Journals / Kebikeç İnsan Bilimleri İçin Kaynak Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2012 / Sayı: 33

Bandits at Ottoman-Safavid frontier in the second half of the 16th century: An analysis

16. Yüzyılın ikinci yarısında Osmanlı-Safevi Sınırında Eşkıyalar: Bir çözümleme denemesi

Pages
35–48
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Even if in this short article, emphasis is put on the forms of actions realized by the bandits and semi-autonomous recognized political actors of the Ottoman-Safavid frontier in the second half of the 16th century, this, on the other hand, should not conceal the presence of homologous patterns -hence their relationality- observable in other marginal configurations of the Ottoman Empire as well as in contemporaneous frontier zones elsewhere.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The analysis of bandits as a social formation in the pre-modern times, particularly their variants in the peripheral areas, is not only useful for the study of their socio-political structure in general, but also necessary for the understanding of the political realm in which they operate.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The analysis of bandits as a social formation in the pre-modern times, particularly their variants in the peripheral areas, is not only useful for the study of their socio-political structure in general, but also necessary for the understanding of the political realm in which they operate.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Even if in this short article, emphasis is put on the forms of actions realized by the bandits and semi-autonomous recognized political actors of the Ottoman-Safavid frontier in the second half of the 16th century, this, on the other hand, should not conceal the presence of homologous patterns -hence their relationality- observable in other marginal configurations of the Ottoman Empire as well as in contemporaneous frontier zones elsewhere.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The analysis of bandits as a social formation in the pre-modern times, particularly their variants in the peripheral areas, is not only useful for the study of their socio-political structure in general, but also necessary for the understanding of the political realm in which they operate. Even if in this short article, emphasis is put on the forms of actions realized by the bandits and semi-autonomous recognized political actors of the Ottoman-Safavid frontier in the second half of the 16th century, this, on the other hand, should not conceal the presence of homologous patterns -hence their relationality- observable in other marginal configurations of the Ottoman Empire as well as in contemporaneous frontier zones elsewhere.

Özet

Yeni Çağ’’ın başlarında eşkıyalığın aldığı biçimlerin incelenmesi, bu oluşumların siyasitoplumsal yapılarının tarihsel-çözümlemesi için yararlı olacağı gibi, içlerinde bulunduğu siyasi uzamın doğasını kavramak içinde gereklidir. Her ne kadar, bu yazıda, 16. yüzyılın ikinci yarısında Osmanlı-Safevi sınırındaki eşkıyalar ve bunlarla bağlantılı olan yerel yarı-bağımsız siyasi eyleyiciler üzerinde durulduysa da, bunların işleyiş kipleri, Osmanlı siyasi uzamının çeperindeki ve diğer devletlerin sınır bölgelerinde bunların çağdaşı olan oluşumlarla benzeriklikleri ve ilintileri açığa çıkarılarak kurgulandı.

🔖

Cite This Article

IŞIKSEL, G. (2012). Bandits at Ottoman-Safavid frontier in the second half of the 16th century: An analysis. Kebikeç İnsan Bilimleri İçin Kaynak Araştırmaları Dergisi, Sayı: 33, 35–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/209142

References (20)

  1. Arşiv Kaynakları BOA, Mühimme Defteri, VI, n° 159 BOA, Mühimme Defteri VII, n° 457, 2292 BOA, Mühimme Defteri XXVI, n° 298, 677 BOA, Mühimme Defteri XXVII n° 232 BOA, Mühimme Defteri XXXII, n° 657 BOA, Mühimme Defteri XXXV, n° 367 Akdağ, Mustafa. Türk Halkının Dirlik ve Düzenlik Kavgası: Celâlî isyanları. İstanbul: 2009
  2. Altaylı, Yasemin. ““Macarca Mektuplarıyla Budin Beylerbeyi Sokollu Mustafa Paşa”” Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi 49, 2 (2009): 157-171
  3. Ardalan, Sheerin. Les Kurdes Ardalân entre la Perse et l’’Empire otoman. Paris: 2004.
  4. Aydın, Dündar. Erzurum Beylerbeyliği ve Teşkilatı, Kuruluş ve Genişleme Devri (1535-1566). Ankara: 1998.
  5. Aydın, Suavi ve Oktay Özel. ““Power Relations Between State and Tribes in Ottoman Eastern Anatolia”” Bulgarian Historical Review 3-4 (2006): 51-67.
  6. Bayatlı, Nilufer. XVI. Yüzyılda Musul Eyaleti. Ankara: 1999
  7. Bayerle, Gustav. Ottoman Diplomacy in Hungary. Letters from the Pashas of Buda 1590-1593. Bloomington: 1972
  8. Berindei, Mihnea. ““Le problème des ‘‘Cosaques’’ dans la seconde moitié du XVIe siècle”” Cahiers du monde russe et soviétique XIII 3 (1973): 338-367.
  9. Boucharlat, Rémy, Curtis Sarkhosh, Vesta Sarah Stewart (der.). Birth of the Persian Empire. Londra: 2007.
  10. Bracewell, Catherine. XVI. Yüzyılda Adriyatik’’te Korsanlık ve Eşkıyalık: Senjli Uskoklar. İstanbul: 2009.
  11. Capdetrey, Laurent. Le pouvoir séleucide. Territoire, administration, finances d’’un royaume hellénistique (312-129 avant J.C.). Rennes: 2007.
  12. Dignas, Beate ve Engelbert Winter. Rome and Persia in Late Antiquity: Neighbors and Rivals. Cambridge: 2007.
  13. Emecen, Feridun. Osmanlı Klasik Çağında Siyaset İstanbul: Timaş, 2009.
  14. Esin, Zafer. Klasik Dönem Osmanlı Devleti’’nde Van Gölü Havzasındaki Ayaklanma ve Eşkıyalık Hareketleri. Basılmamış master tezi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, 2007.
  15. Fabris, Maria Pia Pedani. Dalla frontiera alla confine. Roma: 2002.
  16. Fekete, Lajos. ““Zur Geschichte der Grusiner des 16. Jahrhunderts””, Acta Orientalia 1/I (1950): 93-132.
  17. Göyünç, Nejat ve Wolf Dieter Hütteroth. Land an der Grenze: Osmanische Verwaltung im Heutigen Turkisch-Syrisch-Irakischen Grenzgebiet im 16. Jahrhundert. istanbul: 1997.
  18. Greatrex, Geoffrey ve Samuel N. C. Lieu. The Roman Eastern Frontier and the Persian Wars. Part II, AD 363-630. A narrative sourcebook. London-New York: 2002.
  19. Gündüz, Ahmet. Osmanlı idaresinde Musul (1523-1639). Elazığ: 2003.
  20. Işıksel, Güneş. La politique étrangère dans la seconde moitié du XVIe siècle: le cas de Selî