Journals / Journal of Turkish Science Education / 2010 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Pre-service teachers’ views about their competencies in biology applications

Pages
37–46
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study results showed that pre-service teachers found themselves “partially competent” in “using effectively the instruments in the biology laboratory” and “teaching the subjects covering laboratory techniques and methods” ( =3.33; =3.29, respectively).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examined the perceptions of pre-service biology teachers about their competencies in biology applications.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data were collected between the years of 2003-2007 period, each year with a different group consisting of 30 pre-service biology teachers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study results showed that pre-service teachers found themselves “partially competent” in “using effectively the instruments in the biology laboratory” and “teaching the subjects covering laboratory techniques and methods” ( =3.33; =3.29, respectively).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003-2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study examined the perceptions of pre-service biology teachers about their competencies in biology applications. The study was conducted on pre-service biology teachers who have taken all application courses since the first year of the university. One hundred and fifty pre-service biology teachers participated in the study. The data were collected between the years of 2003-2007 period, each year with a different group consisting of 30 pre-service biology teachers. The pre-service teachers were asked how competent they perceived themselves in effectively using the instruments in the biology laboratory, in teaching the subjects covering laboratory techniques and methods, ensuring maintenance of the instruments in the biology laboratory and establishment of a biology laboratory in a secondary education institution. The responses were on a 5-point Likert type scale, ranging from 5 (quite competent) to 1 (quite incompetent). In addition, by means of two open-ended questions, the students were asked if they considered themselves inadequate, and if they felt themselves inadequate, whether or not they had suggestions to overcome their inadequacy. The responses were analyzed by using content analysis procedures. The study results showed that pre-service teachers found themselves “partially competent” in “using effectively the instruments in the biology laboratory” and “teaching the subjects covering laboratory techniques and methods” ( =3.33; =3.29, respectively). Moreover; a significant, positive relationship was found between pre-service teachers’ scores on “using effectively the instruments in the biology laboratory” and “teaching the subjects covering laboratory techniques and methods” (r=0.73, p=0.01).

🔖

Cite This Article

ATAV, E., ALTUNOĞLU, B. D. (2010). Pre-service teachers’ views about their competencies in biology applications. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 37–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/209952

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Abraham, M.R., Williamson, V.M., & Westbrook, S. L. (1994). A cross-age study of the understanding of five chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 147 – 165. BouJaoude, S. (1993, April). Students' systematic errors when solving chemical equilibrium problems. Paper presented at the NARST, Atlanta. Bozkoyun, Y. (2004). Facilitating conceptual change in learning rate of reaction concepts. Unpublished master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara,
  2. Turkey. Brown, T. L., LeMay, H. E., & Bursten, B.E. (2006). Chemistry the central science, 10th Ed, USA: Pearson Education, Inc. Camacho, M., & Good, R. (1989). Problem solving and chemical equilibrium: successful vs. Unsuccessful performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(3), 251 – 272. Çakmakçı, G. (2005). A cross-sectional study of the understanding of chemical kinetics among Turkish secondary and undergraduate students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. Çakmakçı, G., Leach, J., & Donnelly, J. (2006). Students’ ideas about reaction rate and its relationship with concentration or pressure. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1795–1815.
  3. Doymuş, K. (2008). Teaching chemical equilibrium with the jigsaw technique. Research in Science Education, 38(2), 249-260.
  4. Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61–84.
  5. Ebenezer, J.V., & Ericson, G.L. (1996). Chemistry students’ conceptions of solubility: A phenomenography. Science Education, 80(2), 181–201.
  6. Gabel, D.L., Samuel, K.V., & Hunn, D. (1987). Understanding the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 64(8), 695–697.
  7. Garnet, P.J. (1992). Conceptual difficulties experienced by senior high school students of electrochemistry. Electric circuits and oxidation reduction equations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 121 – 142. Gussarsky, E., & Gorodetsky, M. (1988). On the chemical equilibrium concept: Constrained word associations and conception. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(5), 319 – 333. Hackling, M. W., & Garnett, P. J. (1985). Misconceptions of chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 7(2), 205-214.
  8. Haidar, H.A., & Abraham, R.M. (1991). A comparison of applied and theoretical knowledge of concept based on the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Research in Scie