SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3

The Effect of Range Management on Soil Carbon Content in Degraded Soil

İRFAN OĞUZ
RASİM KOÇYİĞİT
SABİT ERŞAHİN
Pages
133–137
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results showed that the applications did not cause a significant difference in topsoil SOC, IOC and TOC values, but significant differences were observed in subsoil (p < 0.001).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Degradation of soil and plant vegetation is a serious problem in grasslands at Central Antolian Region of Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was conducted to evaluate the impacts of treatments; fertilized + planted + protected from grazing (A), Fertilized + protected from grazing (B), protected from grazing (C), and grazed (D) on soil organic carbon (SOC), inorganic carbon (IOC) and total carbon (TOC) content at four natural parcels between 2004-2008 in Sivas, Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results showed that the applications did not cause a significant difference in topsoil SOC, IOC and TOC values, but significant differences were observed in subsoil (p < 0.001).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004-2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Grassland management · soil organic carbon · inorganic carbon

Abstract

Degradation of soil and plant vegetation is a serious problem in grasslands at Central Antolian Region of Turkey. Soils and plant vegetation in this region are highly degraded due to uncontrolled heavy grazing. Measures should be taken to restore the degraded grasslands to effectively prevent desertification in this region. This study was conducted to evaluate the impacts of treatments; fertilized + planted + protected from grazing (A), Fertilized + protected from grazing (B), protected from grazing (C), and grazed (D) on soil organic carbon (SOC), inorganic carbon (IOC) and total carbon (TOC) content at four natural parcels between 2004-2008 in Sivas, Turkey. Results showed that the applications did not cause a significant difference in topsoil SOC, IOC and TOC values, but significant differences were observed in subsoil (p < 0.001). The highest TOC content was found in degraded grassland and the SOC value was found lower in planted, fertilized and protected parcel than open grazed parcel. Hence, the increasing of SOC in degreaded lands may take longer time than the expected time in arid climate.

🔖

Cite This Article

OĞUZ, İ., KOÇYİĞİT, R., ERŞAHİN, S. (2015). The Effect of Range Management on Soil Carbon Content in Degraded Soil. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3, 133–137. https://ajindex.com/articles/207778

References (13)

  1. Bai, Y.F., Wu, J.G., Clark, C.M., Naeem, S., Pan, Q.M., Huang, J.H., Zhang, L.X., Han, X.G. (2010). Tradeoffs and thresholds in the effects of nitrogen addition on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: evidence from inner Mongolia Grasslands. Global Change and Biology; 16;358–372.
  2. Camargo, P.B., Trumbore, S.E., Martinelli, L.A., Davidson, E.A., Nepstad, D.C., Victoria, R.L., 1999. Soil carbon dynamics in regrowing forest of eastern Amazonia. Global Change Biology; 5, 693–702.
  3. Chen, Y.X., Lee, P., Lee, G., Mariko, S., Oikawa, T. (2006). Simulating root responses to grazing of a Mongolian grassland ecosystem. Plant Ecology; 183;265–275.
  4. Chen, J.Q., Shi, N. (2007). The preliminary study on possible scenarios of flood and drought in china in the case of global warming. Chin Geogr Sci; 6;145–154.
  5. Conant, R.T., Paustian, K., Elliott, E.T. (2001). Grassland management and conversion into grassland: effects on soil carbon. Ecol Appl; 11;343–355.
  6. Elmore, A.J., Asner, G.P. (2006). Effects of grazing intensity on soil carbon stocks following deforestation of a Hawaiian dry tropical forest. Global Change Biology; 12; 1761–1772.
  7. Franzluebbers, A.J., Stuedemann, J.A., Schomberg, H.H., Wilkinson, S.R. (2000). Soil organic C and N pools under long-term pasture management in the Southern Piedmont USA. Soil Biology Biochemistry; 32;469–478.
  8. Garcia-Oliva, F., Lancho, J.F.G., Montano, N.M., Islas, P. (2006). Soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics followed by a forest-to-pasture conversion inwesternMexico. Agroforestry Systems; 66; 93–100.
  9. Gebhart, D.L., Johnson, H.B., Mayeux, H.S., Polley, H.W. (1994). The CRP increases soil organic carbon. Journal of Soil Water Conservation; 49;488–492.
  10. Genckan, S., 1992. Rangeland menagement (In Turkish). Egean University, Agriculture Faculty, No. 483, Izmir, Turkey Koutika, L.S., Bartoli, F., Andreux, F., Cerri, C.C., Burtin, G., Chone, T., Philippy, R., 1997.Organic matter dynamics and aggregation in soils under rain forest and pastures of increasing age in the eastern Amazon Basin. Geoderma 76 (1–2), 87–112.
  11. Lal, R., Follett, R.F, Kimble,J., Cole, C.V. (1999). Managing U.S. cropland to sequester carbon in soil. Journal of Soil Water Conservation; 54;374–381.
  12. Li, J., Lin, S., Taube, F., Pan, Q., Dittert, K. (2011). Above and belowground net primary productivity of grassland influenced by supplemental water and nitrogen in Inner Mongolia. Plant Soil; 340;253–264.
  13. Milchunas, D.G., Lauenroth, W.K. (2001). Belowground primary production by carbo