SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

According to the normal weight, overweight and obese comparison of bioelectric impedance analysis method with the other methods

Evrim CAKMAKCI
Fatma ARSLAN
Hüsamettin VATANSEV
Meryem AYRANCI
Pages
31–34
Publication Date
2015-07-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of anthropometric measurements was found BMI, waist circumference, and bioelectrical impedance analysis method for all the groups differ (p <0.05), waist / hip ratio values were found to be different between normal weight and obese groups (p <0.05) that participated in the research.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Women are faced with the problem of obesity because of over-nutrition, still life and birth weight.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study participated adult women that the mean age of normal weight 25.70 ± 7.85 (N = 17), overweight 32.47 ± 8.22 (N = 36), obese 38.12 ± 8.95 (N = 40) and total N = 93.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of anthropometric measurements was found BMI, waist circumference, and bioelectrical impedance analysis method for all the groups differ (p <0.05), waist / hip ratio values were found to be different between normal weight and obese groups (p <0.05) that participated in the research.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bioelectric impedance · obesity · body composition

Abstract

Women are faced with the problem of obesity because of over-nutrition, still life and birth weight. To Assess overweight and obesity are used with Body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist/hip ratio and skinfold thickness measurement method and Bioelectrical impedance analysis method. The purpose of this study was to compare of the methods used to assess body composition in normal weight, overweight and obese in adults women. In this study participated adult women that the mean age of normal weight 25.70 ± 7.85 (N = 17), overweight 32.47 ± 8.22 (N = 36), obese 38.12 ± 8.95 (N = 40) and total N = 93. Subjects’ body composition were evaluated with Body mass index, waist circumference, waist/hip ratio and skinfold thickness measurements and measured using bioelectric impedance analysis. For statically analysis, One Way Anova and Tukey tests were performed. Significance level was accepted as 0.05 for all tests. According to the results of anthropometric measurements was found BMI, waist circumference, and bioelectrical impedance analysis method for all the groups differ (p <0.05), waist / hip ratio values were found to be different between normal weight and obese groups (p <0.05) that participated in the research. Body mass index and bioelectric impedance are important methods to detect of obesity, and the waist circumference be used together these methods to determine the abdominal obesity may be more useful.

🔖

Cite This Article

CAKMAKCI, E., ARSLAN, F., VATANSEV, H., AYRANCI, M. (2015). According to the normal weight, overweight and obese comparison of bioelectric impedance analysis method with the other methods. Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 31–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/206111

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Bigaard J, Tjonneland A, Thomsen BL, Overvad K, Heitmann BL, Sorensen TI. Waist circumference, BMI, smoking, and mortality in middle-aged men and women. Obes Res 2003;11:895–903.
  2. Bilgiç, P. Sporcu ve Sporcu Olmayan Bireylerin Vücut Kompozisyonu ve Beslenme Durumları ile Serum Leptin Düzeylerinin Değerlendirilmesi.Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Toplu Beslenme SistemleriProgramı Bilim Uzmanlığı Tezi, Ankara. 2003 Bjorntorp P. (eds). International textbook of obesity. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, London, 2001
  3. Bosy-Westphal A, Geisler C, Onur S, Korth O, Selberg O, Schrezenmeir J, Müller MJ.et al. Value of body fat mass vs anthropometric obesity indices in the assessment of metabolic risk factors. Int J Obes 2006;30:475–83e-aged men and women. Obes Res 2003;11:895–903.
  4. De Lorenzo A, Sorge RP, Candeloro N, Di Campli C, Sesti G, Lauro R. New insights into body composition assessment in obese women. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1999; 77: 17-21.
  5. Ducimetiere P, Richard J, Cambien F. The pattern ofsubcutaneous fat distribution in middle-aged men and the risk of coronary heart disease: the Paris prospective study. Int J Obes 1986; 10: 229-40.
  6. Durnin JV, Womersley J. Body fat assessed from total bodydensity and its estimation from skinfold thickness:measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72years. Br J Nutr. 1974 Jul; 32(1):77-97.
  7. Expert Panel on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight in Adults. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: executive summary. Am J Clin Nutr 1998;68:899–917.
  8. Fuller N, Jebb SA, Laskey M, CowardW, Elia M. Four component model for the assessment of body composition in humans: comparison with alternative methods and evaluation of the density and hydration of fat free mass. Clinical Science 1992; 82: 687-93
  9. Gallagher D, Visser M, Sepulveda D, Pierson RN, Harris Tand Heymsfield SB. How useful is body mass index forcomparison of body fatness across age, sex and ethnic groups. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 143: 228-239.
  10. Gallagher D, Song MY. Evaluation of body composition: practical guidelines. Prim Care. 2003 Jun; 30(2):249-65.
  11. Guida B, De Nicola L, Trio R, Pecoraro P, Iodlce C, Memoli BComparison of vector and conventional bioelectricalimpedance analysis in the optimal dry weight prescription inhemodialysis. Am J Nephro.2000;120:311-318
  12. Hortobagyi T, Israel RG, O'Brien KF. Sensitivity and specificity of the Quetelet index to assess obesity in me