✨
AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI Insight⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)
The review focuses on the efficiency of ion removal.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A review of the studies dealing with the removal of chromium, cadmium, and nickel ions with different adsorbents published in the literature between 2014 and 2018 is given in tabular form, along with the adsorption conditions, adsorption isotherm, and kinetic models applied by the authors to model the experimental data and adsorption capacities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A review of the studies dealing with the removal of chromium, cadmium, and nickel ions with different adsorbents published in the literature between 2014 and 2018 is given in tabular form, along with the adsorption conditions, adsorption isotherm, and kinetic models applied by the authors to model the experimental data and adsorption capacities.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The review focuses on the efficiency of ion removal.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Adsorption · chromium · cadmium
Abstract
A review of the studies dealing with the removal of chromium, cadmium, and nickel ions with different adsorbents published in the literature between 2014 and 2018 is given in tabular form, along with the adsorption conditions, adsorption isotherm, and kinetic models applied by the authors to model the experimental data and adsorption capacities. The review focuses on the efficiency of ion removal.
🔖
Cite This Article
PFEİFER, A., SKERGET, M. (2020). A review: a comparison of different adsorbents for removal of Cr (VI), Cd (II) and Ni (II). Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 4, 859–883. https://ajindex.com/articles/212687