Journals / International Journal of Medical Biochemistry / 2021 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Investigation of the effect of autoverification on hematology laboratory workflow

Pages
19–24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Autoverification tools should be considered in healthcare management.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of an autoverification process on test turnaround time (TAT), sample rejection rate, and the sample test repetition rate.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Sysmex XN9000 series middleware (Sysmex Corp., Kobe, Japan) was used to perform the autoverification.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Autoverification tools should be considered in healthcare management.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of an autoverification process on test turnaround time (TAT), sample rejection rate, and the sample test repetition rate. Methods: The study was carried out in the core laboratory of İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital. Sysmex XN9000 series middleware (Sysmex Corp., Kobe, Japan) was used to perform the autoverification. The rate of test rejection, test repetition, and TAT of the 3 months preceding use of autoverification were compared with those of a 3-month period following initiation of use of the Sysmex hematology analyzer autoverification process. Results: A total of 612,639 test results of complete blood count profiles performed between January 2019 and March 2019 were collected to determine the distribution intervals. The sample rejection and test repetition rates and the TAT were significantly reduced (21.18%, 49.62%, and 23.9%, respectively) after implementation of the new analyzer. Reflex testing rates, such as peripheral smear and reticulocyte count, were significantly increased. Conclusion: Autoverification improved laboratory performance parameters. The hematology lab workflow benefitted, and the system decreased the sample rejection and test repetition rate, which reduces extra costs like tubes wasted, time spent, and most importantly, an unproductive patient blood draw. Autoverification tools should be considered in healthcare management.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAZEZOĞLU, C. (2021). Investigation of the effect of autoverification on hematology laboratory workflow. International Journal of Medical Biochemistry, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 19–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/205900

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Randell EW, Yenice S, Khine Wamono AA, Orth M. Autoverification of test results in the core clinical laboratory. Clin Biochem 2019
  2. 11−25. [CrossRef] 2. Krasowski MD, Davis SR, Drees D, Morris C, Kulhavy J, Crone C, et al. Autoverification in a core clinical chemistry laboratory at an academic medical center. J Pathol Inform 2014
  3. 5(1):13. 3. Crolla LJ, Westgard JO. Evaluation of rule-based autoverification protocols. Clin Leadersh Manag Rev 2003
  4. 17(5):268−72. 4. Cornet E, Mullier F, Despas N, Jacqmin H, Geara C, Boubaya M, et al. Evaluation and optimization of the extended information process unit (E-IPU) validation module integrating the sysmex flag systems and the recommendations of the Frenchspeaking cellular hematology group (GFHC). Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2016
  5. 76(6):465−71. [CrossRef] 5. Genevieve F G A, Mercier-Bataille D, Wagner-Ballon O. Revue microscopique du frottis sanguin: propositions du Groupe Francophone d'Hématologie Cellulaire (GFHC). Feuill Biol 2014
  6. 7−16. 6. Lou AH, Elnenaei MO, Sadek I, Thompson S, Crocker BD, Nassar BA. Multiple pre- and post-analytical lean approaches to the improvement of the laboratory turnaround time in a large core laboratory. Clin Biochem 2017
  7. 50(15):864−9. [CrossRef] 7. Martinez-Nieto O, Lozano-Gaitán A, Beltrán-Diaz P, MojicaFigueroa I L, Morales-Reyes O L, Isaza-Ruget M A. Autoverification of the automated blood cell counter (CBC) in a reference laboratory in Bogota, Colombia. Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial 2015
  8. 51(6):369−75. [CrossRef] 8. Wang Z, Peng C, Kang H, Fan X, Mu R, Zhou L, et al. Design and evaluation of a LIS-based autoverification system for coagulation assays in a core clinical laboratory. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2019
  9. 19(1):123. [CrossRef] 9. Marquardt B. A step-by-step process to 95% autoverification. Available at: https://www.captodayonline.com/step-by-stepautoverification/. Accessed Nov 20, 2020. 10. X Zhao, XF Wang, JB Wang, XJ Lu, YW Zhao, CB Li, et al. Multicenter study of autoverification methods of hematology analysis. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 2016
  10. 30(2):571–7. 11. Barnes PW, McFadden SL, Machin SJ, Simson E
  11. international consensus group for hematology. The international consensus group for hematology review: suggested criteria for action following automated CBC and WBC differential analysis. Lab Hematol 2005
  12. 11(2):83−90. [CrossRef] 12. Froom P, Barak M. Auto-validation of complete blood counts in an outpatient's regional laboratory. Clin Chem Lab Med