Journals / Central Bank Review / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3

Credit decomposition and economic activity in Turkey: A wavelet-based approach

Pages
109–131
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

By taking into account alternativecredit decomposition and the variations over time and across frequencies using the wavelet analysis, theresults show that: i) GDP growth highly synchronizes with credit growth compared to otherfinancialvariables such as stock exchange, bonds, and exchange rate. ii) There is a high correlation betweencommercial loan growth and capital formation and a relatively weak one with consumer loans andconsumption. iii) Co-movement stemming from Turkish Lira (TL) credits to GDP growth is stronger thanforeign exchange (FX) credits where the latter is significant until 2015. iv) Public and domestic privatebanks are the main drivers of economic activity while the foreign banks are following them.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper aims to investigate the co-movement between the credit growth and gross domestic product(GDP) growth in Turkey over the period January 2004eOctober 2019.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By taking into account alternativecredit decomposition and the variations over time and across frequencies using the wavelet analysis, theresults show that: i) GDP growth highly synchronizes with credit growth compared to otherfinancialvariables such as stock exchange, bonds, and exchange rate. ii) There is a high correlation betweencommercial loan growth and capital formation and a relatively weak one with consumer loans andconsumption. iii) Co-movement stemming from Turkish Lira (TL) credits to GDP growth is stronger thanforeign exchange (FX) credits where the latter is significant until 2015. iv) Public and domestic privatebanks are the main drivers of economic activity while the foreign banks are following them.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For policymakers, this result implies that the dynamicsof different credit types are crucial to analyze the impacts of credit cycles on economic activity.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This paper aims to investigate the co-movement between the credit growth and gross domestic product(GDP) growth in Turkey over the period January 2004eOctober 2019. By taking into account alternativecredit decomposition and the variations over time and across frequencies using the wavelet analysis, theresults show that: i) GDP growth highly synchronizes with credit growth compared to otherfinancialvariables such as stock exchange, bonds, and exchange rate. ii) There is a high correlation betweencommercial loan growth and capital formation and a relatively weak one with consumer loans andconsumption. iii) Co-movement stemming from Turkish Lira (TL) credits to GDP growth is stronger thanforeign exchange (FX) credits where the latter is significant until 2015. iv) Public and domestic privatebanks are the main drivers of economic activity while the foreign banks are following them. By showingthe differential effects of different types of credit on GDP growth, we specify that shocks to differentcredit types are crucial to analyze business cycles. For policymakers, this result implies that the dynamicsof different credit types are crucial to analyze the impacts of credit cycles on economic activity.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇEPNİ, O., HACIHASANOĞLU, Y. S., YILMAZ, M. H. (2020). Credit decomposition and economic activity in Turkey: A wavelet-based approach. Central Bank Review, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3, 109–131. https://ajindex.com/articles/212365

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Acaravci, A., Ozturk, I., Kakilli Acaravci, S., 2007. Finance growth nexus: evidencefrom Turkey. Int. Res. J. Finance Econ. 11, 30-40.
  2. Addison, P.S., 2017. The Illustrated Wavelet Transform Handbook: Introductory Theory and Applications in Science, Engineering, Medicine and Finance. CRCpress. Adrangi, B., Macri, J., 2011. Consumer confidence and aggregate consumption ex-penditures in the United States. Rev. Econ. Finance 1, 1-18.
  3. Aguiar-Conraria, L., Azevedo, N., Soares, M.J., 2008. Using wavelets to decomposethe timeefrequency effects of monetary policy. Phys. Stat. Mech. Appl. 387 (12),2863-2878.
  4. Akar, C., 2016. Analyzing the synchronization between thefinancial and businesscycles in Turkey. J. Rev. Global Econ. 5, 25-35.
  5. Akcelik, Y., Ermişoğlu, E., Oduncu, A., 2013. GDP Growth and Credit Data, vol. 13.Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey Working Paper, p. 27. Akkoyun, H.Ç., S ̧ en-Doğan, B., Günay, M., 2014. Business cycle synchronization ofTurkey with the Eurozone and the United States: what has changed since 2001?Emerg. Mark. Finance Trade 50 (4), 26-41.
  6. Aktan, B., Masood, O., 2010. The state of competition of the Turkish banking in-dustry: an application of the Panzar-Rosse model. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 11 (1),131-145.
  7. Alp, E., Seven, Ü., 2019. The dynamics of householdfinal consumption: the role ofwealth channel. Cent. Bank. Rev. 19 (1), 21-32.
  8. Ando, A., Modigliani, F., 1963. The" life cycle" hypothesis of saving: aggregate im-plications and tests. Am. Econ. Rev. 53 (1), 55-84.
  9. Antonakakis, N., Breitenlechner, M., Scharler, J., 2014. How strongly are businesscycles andfinancial cycles linked in the G7 countries? (No. 2014-07). In:Working Papers in Economics and Statistics. Antzoulatos, A.A., 1996. Consumer credit and consumption forecasts. Int. J. Forecast.12 (4), 439-453.
  10. Apergis, N., 2019. The role of the debt-service ratio as a leading indicator ofhouseholds consumption. Manch. Sch. 87 (6), 821-847.
  11. Arcand, J.L., Berkes, E., Panizza, U., 2015. Too muchfinance? J. Econ. Growth 20,105-148.
  12. Aslanoğlu, E., Çelik, S., 2010. An analysis of two leading indicators of economicgrowth in Turkey: monthly manufacturing industry output and CNBC-e con-sumption indices. Iktisat Isletme ve Finans 25 (293), 9-31.
  13. Avouyi Dovi, S., Matheron, J., 2005. Interactions between business cycles,financialcycles and monetary policy: stylised facts. BIS Papers No 22, 273-298.
  14. Aysan, A.F., Fendoğlu, S., Kilinc, M., 2015. Macroprudential policies as buffer againstvolatile cros