Journals / Çocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

The relationship between discipline methods, demographic data and behavioral problems

Ailedeki disiplin yöntemleri, demografik özellikler ve çocuklardaki davranış sorunları arasındaki ilişki

Pages
67–82
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study’s results provide important knowledge for family training program to the parents of our country.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between discipline methods, and demographic characteristics and behavioral problems of the children.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Participants were 442 parents who had children between ages 4-12 years old.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study’s results provide important knowledge for family training program to the parents of our country.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between discipline methods, and demographic characteristics and behavioral problems of the children. Methods: Participants were 442 parents who had children between ages 4-12 years old. The parents were asked for their own practices with a questionnaire including 8 questions. Additionally, Conners parent rating scale (CPRS) was used. Demographic data were collected from the hospital files. Results: The highest CPRS score was related to “money” as a prize and “beating” as a punishment. “Special time” was more frequently used by mothers (p=0.027) but “material prizes” were more frequently used by fathers (p=0.014). Boys were more beaten than girls (p=0.017). When gestational ages of the mothers decreased, frequency of “special time with the child” decreased (p=0.004). There was a negative correlation between educational level of mothers and prizing with “money” (p=0.005). Additionally, there was a negative correlation between educational level of fathers and punishing with “beating” (p=0.014). “Special time” was increased by the education levels of mothers and fathers (respectively; p=0.002, p=0.0001). In addition, when education levels of mothers (p=0.002) and fathers (p=0.008) increased, CPRS scores also decreased. Discussion: The proper and effective discipline is principal to normal psychological development. This study’s results provide important knowledge for family training program to the parents of our country.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, disiplin yöntemleri, çocuklardaki davranış sorunları ve demografik değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemek amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Çalışmaya 4-12 yaş arasında çocuğu olan 442 ana baba katılmıştır. Çalışmaya katılan ana babalara kendi disiplin uygulamaları 8 soru içeren bir anket formu ile sorulmuştur. Ayrıca Conners Aile Derecelendirme Ölçeği (CADÖ) kullanılmıştır. Demografik bilgilere olguların dosya kayıtlarından ulaşılmıştır. Sonuçlar: CADÖ ortalamalarına göre en yüksek davranış sorunu “para ile ödüllendirme” ve “ceza amacı ile vurma” seçenekleri ile ilişkili bulunmuştur. Annelerin babalara oranla çocuklarına daha fazla “özel zaman” ayırdığı (p=0.027), babaların ise annelerden daha sık olarak “maddi ödüller” verdiği belirlenmiştir (p=0.014). Erkek çocuklar kızlardan daha sık “dayak” ile cezalandırılmaktadır (p=0.017). Annenin çocuğu doğurma yaşı küçüldükçe, “özel zaman ayırma” sıklığı azalmaktadır (p=0.004). “Para ile ödüllendirme”, annenin eğitim düzeyi ile (p=0.005), “dayak” ise babanın eğitim düzeyi ile (p=0.014) ters orantılı olarak artmaktadır. “Birlikte sevdiği bir etkinlik yapma” anne ve babanın eğitim düzeyi ile doğru orantı göstermektedir (sırayla p=0.002, p=0.0001). Anne (p=0.002) ve babanın (p=0.008) eğitim düzeyi azaldıkça CADÖ ortalamalarının arttığı belirlenmiştir. Tartışma: Doğru ve etkili bir disiplin normal bir psikolojik gelişim için esastır. Bu çalışmanın sonuçları ülkemizde ana babalar için hazırlanacak eğitim programlarına önemli bilgiler sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAHİROĞLU, Y. A., BAHALI, M. K., AVCI, A., ŞEYDAOĞLU, G., UZEL, M. (2009). The relationship between discipline methods, demographic data and behavioral problems. Çocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 67–82. https://ajindex.com/articles/213021

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics (1998) Committee Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health. Guidance for effective discipline. Pediatrics 1001:723-728.
  2. American Academy of Pediatrics (2001) Committee on Public Education. Media violence. Pediatrics 108:1222–1226.
  3. Arnold DS, O’Leary SG, Wolff LS ve ark. (1993) The Parenting Scale: A measure of dysfunctional parenting in discipline situations. Psychol Assess 5:137-144.
  4. Barret P, Alison S, Lara H (2002) do parents and children behaviors differentiate families whose children have obsessive-compulsive disorder from other clinic and non-clinic families? J Child Psychol Psychiatry 43:597-607.
  5. Bilir S, Ari M, Donmez NB (1986) Physical abuse in 16,000 children with 2-4 years of age. J Child Dev Edu 1:7–14.
  6. Brenner V, Fox RA (1998) Parental discipline and behavior problems in young children. J Genet Psychol 158:251-256.
  7. Buri JR (1991) Parental Authority Questionnaire. J Pers Assess 57:110-119.
  8. Campbell JMC (1992) Parenting classes: focus on discipline. J Comm Health Nurs 9:197-208.
  9. Chan PA, Rabinowitz TA (2006) Cross-sectional analysis of video games and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms in adolescents. Ann Gen Psychiatry 24:5-16.
  10. Cheng TL, Brenner RA, Wright JL ve ark. (2004) Children’s Violent Television Viewing: Are Parents Monitoring? Pediatrics 114:94-99.
  11. Chumbley J, Griffiths M (2006) Affect and the computer game player: the effect of gender, personality, and game reinforcement structure on affective responses to computer game-play. Cyberpsychol Behav 9:308-316.
  12. Conners CK (1973) Rating scales for use in drug studies with children. Psychopharmacol Bull (special issuepharmacotherapy with children): 24-84
  13. Crockenberg S (1987) predictors and correlates of anger toward and punitive control of toddlers by adolescent mothers. Child Dev 58:964-975.
  14. Darling N, Steinberg L (1993) Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychol Bull 113:487-496.
  15. Day RD, Peterson GW, McCracken C (1998) Predicting spanking of younger and older children by mothers and fathers. Marriage Fam 60:7-94.
  16. Dereboy Ç, Şenol S, Şener Ş (1998) Conners anababa derecelendirme ölçeği uyarlama çalışması. X. Ulusal Psikoloji Kongresi, Ankara.
  17. Dereboy Ç, Şenol S, Şahnur Ş ve ark. (2007) Conners kısa form öğretmen ve ana baba derecelendirme ölçeklerinin geçerliliği. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi 18:48-58.
  18. Feldhaus KM, Koziol-McLain J, Amsbury HL ve ark. (1997) Accuracy of three brief screening questions for detecting partner violence