Journals / Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of Gross Motor Development of 3-7 Years Old Children in Different Geographical Regions

Pages
174–183
Publication Date
2018-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, gross motor total test scores of children in seven age group living in the Black Sea Region were found to be significantly higher than the gross motor total test scores of children living in Eastern Anatolia.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to determine whether gross motor development of 3-7 years old children differed according to their geographical regions. 131 children from the Mediterranean Region, 149 children from the Southeastern Anatolia Region, 214 children from the Marmara Region, 107 children from the Aegean Region, 114 children from the Black Sea Region, 161 children from the Central Anatolia Region, 115 from the Eastern Anatolia Region children were included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Of the children participating in the study, 475 were girls and 516 were boys.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, gross motor total test scores of children in seven age group living in the Black Sea Region were found to be significantly higher than the gross motor total test scores of children living in Eastern Anatolia.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Gross motor development · children · TGMD-2

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine whether gross motor development of 3-7 years old children differed according to their geographical regions. 131 children from the Mediterranean Region, 149 children from the Southeastern Anatolia Region, 214 children from the Marmara Region, 107 children from the Aegean Region, 114 children from the Black Sea Region, 161 children from the Central Anatolia Region, 115 from the Eastern Anatolia Region children were included in the study. Of the children participating in the study, 475 were girls and 516 were boys. In order to collect data, Test of Gross Motor Development-Second Edition (TGMD-2) was used. Kruskal Wallis H test was used to compare locomotor, object control and gross motor total test scores of the three, four, five, six and seven age groups children according to the geographic regions. The results of the analysis showed that locomotor subtest scores of children aged 5 and 7 years were differentiated according to their geographical regions. Mann Whitney U test was used to determine the difference between the two groups. As a result of the paired comparisons, locomotor subtest scores of children in five age group living in Black Sea Region were found to be significantly lower than locomotor subtest scores of children living in Southeast Anatolia, Marmara and Central Anatolia Regions. The locomotor subtest scores of the children seven age in the Black Sea Region were significantly higher than the locomotor subtest scores of children living in Southeast Anatolia and Eastern Anatolia Regions. In addition, it was determined that gross motor total test scores of the children of seven age groups differed according to the geographical region. As a result, gross motor total test scores of children in seven age group living in the Black Sea Region were found to be significantly higher than the gross motor total test scores of children living in Eastern Anatolia.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEPELİ, K. (2018). Comparison of Gross Motor Development of 3-7 Years Old Children in Different Geographical Regions. Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3, 174–183. https://ajindex.com/articles/206186

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Akın S, Kalkavan A, Gülaç M. Okullar arası müsabakalara katılan 10-11 yaş grubu sporcu çocuklar ile spor yapmayan çocukların temel motor beceri düzeylerinin karşılaştırılması. Sportif Bakış: Spor ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2016; 3(1): 21-32
  2. Akın S. Okul öncesi 60-72 aylık çocukların temel motor beceri gelişiminde eğitsel oyunların etkisi. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Dumlupınar University, Kütahya, 2015
  3. Altınkök M. The effect of coordinated teaching method practices on motor some motor skills of 6-year-old children. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2017; 68: 49-61.4. Altunay-Arslantekin B. The effects of visual impairment on psychomotor development and independent mobility and supportive programs. Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, 2014; 2(3): 165-175.5. Aslan Ş. Hafif zihinsel engelli ergenlerde sporun motor beceriler üzerine etkisinin incelenmesi. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Trakya University, Edirne, 2015.6. Atasavun-Uysal S, Düger T. A comparison of motor skills in Turkish Children with different visual acuity. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon, 2011; 22(1): 23-29.7. Ballı ÖM. Bruininks-oseretsky motor yeterlik testinin geçerlik, güvenirlik çalışması ve beş-altı yaş grubu çocuklara uygulanan jimnastik eğitim programının motor gelişime etkisinin incelenmesi. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Ankara University, Ankara, 2006.8. Beken S. Montessori yöntemi etkinliklerinin 5–6 yaş çocuklarının el becerilerinin gelişimine etkisi. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, 2009.9. Bilgili M. Sosyal bilimler felsefesi açısından Türkiye’deki üniversitelerde bölgesel coğrafya öğretimi. Marmara Coğrafya Dergisi, 2016; 33: 114-134.10. Birch LL, Fisher JO. Development of eating behaviors among children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 1998; 101: 539-549.11. Boz M, Güngör-Aytar A. Okul öncesi çocuklarında temel hareket eğitim programının hareket becerilerine etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2012; 1: 51-59.12. Büyüköztürk Ş. Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. 9th ed. Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2008.13. Clark JE. Motor development, In: Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, Ramachandran VS ed. San Diego: Academic Press, 1994, 3: 245-255.14. Çelik A, Günay E, Aksu F. 7-9 Yaş grubu ilköğretim öğrencilerinin fiziksel ve motorik özelliklerinin değerlendirilmesi. DEÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 2013; 27(1): 7-13.15. Elvan L. Bölgesel gelişme ve bölgeler arası gelişmişlik farkları. Discussion Paper, No: 2012/6. Ankara: Turkish Economic Assoc