Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2015 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1

Salivary glucose and antioxidant defense markers in type II diabetes mellitus

Pages
141–147
Publication Date
2015-03-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Findings of this study, showing a strong correlation between salivary glucose and blood glucose as well as changes in antioxidant components in the DM group, suggest that saliva can be used for the diagnosis and management of DM.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:To evaluate salivary antioxidant defense markers, their correlation with salivary glucose, and glycemic status in type II diabetes mellitus (DM).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: The study included 53 diabetic patients and 40 healthy subjects.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Findings of this study, showing a strong correlation between salivary glucose and blood glucose as well as changes in antioxidant components in the DM group, suggest that saliva can be used for the diagnosis and management of DM.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Antioxidant activity · catalase · diabetes mellitus

Abstract

To evaluate salivary antioxidant defense markers, their correlation with salivary glucose, and glycemic status in type II diabetes mellitus (DM). Materials and methods: The study included 53 diabetic patients and 40 healthy subjects. Salivary glucose, blood glucose, and uric acid (UA) were determined by specific enzymatic methods. Total antioxidant activity (AOA), glutathione (GSH), catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and total protein were determined spectrophotometrically. Results: Salivary UA (3.12 vs. 1.89 mg/dL), GSH (47 vs. 11.92 µg/mL), and total protein (375.12 vs. 202.23 mg/dL) were significantly higher (P < 0.001; r = 0.455, 0.735, 0.498 respectively) and AOA (653.1 vs. 897.3 µmol/L) was significantly lower in the DM group (P < 0.001, r = -0.431) compared to healthy controls. Among the antioxidant enzymes, CAT was significantly lower (1214 vs. 9468.9 kat) in the DM group (P < 0.001, r = -0.886). Spearman correlation analyses within the diabetic group showed a strong positive association between salivary glucose and blood glucose (P < 0.001, r = 0.9), salivary glucose and GSH, and salivary glucose and UA. Salivary glucose showed a negative correlation with AOA and CAT (P = 0.008, r = -0.447) in the diabetic group. Conclusion: Findings of this study, showing a strong correlation between salivary glucose and blood glucose as well as changes in antioxidant components in the DM group, suggest that saliva can be used for the diagnosis and management of DM.

Özet

To evaluate salivary antioxidant defense markers, their correlation with salivary glucose, and glycemic status in type II diabetes mellitus (DM). Materials and methods: The study included 53 diabetic patients and 40 healthy subjects. Salivary glucose, blood glucose, and uric acid (UA) were determined by specific enzymatic methods. Total antioxidant activity (AOA), glutathione (GSH), catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and total protein were determined spectrophotometrically. Results: Salivary UA (3.12 vs. 1.89 mg/dL), GSH (47 vs. 11.92 µg/mL), and total protein (375.12 vs. 202.23 mg/dL) were significantly higher (P < 0.001; r = 0.455, 0.735, 0.498 respectively) and AOA (653.1 vs. 897.3 µmol/L) was significantly lower in the DM group (P < 0.001, r = -0.431) compared to healthy controls. Among the antioxidant enzymes, CAT was significantly lower (1214 vs. 9468.9 kat) in the DM group (P < 0.001, r = -0.886). Spearman correlation analyses within the diabetic group showed a strong positive association between salivary glucose and blood glucose (P < 0.001, r = 0.9), salivary glucose and GSH, and salivary glucose and UA. Salivary glucose showed a negative correlation with AOA and CAT (P = 0.008, r = -0.447) in the diabetic group. Conclusion: Findings of this study, showing a strong correlation between salivary glucose and blood glucose as well as changes in antioxidant components in the DM group, suggest that saliva can be used for the diagnosis and management of DM.

🔖

Cite This Article

MUSSAVIRA, S., DHARMALINGAM, M., SUKUMARAN, B. O. (2015). Salivary glucose and antioxidant defense markers in type II diabetes mellitus. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1, 141–147. https://ajindex.com/articles/209659

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Scully T. Diabetes in numbers. Nature 2012; 485: S2–S3. Ben-Aryeh H, Serouya R, Kanter Y, Szargel R, Laufer D. Salivary composition in diabetic patients. J Diabetes Complicat 1988; 2: 96–99. 3. Pfaffe T, Cooper-White J, Kostner K, Punyadeera C. Diagnostic potential of saliva: current state and future applications. Clin Chem 2011; 57: 675–687. Mealey B. Diabetes mellitus. In: Greenberg MS, Glick M, editors. Burket’s Oral Medicine. 10th ed. Hamilton, ON, Canada: BC Decker Inc.; 2003. pp. 5–33.
  2. Cao G, Prior RL. Comparison of different analytical methods for assessing total antioxidant capacity of human serum. Clin Chem 1998; 44: 1309–1315. 9. Koracevic D, Koracevic G, Djordjevic V, Andrejevic S, Cosic V. Method for the measurement of antioxidant activity in human fluids. J Clin Pathol 2001; 54: 356–361.
  3. Pisoschi AM, Negulescu GP. Methods for total antioxidant activity determination: a review. Biochemistry & Analytical Biochemistry 2011; 1: 1000106. Panchbhai AS, Degwekar, Shirish S, Bhowte RR. Estimation of salivary glucose amylase and salivary flow rate in diabetes in India. J Oral Sci 2010; 52: 359–368. Aydin S. A comparison of ghrelin, glucose, alpha-amylase and protein levels in saliva from diabetics. J Biochem Mol Biol 2007; 40: 29–35.
  4. Scott DA, Renaud DE, Krishnasamy S, Meriç P, Buduneli N, Çetinkalp Ş, Liu KZ. Diabetes-related molecular signatures in infrared spectra of human saliva. Diabetol Metab Syndr 2010; 2: 1–9. Sinha KA. Colorimetric assay of catalase. Anal Biochem 1972; 47: 389–394.
  5. Kakkar P, Das B, Vishwanathan PN. A modified spectrophotometric assay of superoxide dismutase. Indian J Biochem Bio 1984; 21: 130–132.
  6. Khan H, Jan SU, Hasmatullah, Khan FM, Khan AM, Rehman AUR, Abdul W. Effect of lithium metal on the chemical status of glutathione (GSH) present in whole blood (especially in plasma and cytosolic fraction in human blood). Pak J Pharm Sci 2010; 23: 188–193. Al-Rawi HN. Oxidative stress, antioxidant status and lipid profile in the saliva of type 2 diabetics. Diab Vasc Dis Res 2011; 8: 22–28.
  7. Hegde A, Shenoy R, D’Mello P, A Smitha, Tintu A, Manjrekar P. Alternative markers of glycemic status in diabetes mellitus. Biomed Res 2010; 21: 7–9.
  8. Carda C, Mosquera-Lloreda N, Salom L, Gomez de Ferraris ME, Peydró A. Structural and functional salivary disorders in type 2 diabetic patients. Med Oral Patol Oral 2006; 11: E309– E314. Jurysta C, Bulur N, Oguzhan B, Satman I, Yilmaz TM, Malaisse WJ, Sener A. Salivary glucose concentration and excretion