SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3

Examination Of Sport Managers' Self-Efficacy Status And Time Management

Ali ERDOĞAN
Erkan Faruk ŞİRİN
Pınar KARACAN DOĞAN
Ahmet Azmi YETİM
Pages
428–445
Publication Date
2020-01-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, a weak positive and significant (p <0.05) relationship was found between general time management and sports managers' self-efficacy (decision-making, personal characteristics, Knowledge and Interpersonal Roles).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to determine the self-efficacy perceptions and time management belief levels of the public and sports club managers working in Turkey and to examine the relationship between them by examining them according to some demographic variables.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample group of the public and sports club managers working in Turkey consists of public sports managers (n = 55) and sports club managers (n = 99) who volunteered to participate in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, a weak positive and significant (p <0.05) relationship was found between general time management and sports managers' self-efficacy (decision-making, personal characteristics, Knowledge and Interpersonal Roles).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sports Managers · Self-Efficacy · Time Management

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the self-efficacy perceptions and time management belief levels of the public and sports club managers working in Turkey and to examine the relationship between them by examining them according to some demographic variables. In this research, a method for descriptive and relational screening was used to reveal the current situation. The sample group of the public and sports club managers working in Turkey consists of public sports managers (n = 55) and sports club managers (n = 99) who volunteered to participate in the study. Personal Information Form, Sport Managers Self-Efficacy Scale and Time Management Scale were used as data collection tools. In the analysis of data, since the data and groups are not distributed homogeneously and the data is skewed to the left, non-parametric Mann Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis test techniques were used to determine the differences between the groups in the sub-dimensions of self-efficacy and time management, and Spearman Correlation Analysis technique was used in the relationship between Sport Managers' Self-Efficacy Scale and Time Management Scale. At the end of the study, there were no significant differences between Sport Managers Self-Efficacy and Time Management beliefs and Personal variables (age, gender, marital status, education level, year of service, management year and sports history), while a significant difference was determined between the time attitude sub-dimension of time management and the sector variable in favor of sports club managers. In addition, a weak positive and significant (p <0.05) relationship was found between general time management and sports managers' self-efficacy (decision-making, personal characteristics, Knowledge and Interpersonal Roles).

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDOĞAN, A., ŞİRİN, E. F., DOĞAN, P. K., YETİM, A. A. (2020). Examination Of Sport Managers' Self-Efficacy Status And Time Management. Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3, 428–445. https://ajindex.com/articles/206094

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Acuner AM, Sarp N, Çifteli FG, Determining The Agent Factors Related with Time Management of Responsible Doctors and Nurses in Clinics at Ankara University, World Hospitals and Health Services, 42(1), 2006, pp. 26-29
  2. Akatay A, Örgütlerde zaman yönetimi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2003, 10:281-300
  3. Akgül N, Sivas İl Merkezi Birinci Basamak Sağlık Kurumlarında Çalışan Sağlık Personelinin Sağlıklı Yaşam Biçimi Davranışları ve Öz-Etkililik-Yeterlilik Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Anabilimdalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi,2008
  4. Alay S, Koçak S, Üniversite öğrencilerinin zaman yönetimleri ile akademik başarıları arasındaki ilişki, eğitim Yönetimi, 2003, 35, 326-335
  5. Alay S, Koçak S, Validity and reliability of time management questionnaire. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2002, 22, 9–13
  6. Altuntaş EA, Kul M, Karataş İ, Beden Eğitimi Öğretmeni Adaylarının Öğretmenlik Mesleğine İlişkin Tutumları İle Öz Yeterlikleri Arasındaki İlişki, International Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies (IntJCES), 2016, 2 (2),196-215
  7. Ardıç C, “Zaman Yönetimi ve Zaman Yönetiminde Dönüştürücü Liderlerin Davranışlarını Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Araştırma”, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara, 2010
  8. Aşkar P, Umay A, İlköğretim matematik öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin bilgisayarla ilgili öz-yeterlik algısı. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2001, 21,1-8.9. Bahadır Z, Reviewing Emotional Intelligence Levels and Time Management Skills among Students of School of Physical Education and Sports, Journal of Education and Learning, 2018, 7(4), 114-121
  9. Bahçecik N, Öztürk H, Şerbetçi GK, “Yönetici Hemşireler İçin Zaman Yönetimi Ölçeği ve Zaman Yönetimini Etkileyen Faktörler.” Yönetim Dergisi, 2004, 15, 49.11. Bandura A, Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995
  10. Block ME, Hutzler YS, Barak S, Klavina A, Creation and validation of the self-efficacy instrument for physical education teacher education majors toward inclusion. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 2013, 29, 184-205
  11. Boduç N, Hemşirelerde Zaman Yönetimi, İstanbul Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul 2016
  12. Britton, B. K., & Tesser, A. (1991). Effects of time-management practices on college grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 405-410
  13. Bülbül A, Sağlık Çalışan