SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Urological Surgery / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4

Current Approaches to Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Use of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Urological Procedures

Cerrahi Öncesi Profilakside Güncel Yaklaşımlar Işığında Ürolojik Preoperatif Antibiyotik Uygulamaları

Pınar ŞEN
TUNA DEMİRDAL
Pages
159–166
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review presents the current recommendations on the use of prophylactic antimicrobial agents for the prevention of SSIs and recommendations about antimicrobial prophylaxis in urological procedures

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the most common and preventable type of healthcare-associated infections in low and middle-income countries and affect one-third of patients that have undergone surgical procedures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As the number of surgical procedures performed increases, the prevention of SSIs becomes more important.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review presents the current recommendations on the use of prophylactic antimicrobial agents for the prevention of SSIs and recommendations about antimicrobial prophylaxis in urological procedures
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the most common and preventable type of healthcare-associated infections in low and middle-income countries and affect one-third of patients that have undergone surgical procedures. As the number of surgical procedures performed increases, the prevention of SSIs becomes more important. It is considered that, it is possible to prevent approximately half of all SSI cases. However, due to the contribution of many factors to the development of SSIs, it may be difficult to effectively prevent these infections, and there is a need to take various preventive measures before, during and after surgery. This review presents the current recommendations on the use of prophylactic antimicrobial agents for the prevention of SSIs and recommendations about antimicrobial prophylaxis in urological procedures

Özet

Cerrahi alan enfeksiyonları (CAE) en sık görülen sağlık bakımıyla ilişkili enfeksiyonlar olup önlenebilir olması nedeniyle önem arz etmektedir. CAE önlenmesi için uygulama çeşitleri gittikçe artmakta ve buna bağlı olarak kanıta dayalı müdahale talepleri gün geçtikçe artmaktadır. Bu nedenle önceden yayınlanan kılavuzlara ek güncelleme ihtiyacı doğmaktadır. Yeni ve güncellenmiş öneriler sadece sağlık mensupları için değil, aynı zamanda profesyonel dernek ve kuruluşlar için de bir kaynak olabilme özelliğini taşımaktadır. Bu derlemede CAE önlemeye yönelik profilaktik antimikrobiyal ajan kullanımıyla ilgili güncel önerileri sunmak amaçlanmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞEN, P., DEMİRDAL, T. (2017). Current Approaches to Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Use of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Urological Procedures. Journal of Urological Surgery, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 4, 159–166. https://ajindex.com/articles/207936

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. World Health Organization; 2016. Global Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection. 2016; http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstre am/10665/250680/1/9789241549882-eng.pdf?ua=1. Accessed August 8, 2017
  2. Gunaydın M, Erdoğan M. Güncel Bilgiler Işığında Cerrahi Alan İnfeksiyonu Nedir, Ne Değildir
  3. ANKEM Akılcı Antibiyotik Kullanım Kongresi, 4-8 Mayıs 2016
  4. Magill SS, Hellinger W, Cohen J, Kay R, Bailey C, Boland B, Carey D, de Guzman J, Dominguez K, Edwards J, Goraczewski L, Horan T, Miller M, Phelps M, Saltford R, Seibert J, Smith B, Starling P, Viergutz B, Walsh K, Rathore M, Guzman N, Fridkin S. Prevalence of healthcare-associated infections in acute care hospitals in Jacksonville, Florida. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2012;33:283-291
  5. UHESA Özet raporu 2014: http://www.saglik.gov.tr/TR/dosya/197084/ h/2014-ulusal-ozet-rapor-1.pdf. Erişim: 8 Ağustos 2017
  6. Mu Y, Edwards JR, Horan TC, Berrios-Torres SI, Fridkin SK. Improving riskadjusted measures of surgical site infection for the national healthcare safety network. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:970-986
  7. DeFrances CJ, Podgornik MN. 2004 National Hospital Discharge Survey. Adv Data 2006:1-19
  8. Umscheid CA, Mitchell MD, Doshi JA, Agarwal R, Williams K, Brennan PJ. Estimating the proportion of healthcare-associated infections that are reasonably preventable and the related mortality and costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:101-114
  9. Aygin D, Marul F. Cerrahi Alan Enfeksiyonu Tanımlarında Yenilikler ve Ameliyat Öncesi Tüy Temizliğinde Güncel Uygulamalar. Online Türk Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 2016;1:28-36
  10. Awad SS. Adherence to surgical care improvement Project measures and post-operative surgical site infections. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2012;13:234- 237
  11. Bruce J, Russell EM, Mollison J, Krukowski ZH. The quality of measurement of surgical wound infection as the basis for monitoring: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect 2001;49:99-108
  12. National Healthcare Safety Network, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Surgical site infection (SSI) event. http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/ pdfs/pscmanual/9pscssicurrent.pdf. Published January 2017. Accessed August 8, 2017
  13. Jarvis WR. Benchmarking for prevention: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) system experience. Infection 2003;31(Suppl 2):44-48
  14. Fry DE. Fifty ways to cause surgical site infections. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2011;12:497-500
  15. Centers f