Journals / ANKEM Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

Investigation of antibiotic resistance and some virulence factors of Escherichia coli strains isolated from children with urinary tract infections

İdrar yolu infeksiyonu olan çocuklardan izole edilen Escherichia coli suşlarında antibiyotik direnci ve çeşitli virulans faktörlerinin araştırılması

Pages
89–96
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, there was no significant difference in the frequency of virulence factors between inpatient and outpatient groups, but antibiotic resistance rates were generally higher in inpatient group, and multiple resistance and ESBL production were significantly higher in this group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, antibiotic resistance and some virulence factors of 179 E.coli strains (100 isolates from outpatients and 79 isolates from inpatients) were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The resistance rates for ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and co-trimoxazole were found to be high.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, there was no significant difference in the frequency of virulence factors between inpatient and outpatient groups, but antibiotic resistance rates were generally higher in inpatient group, and multiple resistance and ESBL production were significantly higher in this group.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çocuk · İlaç direnci · Escherichia coli

Abstract

In this study, antibiotic resistance and some virulence factors of 179 E.coli strains (100 isolates from outpatients and 79 isolates from inpatients) were investigated. The resistance rates for ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and co-trimoxazole were found to be high. The rates of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefazolin, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, cefepime and gentamicin resistance were found significantly higher in strains from inpatient group than those from outpatient group. Extended spectrum betalactamase (ESBL) producers were 13 % in inpatients’ and 1 % in outpatients’ isolates. The multiple resistance rates were found significantly higher in inpatient group (46 % /19 %). As virulence factors; hemolysin producers were found to be 46 % and 41 %; serum resistance to be 47 % and 37 %; type 1 fimbriae to be 11 % and 18 % in inpatient and outpatient groups, respectively. MRHA and MSHA were detected as 27 % and 20 %, and 18 % and 28 % in these two groups. The differences between two groups of strains for these properties were found to be insignificant. Hemagglutination types were similar in both groups; type IV-B (nonhemaglutinating type) and type V-A were found to be main types. Totally 29 strains gave hemagglutination patterns which are absent in classical table. In conclusion, there was no significant difference in the frequency of virulence factors between inpatient and outpatient groups, but antibiotic resistance rates were generally higher in inpatient group, and multiple resistance and ESBL production were significantly higher in this group.

Özet

İdrar yolu infeksiyonu şüphesi ile poliklinik hasta grubundan izole edilen 100 suş ve yatan hasta grubundan 79 suş olmak üzere toplam 179 E.coli suşunun antimikrobiyallere direnci ve çeşitli virulans özellikleri araştırılmıştır. Ampisiline, ampisilin-sulbaktama, amoksisilin-klavulanik asit ve kotrimoksazole yüksek oranda direnç saptanmıştır. Amoksisilin-klavulanik asit, sefazolin, sefuroksim, seftriakson, sefepim ve gentamisin direnci yatan hasta grubundan izole edilen suşlarda poliklinik hastalarından izole edilenlere göre anlamlı olarak yüksek bulunmuştur. Yatan hasta grubunda % 13, poliklinik hasta grubunda % 1 oranında genişlemiş spektrumlu betalaktamaz (GSBL) saptanmıştır. Yatan hasta grubunda anlamlı olarak daha fazla çoklu dirençli suşa (% 46/ % 19) rastlanmıştır. Virülans faktörleri olarak, yatan ve poliklinik hasta gruplarında sırasıyla; % 46 ve % 41 oranında hemolizin; % 47 ve % 37 oranında serumun bakterisid etkisine direnç; % 11 ve % 18 oranında tip 1 fimbriya saptanmıştır. Yatan ve poliklinik hastalarından izole edilen suşlarda MRHA ve MSHA oranı sırasıyla % 27, % 20 ve % 18, % 28 olarak tespit edilmiştir. Bu özellikler bakımından iki grup suş arasında anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır. Hemaglütinasyon tiplemesi sonucu iki grupta da suşların daha çok tip IV-B (hemaglütinasyon negatif) ve tip V-A olduğu görülmüştür. Toplam 29 suş klasik tabloda bulunmayan hemaglütinasyon paternleri göstermiştir. Yatan ve poliklinik hasta grubunda E.coli suşlarının virulans faktörleri açısından anlamlı farklı bulunmadığı fakat hastane kaynaklı suşlarda direnç oranlarının genellikle daha yüksek olduğu, çoklu dirence ve GSBL oluşturan suşlara daha fazla rastlandığı dikkat çekmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

İNAN, U. N., GÜRLER, N. (2004). Investigation of antibiotic resistance and some virulence factors of Escherichia coli strains isolated from children with urinary tract infections. ANKEM Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 89–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/211779

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alon U,Davidai G, Berant M,Merzbach D: Five–year survey of changing patterns of susceptibility of bacterial uropathogens to trimethoprim– sulfamethoxazole and other antimicrobial agents, Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1987;31:126-8
  2. Beutin L: The different hemolysins of Escherichia coli, Med Microbiol Immunol 1991;180:167-82
  3. Beutin L, Montenegro MA, Orskov I, Orskov F, Prada J, Zimmermann S, StephanR:Close association of verotoxin (Shiga-LikeToxin) production with enterohemolysin production in strains of Escherichia coli, J Clin Microbiol 1989;27:2559-64
  4. Chon CH, Lai FC, Shortliffe LMD: Pediatric urinary tract infections, Pediatric Clin NAm 2001;48:1441-59
  5. Connell H, Agace W, Klemm P, Schembri M, Marild S, Svanborg C: Type 1 fimbrial expression enhances Escherichia coli virulence for the urinary tract, Proc Natl Acad Sci 1996;93:9827-32
  6. Coşar G: Üropatojen Escherichia coli suşlarının antibiyotik duyarlılıkları,hemoliz ve insan 0 grubu eritrositler ile hemaglütinasyon özellikleri,İnfeksiyon Derg 1988;2:55-60
  7. Çetin BD,Gündüz A, Şensoy A,Korkmaz F, Seber E:Hastane infeksiyonu etkeni Gram negatif çomaklarda genişlemiş spektrumlu beta–laktamaz üretimi ve antibiyotiklere duyarlılık özellikleri, Türk Mikrobiyol Cem Derg 2001;31:41-5
  8. Duguid JP,Clegg S,WilsonMI: The fimbrial and nonfimbrial hemagglutinins of Escherichia coli, J Med Microbiol 1979;12:213-27
  9. Eisenstein BI, Zaleznik DF: Enterobacteriaceace, “Mandell GL, Bennett JE,Dolin R (eds):Mandell,Douglas andBennett’s Principles and Practice of InfectiousDiseases, 5.baskı” kitabında s. 2294-301,Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia (2000)
  10. Erayman İ, Erayman B, Arıbaş ET: İdrar örneklerinden izole edilen Gram negatif bakterilerin antibiyotik duyarlılıkları, ANKEM Derg 2001;15:164
  11. Evans DJ, Evans DG, Dupont HL: Hemagglutination patterns of enterotoxigenic and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli determined with human, bovine, chicken and guinea pig erythrocytes in the presence and absence of mannose, Infect Immun 1979;23:336-46
  12. Evans DJ, Evans DG, Young LS, Pitt J: Hemagglutination typing of Escherichia coli: Definition of seven hemagglutination types, J Clin Microbiol 1980;12:235-42
  13. Foxman B, Zhang L, Palin K, Tallman P, Marrs CF: Bacterial virulence characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from first- time urinary tract infection, J Infect Dis 1995;171:1514-21
  14. Grennwood D, Slack R, Pentherer J: Medical Microbiology, 15.baskı, s. 267-75, Churchill Livingstone,