Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2015 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 5

Angiographic analysis of the lateral intercostal artery perforator of the posterior intercostal artery: anatomic variation and clinical significance

Pages
415–418
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Awareness of the anatomical variations of the LICAPs of the PICA will allow surgeons and interventional radiologists to avoid iatrogenic arterial injuries during posterior transthoracic procedures and surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE Knowledge of the anatomic variations of the posterior intercostal artery (PICA) and its major branch-es is important during transthoracic procedures and surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We aimed to identify the anatomic fea-tures and variations of the lateral intercostal artery perforator (LICAP) of the PICA with selective PICA arteriography.METHODSWe retrospectively evaluated 353 PICAs in 75 patients with selective PICA arteriography for the following characteristics: incidence, length (as number of traversed intercostal spaces), distribution at the hemithorax (medial half vs. lateral half ), and size as compared to the collateral intercostal artery of the PICA.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Awareness of the anatomical variations of the LICAPs of the PICA will allow surgeons and interventional radiologists to avoid iatrogenic arterial injuries during posterior transthoracic procedures and surgery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

PURPOSE Knowledge of the anatomic variations of the posterior intercostal artery (PICA) and its major branch-es is important during transthoracic procedures and surgery. We aimed to identify the anatomic fea-tures and variations of the lateral intercostal artery perforator (LICAP) of the PICA with selective PICA arteriography.METHODSWe retrospectively evaluated 353 PICAs in 75 patients with selective PICA arteriography for the following characteristics: incidence, length (as number of traversed intercostal spaces), distribution at the hemithorax (medial half vs. lateral half ), and size as compared to the collateral intercostal artery of the PICA. RESULTSThe incidence of LICAPs was 35.9% (127/353). LICAPs were most commonly observed in the right 8th-11th intercostal spaces (33%, 42/127) and in the medial half of the hemithorax (85%, 108/127). Most LICAPs were as long as two (35.4%, 45/127) or three intercostal spaces (60.6%, 77/127). Com-pared to the collateral intercostal artery, 42.5% of LICAPs were larger (54/127), with most of these observed in the right 4th-7th intercostal spaces (48.8%, 22/54).CONCLUSIONWe propose the clinical significance of the LICAP as a potential risk factor for iatrogenic injury during posterior transthoracic intervention and thoracic surgery. For example, skin incisions must be as superficial as possible and directed vertically at the right 4th-7th intercostal spaces and the medial half of the thorax. Awareness of the anatomical variations of the LICAPs of the PICA will allow surgeons and interventional radiologists to avoid iatrogenic arterial injuries during posterior transthoracic procedures and surgery.

🔖

Cite This Article

JEON, E. Y., CHO, Y. K., YOON, D. Y., SEO, Y. L., LİM, K. J., YUN, E. J. (2015). Angiographic analysis of the lateral intercostal artery perforator of the posterior intercostal artery: anatomic variation and clinical significance. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 5, 415–418. https://ajindex.com/articles/209728

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Bluebond-Langner R, Pinto PA, Kim FJ, Hsu T, Jarrett TW. Recurrent bleeding from intercostal arterial pseudoaneurysm after retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. Urology 2002
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Töpel I, Steinbauer M, Paetzel C, Kasprzak PM. Endovascular therapy of a ruptured intercos-tal artery aneurysm. J Endovasc Ther 2004
  3. [CrossRef 3. Sekino S, Takagi H, Kubota H, Kato T, Matsuno Y, Umemoto T. Intercostal artery pseudoan-eurysm due to stab wound. J Vasc Surg 2005
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Choi S, Trieu J, Ridley L. Radiological review of intercostal artery: Anatomical considerations when performing procedures via intercos-tal space. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2010
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Dewhurst C, O'Neill S, O'Regan K, Maher M. Demonstration of the course of the posterior intercostal artery on CT angiography: relevance to interventional radiology procedures in the chest. Diagn Interv Radiol 2012
  6. Da Rocha RP, Vengjer A, Blanco A, de Carvalho PT, Mongon ML, Fernandes GJ. Size of the col-lateral intercostal artery in adults: anatomical considerations in relation to thoracocentesis and thoracoscopy. Surg Radiol Anat 2002
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Wraight WM, Tweedie DJ, Parkin IG. Neurovas-cular anatomy and variation in the fourth, fifth and sixth intercostal spaces in the midclavic-ular line: a cadaveric study in respect of chest drain insertion. Clin Anat 2005
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Prasad V, Almutairi K, Kimble FW, Stewart F, Morris SF. Dorsolateral musculocutaneous perforators of posterior intercostal artery: an anatomical study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Offman SL, Geddes CR, Tang M, Morris SF. The vascular basis of perforator flaps based on the source arteries of the lateral lumbar region. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Boucher F, Pinatel B, Shipkov H, et al. Anatom-ical study of muscular latissimus dorsi surface vascularized by the transverse branch of tho-raco-dorsal artery. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2014
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Minabe T, Harii K. Dorsal intercostal artery per-forator flap: anatomical study and clinical ap-plications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Shimizu S, Tanaka R, Kan S, Suzuki S, Kurata A, Fujii K. Origins of the segmental arteries in the aorta: an anatomic study for selective catheter-ization with spinal arteriography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005
  13. Bae JI, Park AW, Lee SJ