Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of Culture Method and Real-Time PCR for Detection of Vaginal Group B Streptococcus Colonization in Pregnant at the Last Trimester

Son Trimester Gebelerde Vajinal Grup B Streptokok Kolonizasyonunun Saptanmasında Kültür Yöntemi ile Gerçek Zamanlı Polimeraz Zincir Reaksiyonu Yönteminin Etkinliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
80–84
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, a statistically significant difference was found between these two methods by using Mac Nemar test (p<0.021).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it is aimed to evaluate effectiveness of the conventional culture method and PCR based molecular method in detecting the vaginal Group B Streptococcus (Streptococcus agalactiae) colonization during the third trimester of pregnancy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:One of the swabs was directly cultured by means of plating onto 5% sheep blood agar, while the other one was used for a real-time PCR assay.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, a statistically significant difference was found between these two methods by using Mac Nemar test (p<0.021).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:80 samples
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to evaluate effectiveness of the conventional culture method and PCR based molecular method in detecting the vaginal Group B Streptococcus (Streptococcus agalactiae) colonization during the third trimester of pregnancy. Two vaginal samples were obtained simultaneously from each consenting pregnant women by using sterile swabs. One of the swabs was directly cultured by means of plating onto 5% sheep blood agar, while the other one was used for a real-time PCR assay. A total of 80 samples were collected in which 64 (80%) samples were found negative by both the culture and PCR methods, whereas remaining 16 (%20) were positive by at least one of the two methods; six samples were positive in both methods, nine were positive with PCR only, and one was positive with culture only. In this study, a statistically significant difference was found between these two methods by using Mac Nemar test (p<0.021).

Özet

Bu çalışmada konvansiyonel kültür yöntemi ile Polimeraz Zincir Reaksiyonu (PZR) temelli moleküler yöntemin son trimester gebelerde vajinal Grup B streptokok (Streptococcus agalactiae) kolonizasyonunu amaçlanmıştır. Steril svablar kullanılarak gönüllü gebe kadınların her birinden iki ayrı vajinal sürüntü örneği alındı. Örneklerden biri doğrudan %5 koyun kanlı agara ekilerek kültüre edilirken diğer örnek Gerçek Zamanlı PZR yöntemiyle test edildi. Toplam 80 örneğin dâhil edildiği çalışmada 6 örnekte her iki yöntem ile bir örnekte sadece kültür yöntemi ve 9 örnekte sadece PZR ile olmak üzere toplam 16 (%20) örnekte pozitiflik saptanırken 64 örnek (%80) yöntemlerin her ikisi ile de negatif olarak değerlendirildi. Bu çalışmada, kullanılan iki yöntem arasında Mc Nemar testi ile istatiksel olarak anlamlı fark (p<0.021) bulundu.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALWEDYAN, S., GÜMRAL, R., GÖKTOLGA, Ü., ŞAHİNER, F., BEDİR, O., GÜÇLÜ, A. Ü., KILIÇ, A., BAŞUSTAOĞLU, A. C. (2014). Evaluation of Culture Method and Real-Time PCR for Detection of Vaginal Group B Streptococcus Colonization in Pregnant at the Last Trimester. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2, 80–84. https://ajindex.com/articles/211788

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Pettersson K. Perinatal infection with Group B streptococci. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2007; 12(3): 193-197. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 485: Prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal disease in newborns. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117(4): 1019-1027.
  2. Gibbs RS, Schrag S, Schuchat A. Perinatal infections due to group B streptococci. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 1062-1076.
  3. Natarajan G, Johnson YR, Zhang F, Chen KM, Worsham MJ. Real-time polymerase chain reaction for the rapid detection of group B streptococcal colonization in neonates. Pediatrics 2006; 118(1): 14-22.
  4. Daniels J, Gray J, Pattison H, et al. Rapid testing for group B streptococcus during labour: a test accuracy study with evaluation of acceptability and cost- effectiveness. Health Technol Assess 2009; 13(42): 1-154.
  5. Verani JR, McGee L, Schrag SJ. Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease--revised guidelines from CDC, MMWR Recomm Rep 2010; 59(RR-10): 1-36.
  6. El Aila NA, Tency I, Claeys G, et al. Comparison of culture with two different qPCR assays for detection of rectovaginal carriage of Streptococcus agalactiae (group B streptococci) in pregnant women. Res Microbiol 2011; 162(5): 499-505.
  7. Wei CF, She BC, Liang HS, et al. Prenatal Group B Streptococcus test using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 48(2): 116- 119. Towers CV, Rumney PJ, Asrat T, Preslicka C, Ghamsary MG, Nageotte MP. The accuracy of late third-trimester prenatal screening for group B streptococcus in predicting colonization at delivery. Am J Perinatol 2010; 27(10): 785-790.
  8. Valkenburg-van den Berg AW, Houtman-Roelofsen RL, Oostvogel PM, Dekker FW, Dörr PJ, Sprij AJ. Timing of group B streptococcus screening in pregnancy: a systematic review. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2010; 69(3): 174-183.
  9. Puopolo KM, Madoff LC, Eichenwald EC. Early-onset group B streptococcal disease in the era of maternal screening. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 1240-1246.
  10. El Helali N, Nguyen JC, Ly A, Giovangrandi Y, Trinquart L. Diagnostic accuracy of a rapid real- time polymerase chain reaction assay for universal intrapartum group B streptococcus screening. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 49(3): 417-423.
  11. Honest H, Sharma S, Khan KS. Rapid tests for group B Streptococcus colonization in laboring women: a systematic review.