Journals / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 5

Application of synthesized copper nanoparticles using aqueous extract of Ziziphus mauritiana L. leaves as a colorimetric sensor for the detection of Ag+

Pages
1376–1385
Publication Date
2020-10-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For real water samples, limit of quantification (LOQ) and limit of detection (LOD) for Ag+ was found to be 330 x 10(-9) and 100 x 10(-9) , respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The presented work demonstrates the preparation of copper nanoparticles (CuNPs) via aqueous leaves extract of Ziziphus mauritiana L (Zm) using hydrazine as a reducing agent.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Various parameters such as volume of extract, concentration of hydrazine hydrate, concentration of copper chloride, and pl 1 of the solution were optimized to obtain Ziziphus mauritiana 1. leaves extract derived copper nanoparticles (Zm-CuNPs).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For real water samples, limit of quantification (LOQ) and limit of detection (LOD) for Ag+ was found to be 330 x 10(-9) and 100 x 10(-9) , respectively.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Copper nanoparticles · Ziziphus mauritiana L. · plant leaves extract

Abstract

The presented work demonstrates the preparation of copper nanoparticles (CuNPs) via aqueous leaves extract of Ziziphus mauritiana L (Zm) using hydrazine as a reducing agent. Various parameters such as volume of extract, concentration of hydrazine hydrate, concentration of copper chloride, and pl 1 of the solution were optimized to obtain Ziziphus mauritiana 1. leaves extract derived copper nanoparticles (Zm-CuNPs). Brownish red color was initial indication of the formation of Zm-CuNPs while it was confirmed by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) band at wavelength of 584 nm using ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy. Synthesized Zm-CuNPs were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AIM, and X-ray diffractometry (XRD). AFM images showed that the particle size of Zm-CuNPs was from 7 to 17 nm with an average size of 11.3 nm. Fabricated sensor (Zm-CuNPs) were used as a colorimetric sensor for the detection of Ag+ at a linear range between 0.67 x 10(-6)- 9.3 x 10(-6) with R-2 value of 0.992. For real water samples, limit of quantification (LOQ) and limit of detection (LOD) for Ag+ was found to be 330 x 10(-9) and 100 x 10(-9) , respectively.

🔖

Cite This Article

MEMON, R., MEMON, A. A., SHERAZİ, S. T. H., SİRAJUDDİN, S., BALOUCH, A., SHAH, M. R., MAHESAR, S. A., RAJAR, K., AGHEEM, M. H. (2020). Application of synthesized copper nanoparticles using aqueous extract of Ziziphus mauritiana L. leaves as a colorimetric sensor for the detection of Ag+. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 5, 1376–1385. https://ajindex.com/articles/212681

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Abdallah EM, 2016, BIOSCI BIOTECHNO RES, V9, P605, DOI 10.21786/bbrc/9.4/6 Balasubramanian S, 2019, INT J NANOSCI, V18, DOI 10.1142/S0219581X18500114 Batoool M., 2017, J NANOSCI NANOTECHNO, V1, P1 CATSAKIS LH, 1978, ORAL SURG ORAL MED O, V46, P371, DOI 10.1016/0030-4220(78)90402-4 Chang YQ, 2016, SENSOR ACTUAT B-CHEM, V232, P692, DOI 10.1016/j.snb.2016.04.039 Chen ZN, 2019, MICROCHIM ACTA, V186, DOI 10.1007/s00604-018-3139-1 Chung IM, 2017, EXP THER MED, V14, P18, DOI [10.3892/etm.2017.1/166, 10.3892/etm.2017.4466] Din MI, 2017, ANAL LETT, V50, P50, DOI 10.1080/00032719.2016.1172081 Dobrucka Renata, 2018, Advances in Natural Sciences: Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, V9, DOI 10.1088/2043-6254/aac5a0 Drake PL, 2005, ANN OCCUP HYG, V49, P575, DOI 10.1093/annhyg/mei019 Du JJ, 2018, SENSOR ACTUAT B-CHEM, V255, P808, DOI 10.1016/j.snb.2017.08.034 Gopinath M., 2014, International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, V3, P814 Goudarzi M, 2019, J ALLOY COMPD, V784, P676, DOI 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.01.028 He Y, 2016,
  2. PLASMONICS, V11, P587, DOI 10.1007/s11468-015-0092-2 Hussain M, 2016, RSC ADV, V6, P82882, DOI 10.1039/c6ra08571g Jacobson AR, 2005, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V345, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.10.027 Joseph A. T., 2016, INT J SCI ENG TECHNO, V4, P463 Karimi J, 2015, SYNTH REACT INORG M, V45, P895, DOI 10.1080/15533174.2013.862644 Kaur P., 2016, GREEN CHEM LETT REV, V9, P33, DOI DOI 10.1080/17518253.2016.1141238 Li XY, 2017, BIOSENS BIOELECTRON, V92, P496, DOI 10.1016/j.bios.2016.10.075 Lin YH, 2009, CHEM COMMUN, P6619, DOI 10.1039/b915990h Lou TT, 2011, ACS APPL MATER INTER, V3, P4215, DOI 10.1021/am2008486 Memon AA, 2013, FOOD CHEM, V139, P496, DOI 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.01.065 Memon AA, 2012, PAK J ANAL ENV CHEM, V13, P123 Memon AA, 2012, POL J FOOD NUTR SCI, V62, P15, DOI 10.2478/v10222-011-0035-3 Mijnendonckx K, 2013,
  3. BIOMETALS, V26, P609, DOI 10.1007/s10534-013-9645-z Nadagouda MN, 2008, GREEN CHEM, V10, P859, DOI 10.1039/b804703k Padma PN, 2018, ANN RES REV BIOL, V23, P1, DOI DOI 10.9734/ARRB/2018/38894 Panyala NR, 2008, J APPL BIOMED, V6, P117, DOI 10.32725/jab.2008.015 Park J, 2014, BIOSENS BIOELECTRON, V60, P299, DOI 10.1016/j.bios.2014.04.038 Parveen K, 2016, AIP CONF PROC, V1724, DOI 10.1063/1.4945168 Patel BH, 2016, J ENVIRON CHEM ENG, V4, P2163, DOI 10.1016/j.jece.2016.03.046 Philip D, 2010, PHYSICA E, V42, P1417, DOI 10.1016/j.physe.2009.11.081 Rajar K, 2018, J ELECTRON MATER, V47, P2177, DOI 10.1007/s11664-017-6029-0 Raj