Journals / Central Bank Review / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3

Logistics performance and export variety: Evidence from Turkey

Pages
143–154
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thesefindings are robust to a variety of alternative measures and estimation methods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the effects of logistics infrastructure on export variety, as measured by the extensivemargin.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Usingfinely disaggregated exports data for Turkey’s trade with 174 countries over the period2007e2017, we decompose gross exportflows into the extensive and intensive margins of Turkish ex-ports utilizing the method developed by Hummels and Klenow (2005).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thesefindings are robust to a variety of alternative measures and estimation methods.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This study examines the effects of logistics infrastructure on export variety, as measured by the extensivemargin. Usingfinely disaggregated exports data for Turkey’s trade with 174 countries over the period2007e2017, we decompose gross exportflows into the extensive and intensive margins of Turkish ex-ports utilizing the method developed by Hummels and Klenow (2005). Gravity estimates suggest thatlogistics infrastructure positively influences export values and has a greater impact on the extensivemargin than the intensive margin. Our empirical analysis further suggests that Turkish exporters aremore sensitive to changes in local market logistics conditions than to those of their trade partners. Thesefindings are robust to a variety of alternative measures and estimation methods.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÖNGÜR, Ü., TÜRKCAN, K., ÖZÇELİK, S. E. (2020). Logistics performance and export variety: Evidence from Turkey. Central Bank Review, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3, 143–154. https://ajindex.com/articles/212367

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aldan, A., Çulha, O.Y., 2016. The role of the extensive margin in export of Turkey: acomparative Analysis. Central Bank Review 16 (2), 59-64.
  2. Amurgo-Pacheco, A., Pierola, M.D., 2008. Patterns of Export Diversification inDeveloping Countries: Intensive and Extensive Margins. In: World Bank PolicyResearch Working Paper no.4473. Arvis, J.-F., Mustra, M.A., Ojala, L., Shepherd, B., Saslavsky, D., 2012. Connecting toCompete 2012: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy: the Logistics Perfor-mance Index and its Indicators. The World Bank, Washington, DC. Baier, S.L., Bergstrand, J.H., 2007. Do free trade agreements actually increasemembers’international trade? J. Int. Econ. 71 (1), 72-95.
  3. Bensassi, S., Marquez-Ramos, L., Martínez-Zarzoso, I., Suarez-Burguet, C., 2015.Relationship between logistics infrastructure and trade: evidence from Spanishregional exports. Transport. Res. Pol. Pract. 72, 47-61.
  4. Bernhofen, D.M., El-Sahli, Z., Kneller, R., 2016. Estimating the effects of the containerrevolution on world trade. J. Int. Econ. 98, 36-50.
  5. Berns, R., Kikkawa, A.K., 2019. Measuring trade in value added with Firm-Level Data.In: NBB Working Paper No 378, November 2019.
  6. Besedes, T., Prusa, T.J., 2011. The role of extensive and intensive margins and exportgrowth. J. Dev. Econ. 96 (2), 371-379.
  7. Beverelli, C., Neumueller, S., Teh, R., 2015. Export diversification effects of the WTOtrade facilitation agreement. World Dev. 76, 293-310.
  8. Bingzhan, S., 2011. Extensive margin, quantity and price in China’s export growth.China Econ. Rev. 22 (2), 233-243.
  9. Bourdet, Y., Persson, M., 2014. Expanding and diversifying south mediterraneanexports through trade facilitation. Dev. Pol. Rev. 32 (6), 675-699.
  10. Bricongne, J.C., Fontagne, L., Gaulier, G., Taglioni, D., Vicard, V., 2012. Firms and theglobal crisis: French exports in the turmoil. J. Int. Econ. 87 (1), 134-146. CEPII, 2019a. BACI: international trade database at the product-level. Retrievedfrom.http://www.cepii.fr. CEPII, 2019b. GeoDist database. Retrieved from.http://www.cepii.fr.
  11. Chaney, T., 2008. Distorted gravity: the intensive and extensive margins of inter-national trade. Am. Econ. Rev. 98 (4), 1707-1721.
  12. Clark, X., Dollar, D., Micco, A., 2004. Port efficiency, maritime transport costs, andbilateral trade. J. Dev. Econ. 75 (2), 417-450.
  13. Coşar, A.K., Demir, B., 2016. Domestic road infrastructure and international trade:evidence from Turkey. J. Dev. Econ. 118, 232-244.
  14. Çelebi, D., 2019. The role of logistics performance in pro