Journals / Erciyes Medical Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 1

The Prognostic Value of the GRACE Score for Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Complicated with Cardiogenic Shock

Pages
44–49
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on our data, we propose that the GRACE score is a simple and clinically applicable directive tool for rapid risk stratification of AKI in patients with STEMI complicated with CS

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score has been proposed in predicting short-term death in patients who are diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: We retrospectively examined a total of 492 consecutive patients with CS–STEMI who had undergone PPCI.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on our data, we propose that the GRACE score is a simple and clinically applicable directive tool for rapid risk stratification of AKI in patients with STEMI complicated with CS
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score has been proposed in predicting short-term death in patients who are diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome. The aim of the present study was to investigate the significance of the GRACE score for acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS)–ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively examined a total of 492 consecutive patients with CS–STEMI who had undergone PPCI. The GRACE score was calculated for each patient. Patients were stratified by tertiles (T1, T2, and T3) according to the GRACE score, and the incidence of AKI was compared between the groups. Results: In univariate analysis, the incidence of AKI was significantly higher for patients allocated into the T3 group than for patients in the T1 group (odds ratio (OR) 2.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8–4.1, p<0.001). Following including all confounding variables, participants in the T3 group had a 3.1-fold higher incidence of AKI (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.9–5.4, p<0.001). In a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the GRACE score of the area under the curve value for AKI was 0.70 (95% CI 0.65–0.74, p<0.001) with 69.2% sensitivity and 68.8% specificity. Conclusion: The GRACE score provides an independent prognostic marker of AKI in patients with CS related with STEMI. Based on our data, we propose that the GRACE score is a simple and clinically applicable directive tool for rapid risk stratification of AKI in patients with STEMI complicated with CS

🔖

Cite This Article

HAYIROĞLU, M. İ., ÇINAR, T., TEKKEŞİN, A. İ. (2020). The Prognostic Value of the GRACE Score for Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Complicated with Cardiogenic Shock. Erciyes Medical Journal, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 1, 44–49. https://ajindex.com/articles/209740

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Hoste EA, Kellum JA. Acute kidney injury: epidemiology and diagnostic criteria. Curr Opin Crit Care 2006; 12(6): 531–7
  2. Roman-Pognuz E, Elmer J, Rittenberger JC, Guyette FX, Berlot G, De Rosa S, et al. Markers of cardiogenic shock predict persistent acute kidney injury after out of hospital cardiac arrest. Heart Lung 2019; 48(2): 126–30
  3. Marenzi G, Assanelli E, Campodonico J, De Metrio M, Lauri G, Marana I, et al. Acute kidney injury in ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock at admission. Crit Care Med 2010; 38(2): 438–44
  4. Hayıroğlu Mİ, Çanga Y, Yıldırımtürk Ö, Bozbeyoğlu E, Gümüşdağ A, Uzun AO, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome patients with intra-aortic balloon pump inserted in intensive cardiac care unit of a tertiary clinic. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2018; 46(1): 10–7
  5. Elapavaluru S, Kellum JA. Why do patients die of acute kidney injury? Acta Clin Belg 2007; 62 Suppl 2: 326–31
  6. Kelly KJ. Distant effects of experimental renal ischemia/reperfusion injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14(6): 1549–58
  7. Chou YH, Huang TM, Wu VC, Wang CY, Shiao CC, Lai CF, et al. Impact of timing of renal replacement therapy initiation on outcome of septic acute kidney injury. Crit Care 2011; 15(3): R134
  8. Marenzi G, Marana I, Lauri G, Assanelli E, Grazi M, Campodonico J, et al. The prevention of radiocontrast-agent-induced nephropathy by hemofiltration. N Engl J Med 2003; 349(14): 1333–40
  9. Fox KA, Dabbous OH, Goldberg RJ, Pieper KS, Eagle KA, Van de Werf F, et al. Prediction of risk of death and myocardial infarction in the six months after presentation with acute coronary syndrome: prospective multinational observational study (GRACE). BMJ 2006; 333(7578): 1091
  10. Elbarouni B, Goodman SG, Yan RT, Welsh RC, Kornder JM, Dey- oung JP, et al; Canadian Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE/GRACE(2)) Investigators. Validation of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Event (GRACE) risk score for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome in Canada. Am Heart J 2009; 158(3): 392–9
  11. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD; Writing Group on the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2012; 33(20): 2551–67
  12. McMurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, Auricchio A, Böhm M, Dickstein K, et al; ESC Committee for Practice