Journals / Erciyes Medical Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 1

Screening Results of Non-communicable Diseases in Adults and Elderly People Living in the Rural Area: A Cross-sectional Descriptive Study

Pages
98–104
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There is a need to promote encouraging practices for individuals living in rural areas aimed at prevention of NCDs, screening, and effective management of these diseases

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence, risk, and cancer screening results of the non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in the province of Antalya, Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The sample in this cross-sectional descriptive study included 441 volunteers (universe 3841) aged >40 years living in four rural areas in Antalya.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There is a need to promote encouraging practices for individuals living in rural areas aimed at prevention of NCDs, screening, and effective management of these diseases
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence, risk, and cancer screening results of the non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in the province of Antalya, Turkey. Materials and Methods: The sample in this cross-sectional descriptive study included 441 volunteers (universe 3841) aged >40 years living in four rural areas in Antalya. The questionnaire used in the study was divided into three parts: descriptive characteristics, Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISK), depression risk questionnaire, and cancer screening sections. Results: In total, 91.6% of the participants were aged ≥45 years, and at least one in 50.3% had a chronic disease. According to FINDRISK, 23.8% were in high, and 7.9% were in a very high risk group, 34.5% were slightly overweight, 56.2% were obese, and 26.7% had metabolic syndrome (MS). In total, 22.2% of the individuals were at a risk of depression. In cancer screenings, 32.1% of the women underwent mammography in the past 2 years, 33.6% underwent breast self-examination, and 60.3% underwent cervical cancer screening in the last 5 years. It was determined that 17.2% of participants underwent immunochemical fecal occult blood test. Conclusion: It was observed that approximately one-third of the participants are under risk in term of hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Compared with previous studies, screening rates have increased in recent years, but they are not at the desired level. There is a need to promote encouraging practices for individuals living in rural areas aimed at prevention of NCDs, screening, and effective management of these diseases

🔖

Cite This Article

TUZCU, A., MUSLU, L. (2020). Screening Results of Non-communicable Diseases in Adults and Elderly People Living in the Rural Area: A Cross-sectional Descriptive Study. Erciyes Medical Journal, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 1, 98–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/209743

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. World Health Organization. Noncommunicable diseases. Available from: URL: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases. Accessed January 11, 2019
  2. Ministry of Health.Turkey’ Health Statistical Yearbook 2017. Available from: URL: https://dosyasb.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/31096,turkcesiydijiv1pdf.pdf?0. Accesed May 14, 2018
  3. Erdem Y, Akpolat T, Derici Ü, Şengül Ş, Ertürk Ş, Ulusoy Ş, et al. Dietary Sources of High Sodium Intake in Turkey: SALTURK II. Nutrients 2017; 9(9): pii: E933
  4. WHO. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Globocan 2018, Turkey. Available from: URL: http://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/792-turkey-fact-sheets.pdf. Accessed April 16, 2019
  5. Daştan İ, Erem A, Çetinkaya V. Urban and rural differences in hypertension risk factors in Turkey. Anatol J Cardiol 2017; 18(1): 39–47
  6. Öztürk Haney M, Akdeniz Kudubeş A. Determination of Medication Use Habits of Adults Living in Rural Area. Turkish J Fam Med Prim Care 2017; 11(4): 213–20
  7. Das J, Mohpal A. Socioeconomic Status And Quality Of Care In Rural India: New Evidence From Provider And Household Surveys. Health Aff (Millwood) 2016; 35(10): 1764–73
  8. Xiao N, Long Q, Tang X, Tang S. A community-based approach to non-communicable chronic disease management within a context of advancing universal health coverage in China: progress and challenges. BMC Public Health 2014; 14(Suppl 2): S2
  9. Ilgaz AE, Gözüm S. Determination of Colorectal Cancer Risk Levels, Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates, and Factors Affecting Screening Participation of Individuals Working in Agriculture in Turkey. Cancer Nurs 2018; 41(4): E46–54
  10. Tuzcu A, Bahar Z, Gözüm S. Effects of Interventions Based on Health Behavior Models on Breast Cancer Screening Behaviors of Migrant Women in Turkey. Cancer Nurs 2016; 39(2): E40–50
  11. Subramanian S, Gakunga R, Kibachio J, Gathecha G, Edwards P, Ogola E, et al. Cost and affordability of non-communicable disease screening, diagnosis and treatment in Kenya: Patient payments in the private and public sectors. PLoS One 2018; 13(1): e0190113
  12. Jeet G, Thakur JS, Prinja S, Singh M. Community health workers for non-communicable diseases prevention and control in developing countries: Evidence and implications. PLoS One 2017; 12(7): e0180640
  13. Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C, Catapano AL, et al. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Fo