Journals / Alatarım / 2020 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

The Effect of Rootstocks on Fruit Quality of Watermelon

Anaçların Karpuzun Meyve Kalitesi Üzerindeki Etkisi

Journal
Alatarım
Pages
116–133
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The review was concluded by stating possible studies aimed at increasing the product quality of watermelon and clarifying the effects of rootstock/scion combinations on product quality.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In fruit-bearing vegetables, the use of rootstocks against adverse environmental conditions and soil-borne diseases and pests is becoming common practice.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Grafting has significant effects on the fruit quality of watermelon which is one of the most grafted vegetables.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The review was concluded by stating possible studies aimed at increasing the product quality of watermelon and clarifying the effects of rootstock/scion combinations on product quality.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In fruit-bearing vegetables, the use of rootstocks against adverse environmental conditions and soil-borne diseases and pests is becoming common practice. Grafting has significant effects on the fruit quality of watermelon which is one of the most grafted vegetables. The physical properties of watermelon such as fruit size, rind thickness, flesh color, flesh firmness and chemical properties such as TSSC, sugar composition, aroma compounds, antioxidative compounds and mineral content can be affected by rootstocks. There are many conflicting reports about the effect of grafting on fruit quality in watermelon. These differences are attributed to rootstock/scion combinations, cultivation methods, environmental conditions, cultivation period and harvest timing. In this review, the effects of grafting on the physical and chemical quality criteria of watermelon are evaluated according to latest available literature. The review was concluded by stating possible studies aimed at increasing the product quality of watermelon and clarifying the effects of rootstock/scion combinations on product quality.

Özet

Meyvesi yenen sebzelerde, olumsuz çevre koşulları ve toprak kökenli hastalık ve zararlılara karşı anaç kullanımı yaygın bir uygulama haline gelmektedir. En fazla aşılanan türlerden birisi olan karpuzun meyve kalitesi üzerinde aşılamanın önemli etkileri vardır. Karpuzun meyve büyüklüğü, kabuk kalınlığı, meyve eti rengi, meyve eti sertliği gibi fiziksel özellikleri ve SÇKM, şeker kompozisyonu, aroma bileşikleri, antioksidatif bileşikler ve mineral içeriği gibi kimyasal özellikler anaçlardan etkilenebilmektedir. Karpuzda aşılı üretimin meyve kalitesi üzerine etkisi ile ilgili birçok çelişkili rapor vardır. Bu farklılıklar, kullanılan anaç/kalem kombinasyonlarına, yetiştiricilik yöntemlerine, çevresel koşullara, yetiştiricilik dönemine ve hasat zamanlamasına bağlanmıştır. Bu derlemede, aşılamanın karpuzun fiziksel ve kimyasal kalite kriterleri üzerine olan etkileri son literatürler ışığında incelenmiştir. Derleme, karpuzun ürün kalitesi arttırmayı ve anaç/kalem kombinasyonlarının ürün kalitesine olan etkilerinin aydınlatılmasını amaçlayan olası çalışmaları belirterek sonuçlandırılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YETİŞİR, H. (2020). The Effect of Rootstocks on Fruit Quality of Watermelon. Alatarım, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 116–133. https://ajindex.com/articles/209433

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Aguiló-Aguayo, I., Montero-Calderon, M., Soliva-Fortuny, R., Martin-Belloso, O., 2010. Changes in flavour compounds throughout cold storage of watermelon juice processed by high-intensity pulsed electric fields of heat. Journal of Food Engineering, 100: 43-49.
  2. Alan, O., Sen, F., Duzyaman, E., 2018. The effectiveness of growth cycle on improving fruit quality for grafted watermelon combinations. Food Sci Technol Campinas, 38 (Sppl. 1): 270-277.
  3. Albacete, A., Martinez-Anddujar, C., MartinezPerez, A., Thompson, A.J., Dodd, I.C., Perez- Alfocea, F., 2015. Unravelling rootstock/scion interactions to improve food security. J Exp Bot, 66: 2211- 2226. Alexopoulos, A., Kondylis, A., Passam, H., 2007. Fruit yield and quality of watermelon in relation to grafting. J Food Agric Environ, 5: 178-179.
  4. Ashita, E., 1930. Grafting methods of watermelons (in Japanese’. Korea (Chosum) Agricultural Newsletter 4, 50. Aslam, A., Zhao, S., Azam, M., Lu, X., He, N., Li, B., Dou, J., Zhu, H., Liu, W., 2020. Comparative analysis of primary metabolites and transcriptome changes between ungrafted and pumpkin-grafted watermelon during fruit development. PeerJ, 8: 8259 Bangalore, D.V., McGlynn, W.G., Scott, D.D., 2008. Effects of fruit maturity on watermelon ultrastructure and intracellular lycopene distribution. J Food Sci., 73: 222-228.
  5. Bantis, F., Koukounaras, A., Siomos, A., Menexes, G., Dangitsis, C., Kintzonidis, D., 2019. Assessing quantitative criteria for characterization of quality categories for grafted watermelon seedlings. Horticulturae, 5: 16. Beaulieu, J.C., Lea, J.M., 2006. Characterization and semiquantitative analysis of volatiles in seedless watermelon varieties using solid-phase microextraction. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 54: 7789-7793.
  6. Bekhradi, F., Kashi, A., Delshad, M., 2011. Effect of three cucurbit rootstocks on vegetative and yield of ‘Charleston Grey’ watermelon. Int J Plant Prod., 5: 105–109.
  7. Bertucci, M.B., Jennings, K.M., Monks, D.W., Schultheis, J.R., Perkin-Veazie, P., Louws, F.J., Jordan, D.L., 2018. Early growth, yield, and fruit quality of standard and mini watermelon grafted onto several commercial available cucurbit rootstocks. HortTechnology, 28: 459-469
  8. Bie, Z.L., Nawaz, M.A., Huang, Y., Lee, J.M., Colla, G., 2017. Introduction to vegetable grafting. (Vegetable grafting: Principles and Practices, CABI UK: Ed by Colla G, Perez Alfocea F and Schwarz D) 1-21.
  9. Bigdelo, M., Hassandokht, M.R., Rouphael, Y., Colla, G., Soltani, F., Sale