SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Eta Maritime Science / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Model Proposal for Future Estimates in Maritime Industry: The Case of Container Handling in Turkish Ports

ÜNAL ÖZDEMİR
Pages
13–21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, the demand forecasts for the container volume that would be handled in Turkish ports were conducted for the year 2022 with the developed model, and a methodological approach was presented for the forecast models in different maritime industry fields.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Future planning is difficult in several industries, including the maritime sector, especially with the current pandemic because of numerous active dynamic factors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The monthly container volume handled in Turkish ports between January 2005 and December 2018 was used, and augmented Dickey-Fuller tests were conducted with the EViews 5 software.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, the demand forecasts for the container volume that would be handled in Turkish ports were conducted for the year 2022 with the developed model, and a methodological approach was presented for the forecast models in different maritime industry fields.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Future planning is difficult in several industries, including the maritime sector, especially with the current pandemic because of numerous active dynamic factors. Thus, this study aimed to determine the freight demand estimates based on the Twenty-foot Equivalent Unit-based monthly number of containers handled in Turkish ports by comparing the prediction accuracy and reliability of artificial neural network (ANN) models with various algorithms using the “exponential smoothing” and “Box-Jenkins” time series methods. The monthly container volume handled in Turkish ports between January 2005 and December 2018 was used, and augmented Dickey-Fuller tests were conducted with the EViews 5 software. Results from several tests revealed that the 12-time delay ANN model, which was developed with the original series, provided the highest accuracy. In this study, the demand forecasts for the container volume that would be handled in Turkish ports were conducted for the year 2022 with the developed model, and a methodological approach was presented for the forecast models in different maritime industry fields.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEMİR, Ü. (2021). Model Proposal for Future Estimates in Maritime Industry: The Case of Container Handling in Turkish Ports. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 13–21. https://ajindex.com/articles/212665

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. UNCTAD, Review of Maritime Transport 2019. United Nations Publications, eISBN 978-92-1-004302-1, New York, United States of America. 2019
  2. Ç. Polat, and F. Merdivenci, “Evaluation of line selection criteria of freight forwarders in container transportation,” Turkish Journal of Maritime and Marine Sciences, vol. 5, pp. 112-126, 2019
  3. J. Garriddo, S. Sauri, Á. Marrero, Ü. Gül, and C. Rua, “Predicting the future capacity and dimensions of container ships,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 2674, pp. 177-190, June 2020
  4. I. Wagner, “Transportation & Logistics”, Global Container Market, 2018. Available: www.statista.com [5] N.K. Park, and S.C. Suh, “Tendency toward mega containerships and the constraints of container terminals,” Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, vol. 7, pp. 1-13, Feb 2019
  5. WTO, (2019), “World Trade Report” 2019. Available: https:// www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/00_wtr19_e.pdf [7] Ç. Iris, J. Christensen, D. Pacino, and S. Ropke, “Flexible ship loading problem with transfer vehicle assignment and scheduling,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 111, pp. 113-134, Feb 2018
  6. V. Kannan, S. K. Bose, and N.G. Kannan, “An evaluation of ocean container carrier selection criteria: An Indian shipper’s perspective,” Management Research Review, vol. 34, pp. 754-772, Jun 2011
  7. P. Kolar, H. J. Schramm, and G. Prockl, “Intermodal transport and repositioning of empty containers in central and eastern europe hinterland,” Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 69, pp. 73-82, May 2018
  8. H. Bendall, and A. F. Stent, “Investment strategies in market uncertainty,” Maritime Policy & Management, vol. 30, pp. 293- 303, May 2010
  9. H. M. A. Meersman, “Port investments in an uncertain environment,” Research in Transportation Economics, vol. 13, pp. 279-298, 2005
  10. C. Solak Fışkın, E. F. Akgül, and Ç. Karataş Çetin, “Liman rekabetçiliğini etkileyen faktörler: Ege bölgesi konteyner terminalleri kullanıcılarına yönelik bir VZAHP uygulaması,” Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 8, pp. 1-23, Jan 2016
  11. Z. Peng, H. Wang, W. Wang, and Y. Jiang, “Intermodal transportation of full and empty containers in harbor-inland regions based on revenue management,” European Transport Research Review, vol. 11, pp. 7, Jan 2019
  12. A. Çalışkan, and Y. Öztürkoğlu, “Evaluation of financial performance of container lines with respect to operational qual