation of container ship emissions at berth in Taiwan. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 10, 466–474.
  10. Deniz, C., Durmusoğlu, Y., 2008. Estimating shipping emissions in the region of the sea of Marmara. Sci. Total Environ. 390, 255–261.
  11. Deniz, C., Kılıç, A., 2009. Estimation and assessment of shipping emissions in the region of ambarlı port. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 29 (1), 107–115.
  12. Deniz, C., Kılıç, A., Civkaroglu, G., 2010. Estimation of shipping emissions in candarlı gulf, Turkey. Environ. Monit. Assess. 171 (1–4), 219–228.
  13. Donateo, A., Gregoris, E., Gambaro, A., Merico, E., Giua, R., Nocioni, A., Contini, D., 2014. Contribution of harbour activities and ship traffic to PM2.5 particle number concentrations and PAHs in a port city of the Mediterranean Sea (Italy). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 21, 9415–9429.
  14. Dragovic, B., Tzannatos, E., Tselentis, V., Mestrovic, R., Skuric, M., 2015. Ship emissions and their externa