Journals / International Journal of Medical Biochemistry / 2021 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of oxidative stress parameters in patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus: A preliminary study

Pages
14–18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

TAS synthesis may not be sufficient to compensate for this rapid increase in blood glucose.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), also known as adult-onset diabetes, is caused by insulin resistance or insufficient insulin production.
📊
Key Findings & Data:An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and the fasting blood glucose (FBG) level, respectively, are used to determine these 2 prediabetic groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:TAS synthesis may not be sufficient to compensate for this rapid increase in blood glucose.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), also known as adult-onset diabetes, is caused by insulin resistance or insufficient insulin production. Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) indicate blood glucose levels that are higher than normal but not enough to be diagnosed as diabetes. An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and the fasting blood glucose (FBG) level, respectively, are used to determine these 2 prediabetic groups. Oxidative stress is the common pathogenic factor leading to insulin resistance, β-cell dysfunction, IGT, and ultimately to T2DM. This study is an evaluation of the concentration of antioxidant and oxidant parameters of total oxidative status (TOS) and total antioxidant status (TAS) as well as paraoxonase-1 (PON1), and ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) in diabetic and prediabetic patients, and a normoglycemic control group. Methods: Serum TAS, TOS, PON1, IMA were measured in a total of 117 prediabetic, diabetic, and normoglycemic individuals. Results: The TAS was lower in the IGT patient group (2.41±0.2 mmol Trolox Eqv/L) than in the IFG group (2.52±0.18 mmol Trolox Eqv/L) and the normoglycemic control group (2.52±0.18 mmol Trolox Eqv/L) (p=0.03 and p=0.006, respectively). The serum IMA level was found to be significantly different between the T2DM patients (0.70±0.11 ABSU) and the IGT patients (0.77±0.14 ABSU) (p=0.045). There was also a significiant difference in the IMA level between the IGT patients (0.77±0.14 ABSU) and the IFG patients (0.68±0.13 ABSU) (p=0.037). Conclusion: The high IMA and low TAS levels in the IGT patient group may have been a result of the high-glucose solution administered in the OGTT causing an increase in reactive oxygen species synthesis. TAS synthesis may not be sufficient to compensate for this rapid increase in blood glucose.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜCEL, Ç., ÇALCI, E., ONUR, A., OĞUZ, E. F., TURHAN, T., ATEŞ, I. (2021). Comparison of oxidative stress parameters in patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus: A preliminary study. International Journal of Medical Biochemistry, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 14–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/205899

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Cho NH, Shaw JE, Karuranga S, Huang Y, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Ohlrogge AW, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2018;138:271−81. [CrossRef] 2. The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 2003;26(Suppl 1):5−20. [CrossRef] 3. Unwin N, Shaw J, Zimmet P, Alberti KG. Impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glycemia: the current status on definition and intervention. Diabet Med 2002;19(9):708−23. 4. Genuth S, Alberti KG, Bennett P, Buse J, Defronzo R, Kahn R, et al. Follow-up report on the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2003;26(11):3160−7. [CrossRef] 5. Taylor R. Type 2 diabetes: etiology and reversibility. Diabetes Care 2013;36:1047−55. [CrossRef] 6. Ceriello A, Motz E. Is oxidative stress the pathogenic mechanism underlying insulin resistance, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease? The common soil hypothesis revisited. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004;24(5):816−23. [CrossRef] 7. Brownlee M. Biochemistry and molecular cell biology of diabetic complications. Nature 2001;414:813−20. [CrossRef] 8. Circu ML, Aw TY. Reactive oxygen species, cellular redox systems, and apoptosis. Free Radic Biol Med 2010;48(6):749−62. 9. Mackness MI, Arrol S, Durrington PN. Paraoxonase prevents accumulation of lipoperoxides in low-density lipoprotein. FEBS Lett 1991;286(1-2):152−4. [CrossRef] 10. Litvinov D, Mahini H, Garelnabi M. Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Role of Paraoxonase 1: Implication in Arteriosclerosis Diseases. N Am J Med Sci 2012;4(11):523−32. [CrossRef] 11. Sozer V, Himmetoglu S, Korkmaz GG, Kaya S, Aydın S, Yumuk V, et al. Paraoxonase, oxidized low density lipoprotein, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and adhesion molecules are associated with macrovascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Minerva Med 2014;105(3):237−44. 12. Awadallah SM, Atoum MF, Nimer NA, Saleh SA. Ischemia modified albumin: an oxidative stress marker in b-thalassemia major. Clin Chim Acta 2012;413(9-10):907−10. [CrossRef] 13. Liyan C, Jie Z, Yonghua W, Xiaozhou H. Assay of ischemiamodified albumin and C-reactive protein for early diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes. J Clin Lab Anal 2008;22(1):45−9. 14. Erel O. A new automated colorimetric method for measuring total oxidant status. Clin Biochem 2005;38(12):1103−11. [C