Journals / Haseki Tıp Bülteni / 2016 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of Sugammadex and Neostigmine in Terms of Time to Extubation in Pediatrics

Çocuklarda Sugammadeks ve Neostigmin Kullanımının Ekstübasyon Süreleri Açısından Karşılaştırılması

Pages
207–211
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, there is a limited number of studies on the safety and side effects of sugammadex in pediatric patients and additional data are needed to establish the safety in clinical practice

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim:­ Sugammadex is a cyclodextrin compound which provides complete recovery of residual neuromuscular blockade.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we compared sugammadex and neostigmine in terms of time to achieve a train-of-four (TOF) ratio of 0.9 and extubation time (TE).Methods: Thirty-seven patients, without lung disease and neuromuscular disease undergoing lower urinary tract surgery and inguinal hernia, were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, there is a limited number of studies on the safety and side effects of sugammadex in pediatric patients and additional data are needed to establish the safety in clinical practice
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim:­ Sugammadex is a cyclodextrin compound which provides complete recovery of residual neuromuscular blockade. In this study, we compared sugammadex and neostigmine in terms of time to achieve a train-of-four (TOF) ratio of 0.9 and extubation time (TE).Methods: Thirty-seven patients, without lung disease and neuromuscular disease undergoing lower urinary tract surgery and inguinal hernia, were included in the study. Noninvasive arterial pressure, heart rate, pulse oximetry, and TOF-watch SX values were monitored during the surgery and, these parameters were recorded. After the surgery was completed, the patients were randomized into two groups: patients received either group neostigmine (group N) 0.05 mcg/kg and group sugammadex (group S) 2 mg/kg at reappearance of TOF ratio T2. Time to recovery to the TOF ratio of 0.9 (T0.9) and TE were compared between sugammadex and neostigmine Results:­TE was found to be statistically longer in group N (6.06±2.47 minute) than in group S (4.30±2.48 minute) (p<0.041).Conclusion: We observed that sugammadex was more rapidly and effectively reversed the neuromuscular blockade compared to neostigmine. There were no serious adverse effects and significant hemodynamic changes in any measurement time. However, there is a limited number of studies on the safety and side effects of sugammadex in pediatric patients and additional data are needed to establish the safety in clinical practice

Özet

Amaç: Sugammadeks rezidüel nöromüsküler bloğun kısa sürede tam olarak geri dönüşünü sağlayan siklodekstrin grubu bir ilaçtır. Bu çalışmada sugammadeks ve neostigminin dörtlü uyarı (Train of Four - TOF) 0,9 oranına ulaşma zamanı ve ekstübasyon süreleri (TE) değerlendirildi.Yöntemler: Alt üriner sistem veya inguinal herni cerrahisi geçiren, akciğer hastalığı, nöromüsküler hastalığı olmayan 37 hasta, iki gruba ayrılarak çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastalar cerrahi operasyon sonunda nöromüsküler monitorizasyon yapılarak ekstübe edildi. Grup neostigmin (grup N): Cerrahi operasyon bitiminde TOF 2 olduğunda, intravenöz 0,05 mg/kg neostigmin uygulandı. Grup sugammadeks (grup S): Cerrahi operasyon bitiminde TOF 2 olduğunda, intravenöz 2 mg/kg sugammadeks uygulandı, TOF >=0,9 ulaşma süresi (T0,9) ve antagonist enjeksiyonunda ekstübasyona kadar geçen süre kaydedildi. Parametreler istatistiksel olarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Grup N'deki olgularda TE 6,06±2,47 dakika, grup S'deki olgularda TE 4,30±2,48 dakika olarak saptandı (p<0,041).Sonuç: Sugammadeksin, neostigmine göre daha kısa sürede nöromüsküler bloğu ortadan kaldırdığı saptandı. Ölçüm zamanlarının hiçbirinde hemodinamik bakımdan ve komplikasyonlar açısından ciddi bir değişiklik saptanmadı. Fakat çocuklarda ilacın güvenilirliği ve yan etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi açısından sınırlı sayıda çalışma mevcuttur ve ilacın klinik uygulamasındaki güvenilirliği için daha çok çalışmaya ihtiyaç vardır

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜZELCE, D., KENDİGELEN, P., TÜTÜNCÜ, A. Ç., KAYA, G., ALTINTAŞ, F. (2016). Comparison of Sugammadex and Neostigmine in Terms of Time to Extubation in Pediatrics. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 4, 207–211. https://ajindex.com/articles/207667

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Kaan MN. Postoperatif nöromüsküler blokaj. Turkiye Klinikleri J Anest Reanim-Special Topics 2011;4:67-74. Mirakhur RK. Sugammadex in clinical practice. Anaesthesia 2009;64(Suppl 1):45-54. Viby-Mogensen J. Neuromuscular monitoring. In: Miller RD, editor. Anaesthesia. 4th ed. New York, Edinburg, London, Melburn: Churchill Livingstone Inc; 1994. p. 1345-61.
  2. Hemmerling TM, Le N. Brief review: Neuromuscular monitoring: an update for the clinician. Can J Anaesth 2007;54:58-72. Eriksson LI. Evidence-based practice and neuromuscular monitoring: it's time for routine quantitative assessment. Anesthesiology 2003;98:1037-9.
  3. Mhyre JM, Riesner MN, Polley LS, et al. A series of anesthesia- related maternal deaths in Michigan, 1985-2003. Anesthesiology 2007;106:1096-104.
  4. Plaud B, Meretoja O, Hofmockel R, et al. Reversal of rocuronium- induced neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex in pediatric and adult surgical patients. Anesthesiology 2009;110:284-94. Naguib M. Pharmacology of muscle relaxant and their antagonists. Neuromuscular physiology and pharmacology. In: Miller RD editor. Anaesthesia. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Churchil Livingston 2006. p. 481-572.
  5. McDonagh DL, Benedict PE, Kovac AL, et al. Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of sugammadex for the reversal of rocuronium- induced neuromuscular blockade in elderly patients. Anesthesiology 2011;114:318-29.
  6. Jones RK, Caldwell JE, Brull SJ, et al. Reversal of profound rocuronium-induced blockade with sugammadex: a randomized comparison with neostigmine. Anesthesiology 2008;109:816-24.
  7. Sorgenfrei IF, Norrild K, Larsen PB, et al. Reversal of rocuronium- induced neuromuscular block by the selective relaxant binding agent sugammadex: a dose-finding and safety study. Anesthesiology 2006;104:667-74.
  8. Shields M, Giovannelli M, Mirakhur RK, et al. Org 25969 (sugammadex), a selective relaxant binding agent for antagonism of prolonged rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth 2006;96:36-43.
  9. Üstün YB, Sarıhasan B, Kocamanoğlu İS, et al. Use of sugammadex in myasthenia gravis and Becker muscular dystrophy: Four cases. J Neurol Sci 2012;33:826-31.
  10. Gümüş F, Kurtipek Ö, Bedirli N. Çocuklarda nöromusküler bloğun geri çevrilmesinde neostigmin ile sugammadeksin karşılaştırılması. Özet Kitabı. TARK; 2012. p. 47. Schaller SJ, Fink H, Ulm K, et al. Sugammadex and neostigmine dose-finding study for reversal of shallow residual neuromuscular block. Anesthesiology 2010;113:1054-60.
  11. Lemmens HJ, El-Orbany MI, Berry J, et al. Reversal