Journals / Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

-

A research on mobbing behaviors football trainers face in club environment

Pages
88–94
Publication Date
2014-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Hence, the research findings show that the behaviors of mobbing can be evaluated as features peculiar to football, and mostly the youngest trainers are influenced by this situation

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to determine the perceptions of football trainers about mobbing according to their age groups, license types, graduation levels and training years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this research, the Negative Acts Questionnaire (NAQ), which was developed by Einarsen, Raknes, Matthiesen and Hellesoy, adapted to Turkish by Cemaloğlu (6), applied to 754 trainers participating in the seminars within the cities of Ankara, Batman, Denizli, Diyarbakır, Elazığ, Gaziantep, Mardin, Tokat and Samsun whichin the trainer development seminars were organized jointly by the Turkish Football Federation and Turkish Football Coaches Association in 2010-2011.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Hence, the research findings show that the behaviors of mobbing can be evaluated as features peculiar to football, and mostly the youngest trainers are influenced by this situation
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2010-2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Football club · trainer · mobbing.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the perceptions of football trainers about mobbing according to their age groups, license types, graduation levels and training years. In this research, the Negative Acts Questionnaire (NAQ), which was developed by Einarsen, Raknes, Matthiesen and Hellesoy, adapted to Turkish by Cemaloğlu (6), applied to 754 trainers participating in the seminars within the cities of Ankara, Batman, Denizli, Diyarbakır, Elazığ, Gaziantep, Mardin, Tokat and Samsun whichin the trainer development seminars were organized jointly by the Turkish Football Federation and Turkish Football Coaches Association in 2010-2011. The missing and faulty questionnaires were excluded from the study, and 515 ones were evaluated. The data from the questionnaire were analyzed by the reliability analysis and the non-parametric variance analysis. There were statistically significant differences in the sub-dimensions of the negative acts scale between their age groups for football trainers (p0.05). As a result, it is possible to say that if sportive expectations are not met in football clubs, the pressures of football club managers, media or supporters may negatively affect on football trainers. Hence, the research findings show that the behaviors of mobbing can be evaluated as features peculiar to football, and mostly the youngest trainers are influenced by this situation

Özet

The aim of this study was to determine the perceptions of football trainers about mobbing according to their age groups, license types, graduation levels and training years. In this research, the Negative Acts Questionnaire (NAQ), which was developed by Einarsen, Raknes, Matthiesen and Hellesoy, adapted to Turkish by Cemaloğlu (6), applied to 754 trainers participating in the seminars within the cities of Ankara, Batman, Denizli, Diyarbakır, Elazığ, Gaziantep, Mardin, Tokat and Samsun whichin the trainer development seminars were organized jointly by the Turkish Football Federation and Turkish Football Coaches Association in 2010-2011. The missing and faulty questionnaires were excluded from the study, and 515 ones were evaluated. The data from the questionnaire were analyzed by the reliability analysis and the non-parametric variance analysis. There were statistically significant differences in the sub-dimensions of the negative acts scale between their age groups for football trainers (p<0.05). By the statistical analysis, the youngest age group (19-29) of football trainers was subjected to negative acts much more than the other age groups were detected. On the other hand, the perceptions of mobbing for football trainers were not significantly different in terms of their training years and graduation levels (p>0.05). As a result, it is possible to say that if sportive expectations are not met in football clubs, the pressures of football club managers, media or supporters may negatively affect on football trainers. Hence, the research findings show that the behaviors of mobbing can be evaluated as features peculiar to football, and mostly the youngest trainers are influenced by this situation.

🔖

Cite This Article

CENGIZ, R., YENEL, F., SUNAY, H. (2014). -. Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 88–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/206344

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Agervold M. Bullying at work: a discussion of definitions and prevalence, based on an emprical study. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 2007; 48: 161-172. 2. Aktop NG. Anadolu Üniversitesi Öğretim Elemanlarının Duygusal Tacize İlişkin Görüşleri ve Deneyimleri, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi:
  2. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Eskişehir, 2006. Aksoy F. Yıldırmanın (Mobbing) Sağlık Çalışanlarına Etkisi, Doktora Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi,
  3. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul, 2008. Cahppell D. Di Martino V. Violence at work. International Labour Organisation, Geneva, 2006; 70. Can Y. A Tipi ve B Tipi Kişilikler Bakımından Mobbing Kişilik İlişkisinin İncelenmesi ve Bir Uygulama, Yüksek Lisans, Kocaeli Üniversitesi,
  4. Sosyal bilimler Enstitüsü, Kocaeli, 2007. Cemaloğlu N. Okul yöneticilerinin liderlik stilleri ile yıldırma arasındaki ilişki. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Ankara, 2007; 33:7-87. Cengiz R. Profesyonel Futbol Kulübü Yöneticilerinin Dönüşümsel Liderlik Stilleri İle Kulüplerinin Örgüt Sağlığı ve Futbolcularının Yıldırma (Mobbing) Yaşamaları Arasındaki İlişki, Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi,
  5. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, 2008.
  6. Davenport N, Schwartz RD, Elliott GP. Mobbing, Sistem Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 2003.
  7. Dikmetaş E, Top M, Ergin G. Asistan hekimlerin tükenmişlik ve mobbing düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 2011; 22:1-15. Ekşici Ş. Kurum ve Kuruluşlarında Psikolojik Taciz (Mobbing) Eylemleri ve Çalışanların Motivasyonu Üzerine etkisi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi,
  8. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Konya, 2009.
  9. Einarsen S, Matthıesen SB, Skogstad A. Bullying, burnout and well-being among assistant nurses. Journal of Occupational Health and Safely - Australia and New Zealand, 1998; 14: 563–568. Fettahlıoğlu O. Örgütlerde Yıldırma (Mobbing): Üniversitelerde Üniversitesi,
  10. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, İzmir, 2008.
  11. Uygulama, Dokuz Eylül Gökçe TA. İş Yerinde Yıldırma: Özel ve Resmi İlköğretim Okulu Öğretmen ve Yöneticileri Üzerinde Bir Araştırma, Doktora. Ankara Üniversitesi,
  12. Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, 2006. Gülen Ö. The Relationship between Personality and Being Exposed to Workplace Bullying or Mobbing, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi,
  13. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul, 2008. Hubert A. Veldhoven M. Risk sector for undesirable behavior and mobbing. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2001; 10: 415-424. İyem C. Futbolda mobbing: Sakaryaspor A.