Journals / Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences / 2014 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

Reservoir characterization of the Burqan Formation sandstone from Midyan Basin, northwestern Saudi Arabia

Pages
204–214
Publication Date
2014-05-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The potential of the studied sandstone to serve as a reservoir is strongly related to sandstone diagenesis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Early Miocene sandstone of the Burqan Formation from Midyan Basin is considered an oil-bearing unit.
📊
Key Findings & Data:During the field work, 81 surface samples were collected for reservoir characterization.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The potential of the studied sandstone to serve as a reservoir is strongly related to sandstone diagenesis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Saudi Arabia · Midyan Basin · deep marine sandstone

Abstract

The Early Miocene sandstone of the Burqan Formation from Midyan Basin is considered an oil-bearing unit. The outcrops of this sandstone, which are exposed in the northwestern part of the basin, have been studied through field and laboratory-based investigations. During the field work, 81 surface samples were collected for reservoir characterization. Laboratory analyses were undertaken to determine the effect of the diagenesis on the reservoir quality using integrated sedimentological, petrological, and petrophysical analyses. According to these analyses, the sandstone of Burqan Formation is predominately subarkosic and sublitharenite in nature, medium to course grained in size, rounded to subangular in shape, and poor to moderately sorted. Porosity of the studied sandstone, which is both syndepositional and diagenetic in origin, has been determined as poor to very high, with an average value of 22.73%. The observed permeability is moderate to very high, with an average estimate of 2444.2 millidarcy. Cementation coupled with compaction had an important effect on the porosity destruction after sedimentation and burial. The reservoir quality of the studied sandstone is reduced by clay minerals (kaolinite and smectite), calcite, and silica cementations, but, on other hand, it is increased by alteration and dissolution of the unstable grains, in addition to partial dissolution of calcite cements. The potential of the studied sandstone to serve as a reservoir is strongly related to sandstone diagenesis.

Özet

The Early Miocene sandstone of the Burqan Formation from Midyan Basin is considered an oil-bearing unit. The outcrops of this sandstone, which are exposed in the northwestern part of the basin, have been studied through field and laboratory-based investigations. During the field work, 81 surface samples were collected for reservoir characterization. Laboratory analyses were undertaken to determine the effect of the diagenesis on the reservoir quality using integrated sedimentological, petrological, and petrophysical analyses. According to these analyses, the sandstone of Burqan Formation is predominately subarkosic and sublitharenite in nature, medium to course grained in size, rounded to subangular in shape, and poor to moderately sorted. Porosity of the studied sandstone, which is both syndepositional and diagenetic in origin, has been determined as poor to very high, with an average value of 22.73%. The observed permeability is moderate to very high, with an average estimate of 2444.2 millidarcy. Cementation coupled with compaction had an important effect on the porosity destruction after sedimentation and burial. The reservoir quality of the studied sandstone is reduced by clay minerals (kaolinite and smectite), calcite, and silica cementations, but, on other hand, it is increased by alteration and dissolution of the unstable grains, in addition to partial dissolution of calcite cements. The potential of the studied sandstone to serve as a reservoir is strongly related to sandstone diagenesis.

🔖

Cite This Article

AL-LABOUN, A., AL-QURAISHI, A., ZAMAN, H., BENAAFI, M. (2014). Reservoir characterization of the Burqan Formation sandstone from Midyan Basin, northwestern Saudi Arabia. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 204–214. https://ajindex.com/articles/209907

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Al-Rifaiy I, Cherif O (1988).
  2. The fossil coral reefs of Al-Aqaba, Jordon. Facies 18: 219–230.
  3. Alsharhan A, Nairn A (2003). Sedimentary Basin and Petroleum Geology of the Middle East. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier. Bayer H, Hotzl H, Jado A, Roscher B, Voggenereitter W (1988). Sedimentary and structural evolution of the northwestern Arabian Red Sea margin. Tectonophysics: 153: 137–151.
  4. Boggs S (2009). Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Bokhari M (1981). Explanatory Notes to the Reconnaissance Geological Map of Magna Quadrangle, Sheet 28/34 D, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabian Directorate General of Mineral Resources Open File Report DGMR-OF-01-16.
  6. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Saudi Arabian Directorate General of Mineral Resources. Bogue R (1953). Geologic Reconnaissance of Northwestern Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia Directorate General of Mineral Resources Open File Report DGMR-OF-01-05.
  7. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Saudi Arabian Directorate General of Mineral Resources. Bouma A (1962). Sedimentology of Some Flysch Deposits. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier. Bouma A (2000). Coarse-grained and fine-grained turbidite systems as end member models: applicability and dangers. Marine and Petroleum Geol 17: 137–143.
  8. Chilingarian G, Wolf K (1988). Diagenesis I. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier. Clark M (1986). Explanatory Notes to the Geological Map of Al-bad Quadrangle, Sheet 28a, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabian Deputy Ministry for Mineral Resources Geosciences Map Series GM81A, C, Scale 1:250000. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Saudi Arabian Deputy Ministry for Mineral Resources. Crossley R, Raven M, Cripps D, Carnell A, Williams D (1992). The sedimentary evolution of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden. J Petroleoum Geol 15: 157–172.
  9. Donaldson E, Tiab D (2004). Petrophysics: Theory and Practice of Measuring Reservoir and Fluid Transport Properties. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier. Filatoff J, Hughes G (1996). Late Cretaceous to recent paleoenvironments of Saudi Arabian Red Sea. J African Earth Sci 22: 535–548.
  10. Gardner W, Khan MA, Al-Hinai K (1996). Interpretation of the Midyan and Sinai geology from Landsat TM image. Arabian J Sci Eng 21: 571–586.
  11. Hughes G, Filatoff J (1995). New biostratigraphic constraints on Saudi Arabian Red Sea pre- and syn-rift sequences. GeoArabia 2: 517– 5 Hughes G, Johnson R (2005). Lithostratigraphy of the Red Sea region. GeoArabia 10: 40–126.
  12. Hughes G, Perincek D, Grainger DJ, Abu-Bshait A, Jarad A