Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2015 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 5

Apparent diffusion coefficient for discriminating metastatic lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Pages
397–402
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Location of the primary tumor should be taken into account and cutoff values should be determined sepa-rately for each anatomical location.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck.METHODSPatients with metastatic lymph nodes underwent 1.5 Tesla diffusion-weighted magnetic reso-nance imaging (MRI).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to identify ADC threshold values.RESULTSWe included 33 patients (27 males, 6 females; mean age, 60.7 years) with 53 metastatic lymph nodes in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Location of the primary tumor should be taken into account and cutoff values should be determined sepa-rately for each anatomical location.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck.METHODSPatients with metastatic lymph nodes underwent 1.5 Tesla diffusion-weighted magnetic reso-nance imaging (MRI). The ADC values of the histologically proven metastases were evaluated retro-spectively and mean ADC values were compared using one-way analysis of variance test. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to identify ADC threshold values.RESULTSWe included 33 patients (27 males, 6 females; mean age, 60.7 years) with 53 metastatic lymph nodes in the study. Mean ADC values for nodal metastases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) (n=7), oro-pharyngeal (n=12), laryngeal (n=27), and hypopharyngeal (n=7) carcinoma were (0.810±0.158)×10-3mm2/s, (0.985±0.099)×10-3 mm2/s, (1.037±0.150)×10-3 mm2/s, and (0.948±0.081)×10-3 mm2/s, respec-tively. The mean ADC values of nodal metastases of NPC were significantly lower than ADC values of laryngeal carcinoma (LSCC) (P = 0.002). An ADC value less than 0.890×10-3 mm2/s was found to facilitate differentiation of NPC from LSCC with a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 85% (area under the curve, 0.852).CONCLUSIONThe mean ADC values showed significant differences between nodal metastases of NPC and LSCC. Considering SCCs as a single group may affect the accuracy of ADC-based differentiation. Location of the primary tumor should be taken into account and cutoff values should be determined sepa-rately for each anatomical location.

🔖

Cite This Article

PEKÇEVİK, Y., ÇUKUROVA, İ., ARSLAN, İ. B. (2015). Apparent diffusion coefficient for discriminating metastatic lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 5, 397–402. https://ajindex.com/articles/208409

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. de Bondt RB, Hoeberigs MC, Nelemans PJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and additional value of diffusion-weighted imaging for discrimination of malignant cervical lymph nodes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Neuroradiolo- gy 2009; 51:183-192. [CrossRef] Friedrich KM, Matzek W, Gentzsch S, Sulzbach- er I, Czerny C, Herneth AM. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Eur J Radiol 2008; 68:493-498. [CrossRef] Hauser T, Essig M, Jensen A, et al. Characteriza- tion and therapy monitoring of head and neck carcinomas using diffusion-imaging-based intravoxel incoherent motion parameters-pre- liminary results. Neuroradiology 2013; 55:527- 536. [CrossRef] Vandecaveye V, De Keyzer F, Dirix P, Lambrecht M, Nuyts S, Hermans R. Applications of diffu- sion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Neu- roradiology 2010; 52:773-784. [CrossRef] King AD, Ahuja AT, Yeung DK, et al. Malignant cervical lymphadenopathy: diagnostic accura- cy of diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiolo- gy 2007; 245:806-813. [CrossRef] Sumi M, Ichikawa Y, Nakamura T. Diagnostic ability of apparent diffusion coefficients for lymphomas and carcinomas in the pharynx. Eur Radiol 2007; 17:2631-2637. [CrossRef] Ichikawa Y, Sumi M, Sasaki M, Sumi T, Nakamu- ra T. Efficacy of diffusion-weighted imaging for the differentiation between lymphomas and carcinomas of the nasopharynx and oro- pharynx: correlations of apparent diffusion coefficients and histologic features. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33:761-766. [CrossRef] Vandecaveye V, De Keyzer F, Vander Poorten V, et al. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for nodal stag- ing. Radiology 2009; 251:134-146. [CrossRef] Varoquaux A, Rager O, Lovblad KO, et al. Func- tional imaging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with diffusion-weighted MRI and FDG PET/CT: quantitative analysis of ADC and SUV. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2013; 40:842-852. [CrossRef] Maeda M, Kato H, Sakuma H, Maier SE, Takeda K. Usefulness of the apparent diffusion coeffi- cient in line scan diffusion-weighted imaging for distinguishing between squamous cell carcinomas and malignant lymphomas of the head and neck. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26:1186-1192.
  2. Perrone A, Guerrisi P, Izzo L, et al. Diffu- sion-weighted MRI in cervical lymph nodes: dif- ferentiation between benign and malignant le- sions. Eur J Radiol 2011; 77:281-286. [CrossRef] Kato H, Kanematsu M