Journals / Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

Potential Predictive Factors for Breast Cancer Subtypes from a North Cyprus Cohort Analysis

Pages
339–349
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further steps include exploring potential biomarkers and using cure models to determine long-term breast cancer survivors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND/AIMS We present the first epidemiological survey from North Cyprus to determine the predictive factors for breast cancer subtypes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIAL and METHODS More than 300 patients with breast cancer, with 90% of them having the cancer subtype information, were examined at the State Hospital in Nicosia between 2006 and 2015 for their demographic, reproductive, genetic, and epidemiological factors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further steps include exploring potential biomarkers and using cure models to determine long-term breast cancer survivors.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

BACKGROUND/AIMS We present the first epidemiological survey from North Cyprus to determine the predictive factors for breast cancer subtypes. MATERIAL and METHODS More than 300 patients with breast cancer, with 90% of them having the cancer subtype information, were examined at the State Hospital in Nicosia between 2006 and 2015 for their demographic, reproductive, genetic, and epidemiological factors. The breast cancer subtypes and the estrogen receptor (ER) +/- progesterone receptor (PR) +/- and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) +/- status were determined. Single and multiple variable regularized regressions, with predictive factors as independent variables and breast cancer subtypes as dependent variables, were conducted. RESULTS Our cohort differed significantly from larger cohorts (e.g., the Breast Cancer Family Registry) in terms of age, menopause status, age at menarche, parity, education, oral contraceptive use, and breastfeeding, but the distribution of breast cancer subtypes was not significantly different. The subtype distribution in our cohort was also not different from that of another Turkish cohort. We found that the ER+ subtype was positively related to age/postmenopause, ER+/PR+ subtype was associated positively with age but negatively with cancer stage, and HER2+ subtype that negatively correlated with ER+ and ER+/PR+ was associated positively with cancer stage but negatively with age/postmenopause. CONCLUSION Assuming ER+ and ER+/PR+ to have better prognostic, HER+ to have worse prognostic, then older age and postmenopause seem to be beneficial, smoking and family history of cancer seem to be detrimental. Further steps include exploring potential biomarkers and using cure models to determine long-term breast cancer survivors.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULGEN, A., GÜRKUT, Ö., LII, W. (2020). Potential Predictive Factors for Breast Cancer Subtypes from a North Cyprus Cohort Analysis. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 339–349. https://ajindex.com/articles/210206

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Dyba T, Randi G, Bettio M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018. Euro J Cancer 2018; 103: 356-87. [Crossref] 2. McPherson K, Steel CM, Dixon JM. Breast cancer-epidemiology, risk factors, and genetics. BMJ 2000; 321(7261): 624-8. [Crossref] 3. Möller S, Mucci LA, Harris JR, Scheike T, Holst K, Halekoh U, et al. The heritability of breast cancer among women in the Nordic twin study of cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016; 25(1): 145-50. [Crossref] 4. Mavaddat N, Michailidou K, Dennis J, Lush M, Fachal L, Lee A, et al. Polygenic risk scores for prediction of breast cancer and breast cancer subtypes. Am J of Hum Genet 2019; 104(1): 21-34. 5. Shieh Y, Scott CG, Jensen MR, Norman AD, Bertrand KA, Pankratz VS, et al. Body Mass Index, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk by estrogen receptor subtype. Breast Cancer Res 2019; 21(1): 48. [Crossref] 6. Lee A, Mavaddat N, Wilcox AN, Cunningham AP, Carver T, Hartley S, et al. BOADICEA: a comprehensive breast cancer risk prediction model incorporating genetic and nongenetic risk factors. Genet Med 2019; 21(8): 1708-18. [Crossref] 7. Fisher ER, Redmond CK, Liu H, Rockette H, Fisher B. Correlation of estrogen receptor and pathologic characteristics of invasive breast cancer. Cancer 1980; 45(2): 349-53. [Crossref] 8. Lehmann BD, Bauer JA, Chen X, Sanders ME, Chakravarthy AB, Shyr Y, et al. Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies. J Clin Invest 2011; 121(7): 2750-67. [Crossref] 9. Özmen V, Özmen T, Doğru V. Breast cancer in Turkey; an analysis of 20,000 patients with breast cancer. Euro J Breast Health 2019; 15(3): 141-6. [Crossref] 10. Martinez ME, Cruz GI, Brewster AM, Bondy ML, Thompson PA. What can we learn about disease etiology from case-case analyses? Lessons from breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010; 19(11): 2710-4. [Crossref] 11. Redondo CM, Gago-Dominguez M, Ponte SM, Castelo ME, Jiang X, García AA, et al. Breast feeding, parity and breast cancer subtypes in a Spanish cohort. PLoS ONE 2012; 7(7): e40543. [Crossref] 12. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J Stat Software 2010; 33(1): 1-22. [Crossref] 13. Van der Maaten LJ, Hinton GE. Visualizing data using t-SNE. J. Machine Learning Res 2008; 9: 2575-605. 14. Li