Journals / Journal of Eta Maritime Science / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

How Ports Can Improve Their Sustainability Performance: Triple Bottom Line Approach

Pages
41–50
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study concludes that “materiality model” and “Fatal 5 program” developed by APM Terminals have remarkable positive effects on sustainability performances of ports.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Ports, located at the center of the world trade, are shown to be one of the harmful industries to the environment due to their characteristics such as the amount of waste they produce, harmful emissions, and noise pollution they cause.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Hence, to detect the degree of importance of port sustainability criteria and decide the sustainability performance of the chosen port is determined as the primary aim of this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study concludes that “materiality model” and “Fatal 5 program” developed by APM Terminals have remarkable positive effects on sustainability performances of ports.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Ports, located at the center of the world trade, are shown to be one of the harmful industries to the environment due to their characteristics such as the amount of waste they produce, harmful emissions, and noise pollution they cause. That makes ports also one of the important industries to reduce this harm caused by itself. In order to work toward reducing this harm, it is thought that the factors that cause the most damage should be determined first, then the steps for reducing the damage caused by these factors should be found. Hence, to detect the degree of importance of port sustainability criteria and decide the sustainability performance of the chosen port is determined as the primary aim of this study. In order to achieve this objective, the sustainability performance of an international port has been examined for seven years, based on financial, environmental, and social dimensions of sustainability with the analytical hierarchy process and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution methods. Accordingly, the possible reasons of port sustainability performance inequalities for all three dimensions of sustainability have been discussed. This study concludes that “materiality model” and “Fatal 5 program” developed by APM Terminals have remarkable positive effects on sustainability performances of ports.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZİSPA, N. (2021). How Ports Can Improve Their Sustainability Performance: Triple Bottom Line Approach. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 41–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/212668

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. T. Kuhlman, and J. Farrington, “What is sustainability?” Sustainability, vol. 2, pp. 3436-3448, 2010
  2. M. Taşçıoğlu, “Consumers’ perceptions towards sustainability: A cross-cultural analysis.” Electronic Theses and Dissertation, Statesboro, Georgia: Georgia Southern University; 2014
  3. J. E. Moore, A. Mascarenhas, J. Bain, and S. E. Straus, “Developing a comprehensive definition of sustainability,” Implementation Science, vol. 12, pp. 110, September 2017
  4. H. D. Kuş, “Sustainable supply chain management application to Turkish construction industry.” [Unpublished master’s thesis]. İstanbul: Fatih University Institute of Sciences and Engineering; 2012
  5. G. H. Brundtland, “Report of the world commission on environment and development: our common future,” United Nations: 1987
  6. J. F. Henri, and M. Journeault, “Eco-control: The influence of management control systems on environmental and economic performance”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 35, pp. 63-80, January 2010
  7. J. Elkington, “Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom line of 21st century,” Journal of Business Ethics, Capstone Publishing Limited, Oxford, 1997, pp. 402
  8. B. Moldan, S. Janoušková, and T. Hák, “How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: Indicators and targets,” Ecological Indicators, vol. 17, pp. 4-13, June 2012
  9. A. Eş, “Sürdürülebilirlik ve firma düzeyinde sürdürülebilirlik performans ölçümü. [unpublished master’s thesis]. Bolu: Abant İzzet Baysal University Institute of Social Sciences, 2008
  10. P. Bansal, “Evolving sustainability: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 26, pp. 197-218, December 2005
  11. E. Nemli, Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma: Şirketlerin Çevresel ve Sosyal Yaklaşımları, Filiz Kitabevi, İstanbul, 2004, pp. 206
  12. J. M. Harris, “Basic principles of sustainable development,” Global Development and Environment Institute, Working Paper: 00-04, USA: Tufts University, June 2000
  13. T. Daamen, “Sustainable development of the European port-city interface,” in ENHR-conference Rotterdam, June 25-28, 2007, pp. 1-20
  14. K. A. Abood, “Sustainable and green ports: Application of sustainability principles to port development and operation,” In Ports 2007: 30 Years of Sharing Ideas: 1977-2007, March 25-28, 2007
  15. J. S. L. Lam, and E. Van de Voorde, “Green port strategy for sustainable growth and development,” In Transport Logistics for Sustainable Growth at a New Lev