SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

Performance Comparison of Tetrolet Transform and Wavelet-Based Transforms for Medical Image Denoising

MURAT CEYLAN
AYŞE ELİF CANBİLEN
Pages
222–231
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, it is seen that curvelet transforms are effectively produce the best results for all rates of noise on medical images

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Noise reduces the quality of medical images and raise the difficulties of diagnosis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Performances of the transforms are compared by using peak signal to noise ratio, mean square error, mean structural similarity index and feature similarity index.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, it is seen that curvelet transforms are effectively produce the best results for all rates of noise on medical images
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Noise reduces the quality of medical images and raise the difficulties of diagnosis. Although the wavelet transform has already been used in medical noise removal applications extensively, there are many other multi-resolution analysis methods proposed in recent years for denoising. The main goal of this study is comparing the image denoising abilities of some of these methods with wavelet transform. In this paper, image denoising is implemented by a three-stage methodology. Effectiveness of the multiresolution analysis methodologies has been investigated for standard test images beside magnetic resonans, mammography and fundus images. Performances of the transforms are compared by using peak signal to noise ratio, mean square error, mean structural similarity index and feature similarity index. The best results are obtained by tetrolet transform for random and rician noiseswith the benchmark images. Medical image denoising performance of Tetrolet transform is compared to other multiresolution analysis methods for the first time in the literature with this study. It surpassed ridgelet and haar wavelet transforms while the noise ratio was low. On the other hand, it is seen that curvelet transforms are effectively produce the best results for all rates of noise on medical images

🔖

Cite This Article

CEYLAN, M., CANBİLEN, A. E. (2017). Performance Comparison of Tetrolet Transform and Wavelet-Based Transforms for Medical Image Denoising. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 222–231. https://ajindex.com/articles/210241

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. S. Mallat, “A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation,”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 11, pp. 674–693,1989
  2. I. Daubechies, “Ten lectures on wavelets”,PA: SIAM, Philadelphia, 1992
  3. M. Lang, H. Guo, J.E. Odegard, C.S. Burrus, R.O. Wells,“Noise reduction using an undecimated discrete wavelet transform,”IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 3,pp. 10-12, 1996
  4. A. Mojsilovic, M. Popovic, D. Sevic, “Classification of the ultrasound liver images with the 2N x 1-D wavelet transform,”Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Laussanne, Switzerland, 1996,pp. 367-370
  5. I. Delakis, O. Hammad, R.I. Kitney,“Wavelet-based denoising algorithm for images acquired with parallel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI),” Physics in Medicine And Biology, vol. 52, pp. 3741- 3751, 2007
  6. V. Kidsumran, W. Chiracharit, “Contrast enhancement mammograms using denoising in wavelet coefficients,”10th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, Maha Sarakham, Tayland, 2013, pp. 82-86
  7. E. Candes, D.L. Donoho, “Ridgelets: the key to high-dimensional intermittency,”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, vol. 357, pp. 2495–2509, 1999
  8. M.N. Do, M. Vetterli, “The finite ridgelet transform for image representation,”IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,vol. 12,pp. 16-28, 2003
  9. X. Wang, “Wrap-around effect removal finite ridgelet transform for multiscale image denoising,”Pattern Recognition, vol. 43, pp. 3693- 3698, 2010. [10]F. Makhlouf, N. Khlifa, H. Besbes, C. B. Amar, B.Soulaiman, “A comparative study of multiresolution methods to reduce the noise in scintigraphic images,”International Conference on Computer Medical Applications, Sousse, Tunis, 2013, pp. 1-5. [11]H. Yaşar, M. Ceylan, A.E. Öztürk, “Comparison of real and complexvalued versions of wavelet transform, curvelet transform and ridgelet transform for medical image denoising,”IJEMME, vol.3,pp. 427-436, 2013. [12]E.J. Candes, D.L. Donoho, “Curvelets - a surprisingly effective nonadaptive representation for objects with edges”, in: Cohen A, Rabut C, Schumaker LL, eds. Curve and surface fitting: Saint Malo 1999. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 2000. [13]D.L. Donoho, M.R. Duncan, “Digital curvelet transform: strategy, implementation and experiments,”Proceedings of SPIE: Wavelet Application VII, vol. 4056,pp. 12-30, 2000, DOI:10.1117/12.381679. [14]E.J. Candes