Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2015 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3

Diffusion-weighted imaging in the head and neck region: usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient values for characterization of lesions

Pages
208–214
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSIONDiffusion-weighted imaging and the ADC values can be used to differentiate and characterize benign and malignant head and neck lesions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We aimed to evaluate the role of apparent diffusion coeffi-cient (ADC) values calculated from diffusion-weighted imag-ing for head and neck lesion characterization in daily routine, in comparison with histopathological results.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Dif-fusion-weighted echo-planar MRI was performed on a 1.5 T unit with b factor of 0 and 1000 s/mm2 and ADC maps were generated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSIONDiffusion-weighted imaging and the ADC values can be used to differentiate and characterize benign and malignant head and neck lesions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the role of apparent diffusion coeffi-cient (ADC) values calculated from diffusion-weighted imag-ing for head and neck lesion characterization in daily routine, in comparison with histopathological results. METHODSNinety consecutive patients who underwent magnetic res-onance imaging (MRI) at a university hospital for diagnosis of neck lesions were included in this prospective study. Dif-fusion-weighted echo-planar MRI was performed on a 1.5 T unit with b factor of 0 and 1000 s/mm2 and ADC maps were generated. ADC values were measured for benign and malig-nant whole lesions seen in daily practice. RESULTSThe median ADC value of the malignant tumors and benign lesions were 0.72×10-3 mm2/s, (range, 0.39-1.51×10-3 mm2/s) and 1.17×10-3 mm2/s, (range, 0.52-2.38×10-3 mm2/s), respec-tively, with a significant difference between them (P < 0.001). A cutoff ADC value of 0.98×10-3 mm2/s was used to distin-guish between benign and malignant lesions, yielding 85.3% sensitivity and 78.6% specificity. The median ADC value of lymphomas (0.44×10-3 mm2/s; range, 0.39-0.58×10-3 mm2/s) was significantly smaller (P < 0.001) than that of squamous cell carcinomas (median ADC value 0.72×10-3 mm2/s; range, 0.65-1.06×10-3 mm2/s). There was no significant difference between median ADC values of inflammatory (1.13×10-3mm2/s; range, 0.85-2.38×10-3 mm2/s) and noninflammato-ry benign lesions (1.26×10-3 mm2/s; range, 0.52-2.33×10-3mm2/s). CONCLUSIONDiffusion-weighted imaging and the ADC values can be used to differentiate and characterize benign and malignant head and neck lesions.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞERİFOĞLU, İ., ÖZ, İ. İ., DAMAR, M., TOKGÖZ, Ö., YAZGAN, Ö., ERDEM, Z. (2015). Diffusion-weighted imaging in the head and neck region: usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient values for characterization of lesions. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3, 208–214. https://ajindex.com/articles/213058

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Driessen JP, van Kempen PM, van der Hei- jden GJ, et al. Diffusion-weighted imag- ing in head and neck squamous cell car- cinomas: A systematic review. Head Neck 2015; 37:440-448. [CrossRef] Yoshino N, Yamada I, Ohbayashi N, et al. Sal- ivary glands and lesions: evaluation of appar- ent diffusion coefficients with split-echo dif- fusion-weighted MR imaging--initial results. Radiology 2001; 221:837-842. [CrossRef] Sakamoto J, Sasaki Y, Otonari-Yamamoto M, Sano T. Comparison of various meth- ods for quantification of apparent diffu- sion coefficient of head and neck lesions with HASTE diffusion-weighted MR imag- ing. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012; 114:266-276. [CrossRef] Kim YJ, Chang KH, Song IC, et al. Brain abscess and necrotic or cystic brain tumor: discrimination with signal intensity on diffu- sion-weighted MR imaging. AJR Am J Roent- genol 1998; 171:1487-1490. [CrossRef] Schaefer PW. Applications of DWI in clinical neurology. J Neurol Sci 2001; 186:S25-S35. [CrossRef] Moseley ME, Kucharczyk J, Mintorovitch J, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of acute stroke: correlation with T2-weight- ed and magnetic susceptibility-enhanced MR imaging in cats. AJNR Am J Neurora- diol 1990; 11:423-429. Trojanowska A. Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck--The role of diffu- sion and perfusion imaging in tumor re- currence and follow-up. Rep Prac Oncol Radiother 2011; 16:207-212. [CrossRef] Varoquaux A, Rager O, Lovblad KO, et al. Functional imaging of head and neck squa- mous cell carcinoma with diffusion-weight- ed MRI and FDG PET/CT: quantitative analysis of ADC and SUV. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013; 40:842-852. [CrossRef] Wang J, Takashima S, Takayama F, et al. Head and neck lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 2001; 220:621-630. [CrossRef] Maeda M, Kato H, Sakuma H, Maier SE, Takeda K. Usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient in line scan diffu- sion-weighted imaging for distinguish- ing between squamous cell carcinomas and malignant lymphomas of the head and neck. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26:1186-1192.
  2. Abdel Razek AK, Gaballa G, Elhawarey G, Megahed AS, Hafez M, Nada N. Character- ization of pediatric head and neck masses with diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2009; 19:201-208. [CrossRef] Maeda M, Maier SE. Usefulness of diffu- sion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient in the assessment of head and neck tumors. J Neuroradiol 2008; 35:71-78. [CrossR