Journals / Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1

TO WHAT EXTENT IS IT POSSIBLE TO CONDUCT MINING ACTIVITIES IN AGRICULTURAL AREAS AND ESPECIALLY OLIVE GROVES: SOLUTION EXPECTATIONS OF ENTERPRISES

TARIM ALANLARINDA VE ÖZELLİKLE ZEYTİNLİK ALANLARDA MADEN İŞLETME FAALİYETLERİNİN GERÇEKLEŞTİRİLMESİ NE DERECE MÜMKÜNDÜR: İŞLETMELERİN ÇÖZÜM BEKLENTİSİ

Pages
183–208
Publication Date
2021-05-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is expected for necessary regulations to be made in the Turkish mining legislation by taking the applications of the countries, which have a coast to the Mediterranean and are developed in terms of olive industry, into account.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Overlapping of mining areas and agricultural areas can occur frequently.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of the amendment made in Article 20 (1) of this Law in 1995, the following provision was envisaged: “Except for the olive oil factory located within the olive grove and at least 3 kilometers (km) from these fields, the facility that leaves chemical waste, dust and fumes that can prevent the vegetative and generative development of olive groves cannot be built and operated.” However, in practice, it is observed that mining is not allowed within 3 km without examining whether mining will prevent the vegetative and generative development of olive groves.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is expected for necessary regulations to be made in the Turkish mining legislation by taking the applications of the countries, which have a coast to the Mediterranean and are developed in terms of olive industry, into account.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Arazi · Çevresel Etki Değerlendirmesi · Hukuk

Abstract

Overlapping of mining areas and agricultural areas can occur frequently. In agricultural areas, the most common problems in mining occur in olive groves. In the case of overlapping of mining areas and olive fields, the “Law on Breeding of Olives and Vaccination of Wilds” (Olive Law) is taken into consideration. As a result of the amendment made in Article 20 (1) of this Law in 1995, the following provision was envisaged: “Except for the olive oil factory located within the olive grove and at least 3 kilometers (km) from these fields, the facility that leaves chemical waste, dust and fumes that can prevent the vegetative and generative development of olive groves cannot be built and operated.” However, in practice, it is observed that mining is not allowed within 3 km without examining whether mining will prevent the vegetative and generative development of olive groves. Thus, when these banned areas are brought together, the areas where mining can be done in Turkey have been narrowed to a great extent. It is an erroneous approach to suggest that mining is superior to olive cultivation and vice versa compared to mining and olive cultivation. Olive and mining are two different economic activities that must be maintained for the country's economy. For sustainable development, these activities need to be continued without hindering each other. It is expected for necessary regulations to be made in the Turkish mining legislation by taking the applications of the countries, which have a coast to the Mediterranean and are developed in terms of olive industry, into account.

Özet

Maden işletme sahalarıyla tarım sahalarının çakışması sıkça yaşanabilmektedir. Tarım alanlarında madencilik konusunda en çok sorunlar zeytinlik alanlarda yaşanmaktadır. Maden alanları ile zeytin alanlarının çakışması halinde “Zeytinciliğin Islahı ve Yabanilerinin Aşılattırılması Hakkındaki Kanun” dikkate alınmaktadır. 1995 yılında bu Kanunun 20. maddesinin 1. fıkrasında yapılan değişiklik sonucunda, “Zeytinlik sahaları içinde ve bu sahalara en az 3 km mesafede zeytinyağı fabrikası hariç zeytinliklerin vegatatif ve generatif gelişmesine mani olacak kimyevi atık bırakan, toz ve duman çıkaran tesis yapılamaz ve işletilemez” hükmü öngörülmüştür. Ancak, uygulamada; gerçekleştirilecek madenciliğin zeytinliklerin vegatatif ve generatif gelişmesine engel olup olmayacağı incelenmeksizin, 3 km mesafe içerisinde madencilik faaliyetlerine izin verilmediği görülmektedir. Böylece, engellenmiş bu alanlar bir araya getirildiğinde Türkiye’de madencilik gerçekleştirilebilecek sahalar büyük ölçüde daralmıştır. Madencilikle zeytinciliği kıyaslayarak, madenciliğin zeytincilikten daha üstün olduğu ya da bunun aksini ileri sürmek yanlış bir yaklaşımdır. Zeytincilik ve madencilik ülkelerin ekonomisi için devam ettirilmesi mecburi iki farklı ekonomik faaliyettir. Sürdürülebilir kalkınma için bu faaliyetlerin birbirlerini engellemeden sürdürülmesi gerekmektedir. Dünyada Akdenize kıyısı bulunan zeytincilik sektöründe gelişmiş ülkelerin bu konudaki uygulamaları dikkate alınarak Türk maden mevzuatında gereken düzenlemelerin yapılması beklenmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, T. D., KURAL, O., ASLAN, Z. (2021). TO WHAT EXTENT IS IT POSSIBLE TO CONDUCT MINING ACTIVITIES IN AGRICULTURAL AREAS AND ESPECIALLY OLIVE GROVES: SOLUTION EXPECTATIONS OF ENTERPRISES. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1, 183–208. https://ajindex.com/articles/209898

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. AECOM, (2014). KOZA Gold Enterprises Inc. Kapıkaya Gold Silver Copper Mine Open Pit Mine Project Environmental Impact Assessment Application File, Bergama, Izmir, AECOM Turkey Consulting and Engineering Co. Ltd. 63 p. + Attachments. AGÜB, (2020). Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Meeting. Aggregate Bulletin, 17, 6-8.
  2. Anıl, M. (2015). Negative effect of olive act on mining operation. Mining Law Proceedings Book (3-4 October), Astana Publications, (pp. 423-445),
  3. Afyon, Turkey. Aydın, O. (2010) Journal foreword. Journal of Mining Turkey, 8, 5. Ayisi, M.K. (2017). The legal character of mineral rights under the new mining law of Kenya. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 35 (1), 25-46.
  4. Bastida, E. (2001). A review of the concept of security of mineral tenure: Issues and challenges. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 19 (1), 31-43.
  5. Bozkurt, T. (2018). Mining in the Ottoman Empire. Journal of Mining and Human, 2, 23-25.
  6. Cankurtaran, Y. (2008). Mandatory permits obtained in marble and natural stone sector by Mining Law. 1st National Congress of Marble and Natural Stones (1-2 February), 3-16.
  7. Çağatay, S.S., and Aliefendioğlu, Y. (2019). Land acquisition process in metal mining activities: Erzincan Province, İliç District, Çöpler Gold Mine. Social Sciences Research Journal, 8 (1), 223-241.
  8. Çanga, H.E. (2005). 5177 Annotated mining law and regulations. 1st edition, Country Mining Development Foundation (YMGV), 500 p. Çankaya, B. (2018). The right acquired in mining law. Turkey Miners Association (TMD) Sector News Bulletin, 69, 84-86.
  9. Çevik, M., and Bağcı, İ. (2019). Land is allocated by the state to those who want to farm. Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 244. Dinçer, A. (2018). İMİB came together with the miners of Bursa. (News from Turkey). Country Mining Development Foundation, Journal of Mining Sector, 66, 19. Efendioğlu, E. (2020). The problems of our mining and solution suggestions. Country Mining Development Foundation, Journal of Mining Sector, 76, 30. İMMİB, (2008). Turkey Mining Problems and Solutions. Istanbul Mineral Exporters' Association (İMMİB), Om Publishing, Istanbul, 63 p. Intarapravich, D., and Clark, A.L. (1994). Performance guarantee schemes in the minerals industry for sustainable development. Resources Policy, 20 (1), 59-69. Journal of Mining Turkey, (2011). Mining Law and Regulation Implementation Seminar (YMGV), Journal of Mining Turkey, 12, 24-25. Journal of Mining Turkey, (2012). After the Prime Ministry Circular. Jou