Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 54

DETERMINATION OF THE IMPACT BEHAVIOUR OF JUTE FABRIC AND WOOL FELT BASED COMPOSITES

JÜT KUMAŞ VE YÜN KEÇE ESASLI KOMPOZİTLERİN DARBE DAVRANIŞININ BELİRLENMESİ

Pages
513–520
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results Show that the damage of the composite reinforced with wool felt has seen to be less at the same energy level

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the impact behavior of the two composites reinforced with jute fabric and wool felt is investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to increase the surface adhesion properties, the jute fabrics have been retained in 10% NaOH solution for 4 hours, then have been dried at room temperature.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results Show that the damage of the composite reinforced with wool felt has seen to be less at the same energy level
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Jüt kumaş · Yün keçe · Doğal lifli kompozit

Abstract

In this study, the impact behavior of the two composites reinforced with jute fabric and wool felt is investigated. In order to increase the surface adhesion properties, the jute fabrics have been retained in 10% NaOH solution for 4 hours, then have been dried at room temperature. No treatment of the wool felt was undertaken. Composites are produced by vacuum infusion method with the same thickness. To measure the impact resistances, the composites are tested under three different energy levels. Impact behaviors of composites were evaluated by comparing load–deflection graphs and images of impacted specimens. Results Show that the damage of the composite reinforced with wool felt has seen to be less at the same energy level

Özet

Bu çalışmada jüt kumaş ve yün keçe takviyeli üretilen iki kompozitin darbe davranışları araştırılmıştır. Yüzey yapışma özelliklerinin arttırılması için jüt kumaşlar %10 NaOH çözeltisinde 4 saat bekletilmiş daha sonra oda sıcaklığında kurumaya bırakılmıştır. Yün keçe hiçbir işleme tabi tutulmamıştır. Kompozitler vakum infüzyon yöntemi ile aynı kalınlıkta üretilmiştir. Darbe dayanımlarının belirlenmesi amacı ile kompozit numuneler üç enerji seviyesinde test edilmiştir. Kompozitlerin darbe dayanımları hem kuvvet–çökme grafikleri hem de darbeli numune görüntüleri karşılaştırılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Sonuçlar, aynı darbe yükü altında yün keçe takviyeli kompozitte hasarın daha az olduğunu göstermiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZES, Ç., TAŞKIN, A. E. (2016). DETERMINATION OF THE IMPACT BEHAVIOUR OF JUTE FABRIC AND WOOL FELT BASED COMPOSITES. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 54, 513–520. https://ajindex.com/articles/210097

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ku H, Wang H, Pattarachaiyakoop N, Trada M. A Review on the Tensile Properties of Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites, Composites: Part B, Cilt. 42, 2011, s. 856–873.
  2. Amada S, Untao S. Fracture Properties of Bamboo. Composites: Part B, Cilt. 32, No.5, 2001, s.451–459.
  3. Bhoopathi R, Ramesh M, Deepa C. Fabrication and Property Evaluation of Banana- Hemp-Glass Fiber Reinforced Composites, Procedia Engineering, Cilt. 97, 2014, s. 2032–2041.
  4. Goda K, Sreekala M S, Gomes A, Kaji T, Ohgi J. Improvement of Plant Based Natural Fibers for Toughening Green Composites – Effect of Load Application During Mercerization of Ramie Fibres, Composite: Part A, Cilt. 37, 2006, s. 2213–2220.
  5. Mohanty, A.K., Misra, M., Drzal, L.T., Selke, S.E., Harte, B.R., Hinrichsen, G. (2005).
  6. An Introduction in Natural Fibres, Mohanty, A.K., Misra, M., Drzal, L.T., (eds.), Natural Fibres, Biopolymers, and Biocomposites. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, p. 1–36.
  7. Olusegun D S, Stephen A, Timothy A. A. Assessing Mechanical Properties of Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites for Engineering Applications, Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, Cilt.11, 2012, s. 780-784.
  8. Cheung H, Ho M, Lau K, Cardona F, Hui D. Natural Fibre-Reinforced Composites for Bioengineering and Environmental Engineering Applications, Composites: Part B, Cilt. 40, 2009, s. 655–663.
  9. Barreto A C H, Rosa D S, Fechine P B A., Mazzetto S E. Properties of Sisal Fibers Treated by Alkali Solution and Their Application into Cardanol-Based Biocomposites, Composites Part A, Cilt. 42, 2011, s.492–500.
  10. Andersons J, Joffe R. Estimation of Tensile Strength of an Oriented Flax Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composite, Composites Part A, Cilt. 42, No.9, 2011, s.1229–1235.
  11. Liang S, Gning P B, Guillaumat L. A Comparative Study of Fatigue Behaviour of Flax/Epoxy and Glass/Epoxy Composites, Composites Science and Technology, Cilt. 72, 2012, s. 535–43.
  12. Santulli C, Sarasini F, Tirillò J, Valente T,Valente M, Caruso A P, Infantino M, Nisini E, Minak G. Mechanical Behaviour of Jute Cloth/Wool Felts Hybrid Laminates, Materials and Design, Cilt. 50, 2013, s.309–321.
  13. Li, X., Tabil, L.G., Panigrahi, S. Chemical Treatments of Natural Fiber for Use in Natural Fiber-Reinforced Composites: A Review, Journal of Polymers and the Environment, Cilt. 15,2007, s. 25-33.
  14. Joshi S V, Drzali L T, Mohanty A K, Arora S. Are Natural Fiber Composites Environmentally Superior to Glass Fiber Reinforced Composites, Composite Part A, Cilt. 35,