SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of Dental Models Created by Using A Low-Cost, Three-Dimensional Printer

DÜŞÜK MALİYETLİ, ÜÇ BOYUTLU BİR YAZICI KULLANILARAK OLUŞTURULAN DİŞ MODELLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Ali Can BULUT
Pages
461–469
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the teeth produced with inexpensive 3D printers are suitable for preclinical education.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Nowadays, with the rapid advancement of technology, the rapid integration of innovations into education is provided.
📊
Key Findings & Data:One of these innovations is three-dimensional (3D) printers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the teeth produced with inexpensive 3D printers are suitable for preclinical education.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Diş hekimliği eğitimi · Diş modelleri · Üç boyutlu yazıcılar

Abstract

Objective: Nowadays, with the rapid advancement of technology, the rapid integration of innovations into education is provided. One of these innovations is three-dimensional (3D) printers. Realistic anatomical tooth models are needed in preclinical dental training. However, due to the cost of dental models, the models provided for dental education are usually insufficient in number. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the teeth produced with inexpensive 3D printers are suitable for preclinical education.

Özet

Amaç: Günümüzde teknolojinin hızlı ilerlemesi ile yeniliklerin eğitime hızlı bir entegrasyonu olmaktadır. Bu yeniliklerden bir tanesi de üç boyutlu (3B) yazıcılardır. Diş hekimliği preklinik eğitiminde gerçekçi anatomik diş modellerine ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Fakat diş modellerinin maliyetli olması sebebi ile yeterli sayıda diş modelleri diş hekimliği eğitiminde yerini alamamaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı ucuz 3B yazıcı ile üretilen dişlerin preklinik eğitimi için uygun olup olmadığının değerlendirmektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BULUT, A. C. (2020). Evaluation of Dental Models Created by Using A Low-Cost, Three-Dimensional Printer. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3, 461–469. https://ajindex.com/articles/209459

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akaltan K. Diş hekimliği eğitiminde güncelleme: eğitim ve öğrenim yöntemleri. Selcuk Dental Journal.2019;6(5):1-20. Doi:10.15311/selcukdentj.552022
  2. Abdelkarim A, Benghuzzi H, Hamadain E, Tucci M, Ford T, Sullivan D. US dental students’ and faculty members’ attitudes about technology, instructional strategies, student diversity, and school duration: a comparative study. J DentEduc. 2014;78(4):614‐21
  3. Gadbury CC, Purk JH, Williams BJ, Van Ness CJ. Using tablet technology and instructional videos to enhance preclinical dental laboratory learning. J DentEduc. 2014;78(2):250‐58
  4. Khatoon B, Hill KB, Walmsley AD. Instant messaging in dental education. J DentEduc. 2015;79(12):1471‐78
  5. Demir EBK, Çaka C, Tuğtekin U, Demir K, İslamoğlu H, Kuzu A. Üç boyutlu yazdırma teknolojilerinin eğitim alanında kullanımı: Türkiye’deki Uygulamalar. Ege Eğitim Dergisi. 2016;2(17):481-7
  6. Javaid M, Haleem A, Kumar L. Current status and applications of 3D scanning in dentistry. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 2019;7(2):228-33. Doi:10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.04.004
  7. Berman B. 3-D printing: The new industrial revolution. Business Horizons. 2012;55(2):155-162. Doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2011.11.003
  8. Yalçın B, Ergene B. Endüstride yeni eğilim olan 3B eklemeli imalat yöntemi ve metalurjisi. SDÜ International Journal of Technological Science. 2017;9(3):65-88
  9. Zhang YS, Yue K, Aleman J, Moghaddam KM, Bakht SM, Yang J ve ark. 3D Bioprinting for tissueand organ fabrication. AnnBiomedEng. 2017;45(1):148-63. Doi:10.1007/s10439-016-1612-8
  10. Oberoi G, Nitsch S, Edelmayer M, Janjić K, Müller AS, Agis H. 3D Printing-encompassing the facets of dentistry. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018;22(6):172-185. Doi:10.3389/fbioe.2018.00172
  11. Hung KC, Tseng CS, Dai LG, Hsu SH. Water-based polyurethane 3D printed scaffolds with controlled release function forcus to mized cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2016;83(11):156-68. Doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.019
  12. Elbashti M, Hattori M, Sumita Y, Aswehlee A, Yoshi S, Taniguchi H. Creating a digitizeddatabase of maxillofacialprostheses (obturators): A pilot study. J AdvProsthodont. 2016;8(3):219-23. Doi:10.4047/jap.2016.8.3.219
  13. Chen H, Yang X, Chen L, Wang Y, Sun Y. Application of FDM three-dimensional printing technology in the digital manufacture of custom edentulous mandibletrays. SciRep. 2016;14(6);1-6. Doi:10.1038/srep19207
  14. Liu L, Zhou R, Yuan S, Sun Z, Lu X, Li J et al. Training for ceramic crown preparati