Journals / Genel Tıp Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3

Levels of coping with stres, depression and prenatal attachment and affecting factors of pregnant women

Gebelerin stresle başa çıkma, depresyon ve prenatal bağlanma düzeyleri ve bunları etkileyen faktörler

Pages
99–108
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Pregnant women whose income less than expenses, who have lower levels of education and minded termination of pregnancy have more depressive symptoms and they use submissive and helpless approach with coping stress.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The purpose of this study is to determine levels and effecting factors of prenatal attachment, coping styles with stress and depressive symptoms of pregnant women.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The research was conducted with 342 pregnant women applying to The Perinatology Department of Istanbul Medical School of Istanbul University between January and October, 2009.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Pregnant women whose income less than expenses, who have lower levels of education and minded termination of pregnancy have more depressive symptoms and they use submissive and helpless approach with coping stress.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to determine levels and effecting factors of prenatal attachment, coping styles with stress and depressive symptoms of pregnant women. Methods: The research was conducted with 342 pregnant women applying to The Perinatology Department of Istanbul Medical School of Istanbul University between January and October, 2009. In accumulating data, Introduction Form of Pregnants, Prenatal Attachment Inventory (PAI), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) and Ways of Coping with Stress Scale were used. Data were collected through face to face interview by researcher. This is a cross-sectional and descriptive study. Results: 53,5 % of women&#8217;s CES-D score was 16 or higher. Average of PAI score was 60,7±10,1. The mean of pregnant women&#8217;s ways of coping with stress subscales were; submissive approach 1,0±0,5, helpless approach 1,1±0,5, self confident approach 2,0±0,5, optimistic approach 1,7±0,5, seeking for social support 1,9±0,6. Thirty five years old and above had lower PAI scores (p<0,05). PAI scores were lower (p<0,01) and CES-D scores were higher (p<0,001) in pregnant women graduated from elementary school and unemployed. Employed pregnant women were seeking for social support more than the others (p:0,000). Unemployed pregnant women were used more helpless (p<0,001) and submissive (p<0,001) coping style. Primiparous women (p<0,001) and women who have not got any child (p<0,001) had higher scores of PAI. Conclusion: Pregnant women who were became pregnant 35 years old and over, have lower levels of education, unemployed, having unplanned pregnancy and multiparous have lower prenatal attachment score. Pregnant women whose income less than expenses, who have lower levels of education and minded termination of pregnancy have more depressive symptoms and they use submissive and helpless approach with coping stress.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı gebelerin stresle başa çıkma tarzları, depresif semptomları, prenatal bağlanma düzeyleri ve bunları etkileyen faktörleri belirlemektir. Yöntem: Araştırma İ.Ü. İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi Perinatoloji polikliniğine başvuran 342 gebeyle yapıldı. Verilerin toplanmasında Gebe Tanıtım Formu, Epidemiyolojik Araştırmalar Merkezi Depresyon Skalası (EAMDS), Prenatal Bağlanma Envanteri (PBE) kullanıldı. Veriler araştırmacı tarafından karşılıklı görüşme yöntemi ile toplandı. Tanımlayıcı ve kesitsel tipte bir çalışmadır. Bulgular: Kadınların % 53,5’inin EAMDS puanı 16 ve üzerindeydi. PBE puan ortalamaları ise 60,7±10,1 idi. Gebelerin stresle başa çıkma tarzı alt boyut puanları; boyun eğici yaklaşım 1,0±0,5, çaresiz yaklaşım 1,1±0,5, kendine güvenli yaklaşım 2,0±0,5, iyimser yaklaşım 1,7±0,5, sosyal destek arama 1,9±0,6 idi. Otuz beş yaş ve üzerinde olanların PBE puanları daha düşüktü (p<0,05). İlköğrenim mezunu ve çalışmayan gebelerin EAMDS puanı yüksek (p<0,001) PBE puanı düşüktü (p<0,005). Çalışan gebeler daha fazla sosyal destek aramaktaydı (p<0,001). Çalışmayan gebeler çaresiz (p<0,001) ve boyun eğici (p<0,001) başa çıkma tarzını daha fazla kullanmaktaydı. Primiparların (p<0,001) ve çocuğu olmayanların (p<0,001) PBE puanı daha yüksekti. Sonuç: Otuzbeş yaş ve üzerinde gebe kalan, öğrenim düzeyi düşük olan, çalışmayan, gebeliği planlı olmayan ve multipar gebelerin bağlanma düzeyleri daha düşük seviyededir. Geliri giderinden az, öğrenim düzeyi düşük ve gebeliğini sonlandırmayı düşünen kadınlar daha fazla depresif belirti göstermekte ve stresle başa çıkma tarzı olarak boyun eğici ve çaresiz yaklaşımı kullanmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, S. D., BEJİ, N. K. (2010). Levels of coping with stres, depression and prenatal attachment and affecting factors of pregnant women. Genel Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3, 99–108. https://ajindex.com/articles/212484

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Da Costa D, Larouche J, Dritsa M, Brender W. Variations in stress levels over the course of pregnancy: factors associated with elevated hassles, state anxiety and pregnancy-specific stress. J Psychosom Res 1999;47:609-21
  2. Karaçam Z, Ançel G. Depression, anxiety and influencing factors in pregnancy: a study in a Turkish population. Midwifery 2009;25:344-56
  3. Blechman EA, Lowell ES, Garrett J. Prosocial coping and substance use during pregnancy. Addict Behav 1999;24:99- 109
  4. Baor L, Soskolne V. Mothers of IVF and spontaneously conceived twins: a comparison of prenatal maternal expectations, coping resources and maternal stress. Hum Reprod 2010;25:1490-6
  5. Huizink AC, de Medina PG, Mulder EJ, Visser GH, Buitelaar JK. Coping in normal pregnancy. Ann Behav Med 2002;24:132-40
  6. Gaffney KF. Maternal-fetal attachment in relation to selfconcept and anxiety. Matern Child Nurs J 1986;15: 91-101
  7. Condon JT, Corkindale C. The correlates of antenatal attachment in pregnant women. Br J Med Psychol 1997;70:359-72
  8. Lindgren K. Relationships among maternal-fetal attachment, prenatal depression, and health practices in pregnancy. Res Nurs Health 2001;24:203-17
  9. Bowlby J. Attachment and Loss Volume I: Attachment. 2nd ed. New York: Basic Books, Inc.; 1982
  10. Fonagy P. Introduction to attachment theory. In Attachment Theory and Psychoanalysis. New York: Other Press.; 2001. ss. 5-18
  11. Peppers LG, Knapp RJ. Maternal reactions to involuntary fetal/infant death. Psychiatry 1980;43:155-9
  12. Muller, ME. The development and testing of the Muller Prenatal Attachment Inventory. Dissertation. University of California, San Fransisco; 1990
  13. Shieh C, Kravitz M, Wang HH. What do we know about maternal-fetal attachment? Kaohsiung Med Sci 2001;17:448- 54
  14. Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale:A self-report depression scalefor research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement 1977;1:385-405
  15. Folkman S, Lazarus RS. An analysis of coping in a middle aged community sample. J Health Soc Behav 1980;21:219-39. 16
  16. Şahin HN, Durak A. Stresle başaçıkma tarzları ölçeği; üniversite öğrencileri için uyarlanması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 1995;10:56-73
  17. Setse R, Grogan R, Pham L, Cooper LA, Strobino D, Powe NR et al. Longitudinal study of depressive symptoms and health-related quality of life during pregnancy and after delivery: the Health Status in Pregnancy (HIP) study. Matern Child Health J 2009;13:577-87
  18. Lancaster CA, Flynn HA, Johnson TR,