SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Haseki Tıp Bülteni / 2016 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 3

Robotic Surgery: Technological Developments and the Position in Urological Surgery

Robotik Cerrahi: Teknolojik Gelişmeler ve Ürolojik Cerrahideki Yeri

Akif ERBİN
Faruk ÖZGÖR
Murat BİNBAY
Pages
127–132
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the future, if the cost problem is resolved, robotic surgery will be the gold standard of treatment for the operations, such as partial nephrectomy, pyeloplasty, radical prostatectomy and radical cystectomy, which require more complex reconstruction

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, we discuss the place of robotic surgery in urology in the light of the current technological developments.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within the past 15 years, unprecedented advances have been experienced in robotic surgery.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the future, if the cost problem is resolved, robotic surgery will be the gold standard of treatment for the operations, such as partial nephrectomy, pyeloplasty, radical prostatectomy and radical cystectomy, which require more complex reconstruction
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, we discuss the place of robotic surgery in urology in the light of the current technological developments. Within the past 15 years, unprecedented advances have been experienced in robotic surgery. Urology has been played an active role in these developments. Owing to innovations of robotic surgery, some technical limitations of conventional laparoscopy have been overcome. Especially, some technical limitations of conventional laparoscopic surgery requiring reconstruction and operational challenges have significantly been solved. Despite these superior advantages, high cost of the method is the most important disadvantage. In the literature, the cost-effectiveness is the main point of discussions about robotic surgery. In the future, if the cost problem is resolved, robotic surgery will be the gold standard of treatment for the operations, such as partial nephrectomy, pyeloplasty, radical prostatectomy and radical cystectomy, which require more complex reconstruction

Özet

Çalışmamızda güncel teknolojik gelişmeler ile birlikte robotik cerrahinin üroloji alanındaki yeri tartışılmıştır. Son 15 yılda robotik cerrahi ile ilgili baş döndürücü gelişmeler yaşanmıştır. Bu gelişmelerde ürolojik cerrahi ön sıralarda yer almıştır. Üroloji pratiğinde, robotik cerrahinin getirmiş olduğu yenilikler sayesinde konvansiyonel laparoskopideki bazı teknik kısıtlılıkların üstesinden gelinmiştir. Özellikle konvansiyonel laparoskopinin rekonstriksiyon gerektiren cerrahilerdeki teknik kısıtlılığı ve operasyon zorluğu robotik cerrahi ile anlamlı derecede çözüme kavuşmuştur. Bu üstün avantajlarına karşın yüksek maliyet yöntemin en önemli dezavantajı olarak durmaktadır. Literatürde, robotik cerrahi ile ilgili tartışmaların odaklandığı temel nokta maliyettir. Gelecekte maliyet problemi ortadan kalkarsa robotik cerrahi özellikle parsiyel nefrektomi, piyeloplasti, radikal prostatektomi ve radikal sistektomi gibi daha fazla rekonstriksiyon gerektiren cerrahiler için altın standart yöntem olacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERBİN, A., ÖZGÖR, F., BİNBAY, M. (2016). Robotic Surgery: Technological Developments and the Position in Urological Surgery. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 3, 127–132. https://ajindex.com/articles/209710

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Kaye DR, Mullins JK, Carter HB, et al. Robotic surgery in urological oncology: patient care or market share? Nat Rev Urol 2015;12:55-60.
  2. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, et al. Transatlantic robot- assisted telesurgery. Nature 2001;413:379-80.
  3. Yang DY, Monn MF, Bahler CD, et al. Does robotic assistance confer an economic benefit during laparoscopic radical nephrectomy? J Urol 2014;192:671-6.
  4. Yu HY, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, et al. Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery. J Urol 2012;187:1392-8. Lotan Y. Is robotic surgery cost-effective: no. Curr Opin Urol 2012;22:66-9.
  5. Delto JC, Wayne G, Yanes R, et al. Reducing robotic prostatectomy costs by minimizing instrumentation. J Endourol 2015;29:556-60.
  6. R. P, Roan, S. A, et al. An Instrumented Minimally Invasive Surgical Tool: Design and Calibration. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics 2011;8:173-90.
  7. Eljamel S, Petersen M, Valentine R, et al. Comparison of intraoperative fluorescence and MRI image guided neuronavigation in malignant brain tumours, a prospective controlled study. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2013;10:356- 61. Kaouk JH, Goel RK, Haber GP, et al. Robotic single-port transumbilical surgery in humans: initial report. BJU Int 2009;103:366-9.
  8. Kaouk JH, Autorino R, Kim FJ, et al. Laparoendoscopic single- site surgery in urology: worldwide multi-institutional analysis of 1076 cases. Eur Urol 2011;60:998-1005.
  9. Samarasekera D, Kaouk JH. Robotic single port surgery: Current status and future considerations. Indian J Urol 2014;30:326-32.
  10. Ding J, Goldman RE, Xu K, et al. Design and Coordination Kinematics of an Insertable Robotic Effectors Platform for Single-Port Access Surgery. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron 2013:1612-24.
  11. Simaan N, Bajo A, Reiter A, et al. Lessons learned using the insertable robotic effector platform (IREP) for single port access surgery. J Robot Surg 2013;7:235-40.
  12. Morgan M, Olweny EO, Cadeddu JA. LESS and NOTES instrumentation: future. Curr Opin Urol 2014;24:58-65.
  13. Laydner H, Autorino R, Isac W, et al. Robotic retroperitoneal transvaginal natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) nephrectomy: feasibility study in a cadaver model. Urology 2013;81:1232-7.
  14. Eyraud R, Laydner H, Autorino R, et al. Robot-assisted transrectal hybrid natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery nephrectomy and adrenalectomy: initial investigation in a cadaver model. Urology 2013;81:1090-4.
  15. Kaouk JH, Khalifeh A, Laydner H, et al. Transvaginal hy