SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Examination of organizational commitment levels of physical education and sports teachers according to various variables (case study of Kutahya province)

Halil BISGIN
Pages
89–96
Publication Date
2014-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In order to set significant differences (α=0.05) in the scope of the study, non-parametric statistical tests of Mann-Whitney U and Kruskall-Wallis tests were conducted according to the results of normality test.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to examine the organizational commitment of the physical education and sports teachers, working in the center of Kutahya Province of Turkey, on the basis of their socio-demographic characteristics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:One-hundred-and-twenty-six (126) physical education and sports teachers voluntarily participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In order to set significant differences (α=0.05) in the scope of the study, non-parametric statistical tests of Mann-Whitney U and Kruskall-Wallis tests were conducted according to the results of normality test.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Organizational Commitment · Physical Education and Sports Teachers · Sports

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine the organizational commitment of the physical education and sports teachers, working in the center of Kutahya Province of Turkey, on the basis of their socio-demographic characteristics. One-hundred-and-twenty-six (126) physical education and sports teachers voluntarily participated in the study. Turkish version of the Organizational Commitment Scale developed by Allen and Meyer (1991) was used in this study for data collection. In order to set significant differences (α=0.05) in the scope of the study, non-parametric statistical tests of Mann-Whitney U and Kruskall-Wallis tests were conducted according to the results of normality test. In conclusion while affective commitment of the participants' was found to be the highest continuance commitment was found to be the least. Also significant differences emerged between participants' organizational commitment sub dimensions and their gender, age, marital status and professional experience.

🔖

Cite This Article

BISGIN, H. (2014). Examination of organizational commitment levels of physical education and sports teachers according to various variables (case study of Kutahya province). Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 89–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/206198

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Allen NJ, Meyer JP. Organizational commitment: evidence of career stage effects. Journal of Business Research, 1990; 26(1): 17. Altınoz M, Çop S, Çakıroğlu D, Kervancı F, Keskin N. A Field study on the link between perceived organizational support and office workers’ organizational commitment. Journal of Süleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences, 2013; 1(Special Volume on Office Management): 149-163. Balay R. Yönetici ve Öğretmenlerde Örgütsel Bağlılık. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, 2000.
  2. Baysal AC, Paksoy M. mesleğe ve örgüte bağlılığın çok yönlü incelenmesinde meyer-allen modeli. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 1990; 28(1): 7-15. Bergman ME. The relationship between affective and normative commitment: review and research agenda. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2006; 27: 645–663.
  3. Boylu Y, Pelit E, Gucer E. A Study on the level organizational commitment of academicians. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar, 2007; 44 (511): 55–74. Brown BB. Employees` organizational commitment and their perception of supervisors` relations-oriented and task- oriented leadership behaviors. Dissertation, Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2003. Cetin MÖ. Örgüt kültürü ve örgütsel bağlılık. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, 2004.
  4. Dogan S, Kilic S. The situation and importance of empowerment in obtaining organizational commitment. Erciyes University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 2007; 29: 37-61.
  5. Durna U, Eren V. The examination of organisational commitment in connection with three components of commitment. Dogus University Journal, 2005; 6(2): 210–219.
  6. Ersoy S, Bayraktaroglu S. Örgütsel Bağlılık. (editör: Derya Ergun Özler). Örgütsel Davranışta Güncel Konular. İstanbul: Ekin Yayın Evi, 2010. Goleman D. İşbaşında duygusal zeka. İstanbul: Varlık Yayınları. İkinci Baskı, 2000.
  7. Greenberg J, Baron RA. Behavior in Organizations. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc. Seventh Edition, 2000.
  8. Guler YE, Bişgin H, Ustun UD. Beden eğitimi ve spor öğretmenlerinin bağlılık alt ölçeği ile incelenmesi. 2nd International Physical Education and Sports Congress for the Disabled. II. Uluslararası Engellilerde Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Kongresi, Batman, 2014. baglılıklarının duygusal Gundogan T. Örgütsel bağlılık: Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası uygulaması uzmanlık yeterlik tezi. Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası İnsan Kaynakları Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara, 2009: 129. Gurbuz S. A research on identifying the relationships between o