Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2013 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

Laparoskopik Sakrohisteropeksi: Uterovajinal Prolapsus İçin Uterin Süspansiyon Tekniği

A Case of Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy: A Uterus Preserving Surgical Procedure for the Treatment of Uterine Prolapse

Pages
56–58
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy is an effective, safe and conservative procedure for the treatment of uterine prolapse

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is defined as the descent of pelvic organs from normal position due to pelvic floor dysfunction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A woman has a 11% life time risk of undergoing surgery for POP.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy is an effective, safe and conservative procedure for the treatment of uterine prolapse
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is defined as the descent of pelvic organs from normal position due to pelvic floor dysfunction. A woman has a 11% life time risk of undergoing surgery for POP. A case of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy, a uterus preserving surgical procedure for the treatment of uterine prolapse is presented and 6 month follow up outcomes are reported. A 26 year-old woman presented with complaints of a mass bulging out of her vagina and pressure feeling in her pelvis. Her pelvic examination revealed second degree uterine prolapse with no prolapse of anterior and posterior vaginal walls. She underwent laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy. On her follow up at first and sixth months postoperatively, she had remained asymptomatic. Her pelvic examination revealed no uterine prolapse. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy is an effective, safe and conservative procedure for the treatment of uterine prolapse

Özet

Pelvik organ prolapsusu, pelvik organların pelvik taban disfonksiyonu sebebiyle normal pozisyonundan aşağı yer değiş- tirmesi olarak tanımlanır. Bir kadının pelvik organ prolapsusu sebebiyle yaşam boyu ameliyat olma riski %11'dir. Uterovajinal prolapsus tedavisinde uterus koruyucu bir cerrahi prosedür olan laparoskopik sakrohisteropeksi vakası ve 6 aylık takibi sunulmuştur. Yirmialtı yaşındaki hasta kliniğimize ele gelen kitle ve sarkma hissi şikayetleriyle başvurdu. Hastanın pelvik muayenesinde ikinci derece uterus desensusu olduğu saptandı. Hastaya laparoskopik sakrohisteropeksi uygulandı. Hastanın postoperatif 1. ve 6. aydaki kontrollerinde hastanın asemptomatik olduğu görüldü. Hastanın pelvik muayenesinde desensusu olmadığı saptandı. Laparoskopik sakrohisteropeksi uterovajinal prolapsus tedavisinde uygulanabilecek etkili, güvenli ve konservatif bir tedavi seçeneğidir

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜCEL, Ö. S., SELÇUK, İ., YAZICIOĞLU, A., BOYRAZ, G., BOZDAĞ, G., ESİNLER, İ. (2013). Laparoskopik Sakrohisteropeksi: Uterovajinal Prolapsus İçin Uterin Süspansiyon Tekniği. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 56–58. https://ajindex.com/articles/207804

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. M. F. Fialkow, K. M. Newton, G. M. Lentz, N. S. Weiss. Lifetime risk of surgical management for pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 2008
  2. 440 2. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ pro?lapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1997
  3. Baden WF, Walker T. Genesis of vaginal profile: a corre?lated classification of vaginal relaxation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1972
  4. 54 4. Mohamed Hefni, Tarek El-Toucky. Uterine prolapse in young women. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2011
  5. 65 5. Elisabetta Costantinia, Luigi Mearinia, Vittorio Binib, Alessandro Zucchia, Ettore Mearinia, Massimo Porenaa. Uterus Preservation in Surgical Correction of Urogenital Prolapse. European Urology 2005
  6. 9 6. Christine C. Skiadas, Donald P. Goldstein, Marc R. Laufer.The Manchester-Fothergill Procedure as a Fertility Sparing Alternative for Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Young Women. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 89-93, April 2006 7. O'Brien PM, Ibrahim J. Failure of laparoscopic uterine suspension to provide a lasting cure for uterovaginal pro?lapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994
  7. Maher C, FCarey MP,Murray CJ Laparoscopic suture hys?teropexy for uterine prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2001
  8. N Price, A Slack,SR Jackson. Laparoscopic hysteropexy: the initial results of a uterine suspension procedure for uterovaginal prolapse. An International Journal of Obs - tetrics and Gynaecology DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528. 2009.02396.x 10. L. Mouritsen and J. P. Larsen, Symptoms, bother and POPQ in women referred with pelvic organ prolapse," International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, vol. 14, no.2, pp. 2003
  9. 7 11. B. Bojahr, G. Tchartchian, M.Waldschmidt, R. Ohlinger, and R. L. DeWilde. Laparoscopic Sacropexy: A Retros - pective Analysis of the Subjective Outcome in 310 Cases. Obstetrics and Gynecology International Volume 2012, Article ID 538426, doi:10.1155/2012/538426 12. G. Busby, J. Broome. Successful pregnancy outcome fol?lowing laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy for second degree uterine prolapse. Gynecol Surg DOI 10.1007/s10397-008- 0460-4