SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Urological Surgery / 2016 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4

Ambicor® Penil Protez, Kavernöz Alan Yetersizliği Olan Olgularda Tek Parça Olarak Kullanılabilir mi? İki Olguluk Tecrübe

Can Ambicor® Penile Prosthesis be Used in One Piece in Patients with Inadequate Cavernous Structure? Our Experience of Two Cases

FATİH AKDEMİR
ÖNDER KAYIGİL
EMRAH OKULU
Pages
144–147
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this article, we present the method we used in two patients in whom twopieces Ambicor® penile prosthesis implantation was planned but could not be carried out due to the insufficient size and diameter of the penile cavernous structures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Penile prosthesis implantation, which is practiced with high satisfaction and success rates in patients with erectile dysfunction today, is an invasive procedure carried out by implanting various models of the prostheses into the cavernosal tissue.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Penile prosthesis implantation may sometimes prove difficult in cases with small penis in size and diameter.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this article, we present the method we used in two patients in whom twopieces Ambicor® penile prosthesis implantation was planned but could not be carried out due to the insufficient size and diameter of the penile cavernous structures.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Penile prosthesis implantation, which is practiced with high satisfaction and success rates in patients with erectile dysfunction today, is an invasive procedure carried out by implanting various models of the prostheses into the cavernosal tissue. Penile prosthesis implantation may sometimes prove difficult in cases with small penis in size and diameter. In this article, we present the method we used in two patients in whom twopieces Ambicor® penile prosthesis implantation was planned but could not be carried out due to the insufficient size and diameter of the penile cavernous structures.

Özet

Günümüzde erektil disfonksiyonlu hastalarda yüksek memnuniyet ve başarı oranları ile uygulanan penil protez implantasyonu çeşitli modellerdeki protezlerin kavernozal doku içerisine yerleştirilmesi şeklinde yapılan invaziv bir işlemdir. Boyut ve çap olarak küçük penisi olan olgularda penil protez implantasyonu uygulanması kimi zaman zorluklar oluşturabilir. Biz bu yazımızda iki parçalı Ambicor® penil protez implantasyonu için operasyona aldığımız ancak penil kavernozal yapılarının boy ve çap olarak yetersiz olmasından dolayı protez implantasyonu tam olarak yapılamayan iki olguda uyguladığımız yöntemi sunduk.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKDEMİR, F., KAYIGİL, Ö., OKULU, E. (2016). Ambicor® Penil Protez, Kavernöz Alan Yetersizliği Olan Olgularda Tek Parça Olarak Kullanılabilir mi? İki Olguluk Tecrübe. Journal of Urological Surgery, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 4, 144–147. https://ajindex.com/articles/211034

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The International index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 1997;49:822-830.
  2. Althof SE, Corty EW, Levine SB, Levine F, Burnett AL, McVary K, Stecher V, Seftel AD. EDITS: development of questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction with treatments for erectile dysfunction. Urology 1999;53:793-799.
  3. Woodworth BE, Carson CC, Webster GD. Inflatable penile prosthesis: effect of device modification on functional longevity. Urology 1991;38:533-536.
  4. Bettocchi C, Palumbo F, Spilotros M, Lucarelli G, Palazzo S, Battaglia M, Selvaggi FP, Ditonno P. Patient and partner satisfaction after AMS inflatable prostheses implant. J Sex Med 2010;7:304-309.
  5. Natali A, Olianas R, Fisch M. Penile implantation in Europe: successes and complications with 253 implants in Italy and Germany. J Sex Med 2008;5:1503-1512.
  6. Montorsi F, Rigatti P, Carmignani G, Corbu C, Campo B, Ordesi G, Breda G, Silvestre P, Giammusso B, Morgia G, Graziottin A. AMS three- piece inflatable implants for erectile dysfunction: a long-term multi- institutional study in 200 consecutive patients. Eur Urol 2000;37:50-55.
  7. Bettocchi C, Ditonno P, Palumbo F, Lucarelli G, Garaffa G, Giammusso B, Battaglia M. Penile prosthesis: what should we do about complications? Adv Urol 2008;560-573.
  8. Minervini A, Ralph DJ, Pryor JD. Outcome of penile prosthesis implantation for treating erectile dysfunction: experience with 504 procedure. BJU Inter 2006;97:129-133.
  9. Govier FE, Gibbons RP, Correa RJ, Pritchett TR, Kramer-Levien D. Mechanical reliability, surgical complications, and patient and partner satisfaction of the modern three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis. Urology 1998;52:282-286. Oksay T. Penil protezlerin gözden geçirilmesi ve gelişmeler. S.D.Ü. Tıp Fak. Derg 2010;17:32-37.
  10. Rolle L, Ceruti C, Timpano M, Sedigh O, Destefanis P, Galletto E, Falcone M, Fontana D. A new, innovative, lengthening surgical procedure for Peyronie's disease by penile prosthesis implantation with double dorsal- ventral patch graft: the "sliding technique". J Sex Med 2012;9:2389- 2395. Ralph D, Gonzalez-Cadavid N, Mirone V, Perovic S, Sohn M, Usta M, Levine L. The management of Peyronie's disease: evidence-based 2010 guidelines. J Sex Med 2010;7:2359-2374.
  11. Sansalone S, Garaffa G, Djinovic R, Antonini G, Vespasiani G, Ieria FP, Cimino S, Loreto C, Ralph DJ. Simultaneous total corporal reconstruction and implantation of