Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

Quantitative evaluation of source interventions for urban air quality improvement - A case study of Delhi city

Pages
577–583
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that efficient cleaning of road dust, restricted use of coal based tandoors in hotels/restaurants and together can reduce the PM2.5 concentrations at selected locations up to 25%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Air pollution in Delhi city is an alarming level from last few years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The present study has made an attempt towards the quantitative evaluation of selected management strategies in the reduction of air pollution in Delhi city.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate that efficient cleaning of road dust, restricted use of coal based tandoors in hotels/restaurants and together can reduce the PM2.5 concentrations at selected locations up to 25%.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Air pollution in Delhi city is an alarming level from last few years. The major challenge for the policy makers is to reduce/manage the elevated air pollution level and related acute and chronic health impacts. Air pollution continues to be a nightmare for Delhiites despite implementation of several diversified source interventions. However, the efficacy of these interventions in the reduction of air pollution level did not evaluate before their implementation in the city. The present study has made an attempt towards the quantitative evaluation of selected management strategies in the reduction of air pollution in Delhi city. The results indicate that efficient cleaning of road dust, restricted use of coal based tandoors in hotels/restaurants and together can reduce the PM2.5 concentrations at selected locations up to 25%. The NOx concentration can reduce by restricting the use of diesel generator sets and coal based tandoors in the hotels up to 6%. Results also indicated that individual sources are not sufficient in controlling the increasing air pollution in the city. A stringent policy portfolio involving the combination of various mitigation measures is necessary to attain the NAAQS along with the policies to control the transboundary movement of air pollutants.

🔖

Cite This Article

GULİA, S., MİTTAL, A., KHARE, M. (2018). Quantitative evaluation of source interventions for urban air quality improvement - A case study of Delhi city. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 577–583. https://ajindex.com/articles/212562

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. CPCB (Central Pollution Control Board), 2011. Guidelines for the Measurement of Ambient Air Pollutants VOLUME-ii. Central Pollution Control Board, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change 62 page. Available at: http://cpcb.nic.in/
  2. NAAQSManualVolumeII.pdf. Dholakia, H.H., Purohit, P., Rao, S., Garg, A., 2013. Impact of current policies on future air quality and health outcomes in Delhi, India. Atmos. Environ. 75, 241–248.
  3. Elbir, T., 2003. Comparison of model predictions with the data of an urban air quality monitoring network in Izmir, Turkey. Atmos. Environ. 37, 2149–2157.
  4. Elbir, T., Mangir, N., Kara, M., Simsir, S., Eren, T., Ozdemir, S., 2010. Development of a GIS-based decision support system for urban air quality management in the city of Istanbul. Atmos. Environ. 44, 441–454. GoD (Goverment of Delhi), 2016. Chapter 12, Transport, Economic Survey of Delhi, 2014- 15. Available at: http://delhi.gov.in/wps/wcm/connect/DoIT_Planning/planning/ economic+survey+of+dehli/economic+survey+of+delhi+2014+-+2015, Accessed date: 27 February 2016.
  5. Goyal, P., 2003. Present scenario of air quality in Delhi: a case study of CNG implementation. Atmos. Environ. 37, 5423–5431.
  6. Gulia, S., Nagendra, S.S., Khare, M., Khanna, I., 2015a. Urban air quality management- A review. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 6, 286–304.
  7. Gulia, S., Shrivastava, A., Nema, A.K., Khare, M., 2015b. Assessment of urban air quality around a heritage site using AERMOD: a case study of Amritsar City, India. Environ. Model. Assess. 20, 599–608.
  8. Gurjar, B.R., Butler, T.M., Lawrence, M.G., Lelieveld, J., 2008. Evaluation of emissions and air quality in megacities. Atmos. Environ. 42, 1593–1606.
  9. Guttikunda, S.K., Calori, G., 2013. A GIS based emissions inventory at 1 km x 1 km spatial resolution for air pollution analysis in Delhi, India. Atmos. Environ. 67, 101–111.
  10. Heal, M.R., Kumar, P., Harrison, R.M., 2012. Particles, air quality, policy and health. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 6606–6630.
  11. Khare, M., Nagendra, S., Gulia, S., 2012. Performance evaluation of air quality dispersion models at urban intersection of an Indian city: a case study of Delhi city. In: Proceeding of 20th WIT International Conference on Air Pollution at Coruna, vol. 157. pp. 249–259.
  12. Krelling, C., Badami, M.G., 2016. Operational and financial performance of Delhi's natural gas-fueled public bus transit fleet: a critical evaluation. Transport Policy 47, 178–188.
  13. Kumar, P., Gulia, S., Harrison, R.M., Khare, M., 2017. The influence of odd–even car