Journals / Anestezi Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

The comparison of thoracic epidural ropivacaine with ropivacaine-ketamine combination

Torakal epidural ropivakain ile ropivakain ve ketamin kombinasyonunun karşılaştırılması

Pages
84–91
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: In conclusion, during major upper abdominal surgery, 0,2 % ropivacaine was more effective in providing analgesia than a 0,1 % ropivacaine + 0,4 mg mL-1 ketamine combination in thoracal epidural analgesia (TEA).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: This study was aimed to compare the analgesic effect of epidurally administered ropivacaine 0,2 % with ropivacaine 0,1 % and ketamine 0,4 mg mL-1 combination in patients following upper abdominal surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS: In a prospectively randomised controlled trial, we studied 40 adult, ASA I-III patients undergoing elective major upper abdominal surgery, once we had obtained the approval of the local ethical committee.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: In conclusion, during major upper abdominal surgery, 0,2 % ropivacaine was more effective in providing analgesia than a 0,1 % ropivacaine + 0,4 mg mL-1 ketamine combination in thoracal epidural analgesia (TEA).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ketamin · Analjezi · Karşılaştırmalı çalışma

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was aimed to compare the analgesic effect of epidurally administered ropivacaine 0,2 % with ropivacaine 0,1 % and ketamine 0,4 mg mL-1 combination in patients following upper abdominal surgery. METHODS: In a prospectively randomised controlled trial, we studied 40 adult, ASA I-III patients undergoing elective major upper abdominal surgery, once we had obtained the approval of the local ethical committee. This study was intended to compare thoracal epidurally administered (Th5-7) 0.2 % ropivacaine with 0.1 % ropivacaine and 0.4 mg mL-1 ketamin combination used preoperatively. Operations were performed under general anesthesia. Patient controlled analgesia (PCA) pumps with same infusion rates continued until postoperative 48th hours. Pain was evaluated using the visual analog score (VAS) on resting and coughing, PCA drug and analgesic consumption, blocked segment numbers (BSN) and motor block were recorded. RESULT: In our study on 1th and 2th days BSNs were significantly higher in group R when compared with group RK (p<0.05). In Group R VAS values at rest for postoperative 1th and 6th hours, and VAS values on coughing for postoperative 1th , 6th and 12th hours were significantly lower (p<0.05). Drug consumption with PCA and need for rescue analgesic were also significantly lower Group R (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, during major upper abdominal surgery, 0,2 % ropivacaine was more effective in providing analgesia than a 0,1 % ropivacaine + 0,4 mg mL-1 ketamine combination in thoracal epidural analgesia (TEA).

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada amacımız, majör üst batın operasyonu uygulanan olgularda, epidural % 2 ropivakain ile % 1 ropivakain ve 0,4 mg mL-1 ketamin kombinasyonunun analjezik etkinliğinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Yöntem: Çalışma klinik, prospektif ve randomize olarak planlandı. Elektif majör üst batın cerrahisi planlanan ASA I-III risk grubundan 40 erişkin hasta üzerinde etik komite onayı ile gerçekleştirildi. Bu çalışma torakal epidural (T5-7) kateterden preemptif olarak % 0,2 ropivakain (Grup R) veya % 0,1 ropivakain ve 0,4 mg mL-1 ketamin (Grup RK) kombinasyonu uygulanarak gerçek- leştirildi. Operasyon genel anestezi altında sürdürüldü. Postoperatif analjezi, hasta kontrollü analjezi (HKA) cihazı ile aynı ilaç infüzyonları 48 saat sürdürülerek sağlandı. Hastaların istirahat ve öksürükte VAS ağrı skorları, bloke segment sayıları (BSS), motor blok düzeyleri, HKA ile ilaç tüketimleri ve ek analjezik (meperidin; mg) tüketimleri kaydedildi. Bulgular: Çalışmamızda BSS’ler 1. ve 2. günde R grubunda RK grubuna göre anlamlı şekilde yüksekti (p<0,05). R grubunda, istirahat VAS değerleri postoperatif 1.saat ve 6.saatte, öksürük VAS değerleri postoperatif 1.saat, 6. saat ve 12. saatlerde anlamlı şekilde düşüktü (p<0,05). HKA ilaç tüketimi ile ek analjezik kullanımı R grubunda anlamlı şekilde düşük bulundu (p<0,05). Sonuç: Sonuç olarak majör üst batın cerrahisinde, postoperatif analjezik etkiyi değerlendirmek amacıyla uygulanan torakal epidural analjezide (TEA) % 0,2 ropivakainin, % 0,1 ropivakain + 0,4 mg mL-1 ketamin kombinasyonuna göre daha başarılı olduğu saptandı.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇEKİÇ, B., ULUSOY, H., BEŞİR, A., SAATÇI, Ş. G., ÖZEN, İ. (2008). The comparison of thoracic epidural ropivacaine with ropivacaine-ketamine combination. Anestezi Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 84–91. https://ajindex.com/articles/207586

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Erdine S. Ağrı. İkinci baskı. Nobel Tıp kitabevleri, 2002,s. 20-29 2. Spenser S., Honorio T. Principles of Anesthesiology.Üçüncü baskı,1993, pp. 871-877 3. Arthur G, Feldman H, Covino BG. Comparative pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine and ropivacaine, a new amide local anaesthetic. Anesth Analg 1988; 67: 1053-58 4. Moller R, Covino BG. Cardiac electrophysiologic properties of bupivacaine and lidocaine compared with those of ropivacaine, a new amide local anesthetic. Anesthesiology 1990;72:22-29 5. Knudsen K, Beckman M, Blomberg SM, Blomberg S, Sjovall J, Edvardsson N.Central nervous and cardiovasculer effects of i.v. infusions of ropivacaine, bupivacaine and placebo in volunteers. Br J Anaesthesia 1997;78:507-14 6. Scott DB, Lee A, Fagon D, Bowler GM, Bloomfield P, Lundh R. Acute toxicity of ropivacaine compared with that of bupivacaine. Anesth Analg 1989;69:563-72 7. Chia Y, Liu K, Liu YC, Chang HC, Wong CS. Adding ketamine in a multimodal patient-controlled epidural regimen reduces posto- perative pain and analgesic consumption. Anesth Analg 1998; 86:1245-54 8. Stubhaug A, Breivik H, Eide PK, Kreunen M, Foss A. Mapping of punctuate hyperalgesia around a surgical incision demonstrates that ketamine is a powerful suppressor of central sensitization to pain fallowing surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1997;41:1124-32 9. Rocco AG, Mallampati R, Boon J, et al.:A double-blind evaluation of intrathecal bupivacaine and tetracaine. Reg Anesth, 9:183,1984 10. Wong CS, Lu CC, Cherng CH, Ho ST. Pre-emptive analgesia with ketamine, morphine and epidural lidocaine prior to total knee replacement. Can J Anaesth 1997;44:31-37 11.Moraco RJ, Sheldon D, Thirlby R. The role of epidural anesthesia and analgesia in surgical practice. Ann Surg 2003;238:663-73 12. Morrison LM, Emanuelsson BM, McClure JH, et al. Efficacy and kinetics of extradural ropivacaine: comparison with bupivacaine. Anesth Analg 1994;72:164-69 13. Liu SS, Moore JM, Luo AM, Trautman WJ, Carpenter RL. Comparison of three solutions of ropivacaine/ fentanyl for postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia. Anesthesiology 1999;90: 727-33 14. Bardner NH, Reid D, Sullian P, et al. Continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine for the prevention of postoperative pain after major orthopaedic surgery: a dose-finding study. Can J Anaesth 1996;43:17-22 15. Etches RC, Writer WDR, Ansley D, et al. Continuous epidural ropivacaine 0.2% for analgesia after lower abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg 1997;84:784-90 16. Kehlet