Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2015 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 3

Fracture-dislocations of the proximal ulna

Pages
233–240
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Proximal-ulna fractures should be fixed with rigid internal fixation (plate and screw) even if the fracture is a simple 2-part fracture.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To investigate the relationship between injury patterns, complications, and the functional outcomes of patients with proximal-ulna fracture-dislocations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Retrospective analysis of 15 patients (10 men, 5 women; mean age, 49.1 years; mean follow-up 49 months) with 6 anterior and 9 posterior fracture-dislocations of the proximal ulna.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Proximal-ulna fractures should be fixed with rigid internal fixation (plate and screw) even if the fracture is a simple 2-part fracture.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the relationship between injury patterns, complications, and the functional outcomes of patients with proximal-ulna fracture-dislocations. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 15 patients (10 men, 5 women; mean age, 49.1 years; mean follow-up 49 months) with 6 anterior and 9 posterior fracture-dislocations of the proximal ulna. The proximal ulna was reconstructed with plates and screws in 13 patients and tension-band wiring in 2 patients. At the final follow-up, elbow range of motion (ROM) was measured and Mayo elbow scores (MEPS) were recorded. Broberg-Morrey criteria were used for osteoarthritis staging. Results: Concomitant radial-head fracture was seen in all posterior fracture-dislocations. Four ligamentous injuries occurred in this group. All anterior dislocations had trochlear-notch fractures without associated injuries. Mean flexion ROM was 130.6° (100°–140°) and mean loss of extension ROM was 12.6° (0°–30°) in the study group. The mean MEPS score was 92.3 (70–100). Patients with posterior fracture-dislocations showed lower ROM and MEPS and higher level of osteoarthritis than patients with anterior fracture-dislocations. Recurrent dislocations occurred in 2 patients who had ulna fractures fixed with tension-band wiring. Conclusion: Radial-head fracture and ligamentous injury are specific components of posterior fracture-dislocations. The injury is limited to the trochlear notch in anterior fracture-dislocations. Posterior fracture-dislocations have lower functional outcomes. Proximal-ulna fractures should be fixed with rigid internal fixation (plate and screw) even if the fracture is a simple 2-part fracture.

🔖

Cite This Article

GERELİ, A., NALBANTOĞLU, U., DİKMEN, G., SEYHAN, M., TÜRKMEN, M. (2015). Fracture-dislocations of the proximal ulna. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 3, 233–240. https://ajindex.com/articles/213152

References (19)

  1. Doornberg J, Ring D, Jupiter JB. Effective treatment of fracture-dislocations of the olecranon requires a stable trochlear notch. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004
  2. 292– 300. 2 Mortazavi SM, Asadollahi S, Tahririan MA. Functional outcome following treatment of transolecranon fracturedislocation of the elbow. Injury 2006
  3. 284–8. 3. O’Driscoll SW, Jupiter JB, Cohen MS, Ring D, McKee MD. Difficult elbow fractures: pearls and pitfalls. Instr Course Lect 2003
  4. 113–34. 4. Ring D, Jupiter JB. Fracture-dislocation of the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998
  5. 566–80. 5. Ring D, Jupiter JB, Sanders RW, Mast J, Simpson NS. Transolecranon fracture-dislocation of the elbow. J Orthop Trauma 1997
  6. 545–50. 6. Sahajpal D, Wright TW. Proximal ulna fractures. J Hand Surg Am 2009
  7. 357–62. 7. Tashjian RZ, Katarincic JA. Complex elbow instability. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2006
  8. 278–86. 8. Jupiter JB, Leibovic SJ, Ribbans W, Wilk RM. The posterior Monteggia lesion. J Orthop Trauma 1991
  9. 395–402. 9. Konrad GG, Kundel K, Kreuz PC, Oberst M, Sudkamp NP. Monteggia fractures in adults: long-term results and prognostic factors. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007
  10. 354–60. 10. Manidakis N, Sperelakis I, Hackney R, Kontakis G. Fractures of the ulnar coronoid process. Injury 2012
  11. 989–98. 11. Ring D, Jupiter JB, Simpson NS. Monteggia fractures in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998
  12. 1733–44. 12. Ring D, Jupiter JB. Reconstruction of posttraumatic elbow instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000
  13. 44–56. 13. Strauss EJ, Tejwani NC, Preston CF, Egol KA. The posterior Monteggia lesion with associated ulnohumeral instability. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006
  14. 84–9. 14. Doornberg JN, Guitton TG, Ring D
  15. Science of Variation Group. Diagnosis of elbow fracture patterns on radiographs: interobserver reliability and diagnostic accuracy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013
  16. 1373–8. 15. Giannicola G, Greco A, Sacchetti FM, Cinotti G, Nofroni I, Postacchini F. Complex fracture-dislocations of the proximal ulna and radius in adults: a comprehensive classification. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011
  17. 1289–99. 16. Mellema JJ, Doornberg JN1, Dyer GS1, Ring D. Distribution of coronoid fracture lines by specific patterns of traumatic elbow instability. J Hand Surg Am 2014
  18. 2041–6. 17. McKee MD, Schemitsch EH, Sala MJ, O’driscoll SW. The pathoanatomy of lateral ligamentous disruption in complex elbow instability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2003
  19. 391–6. 18. Buijze GA, Blankevoort L, Tuijthof GJ, Sierevelt IN, Kloen P. Biomecha