Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 3

Tracheostomy in Children: Experience of a Tertiary Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Pages
281–286
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is a cost-effective method that can be implemented easily and safely by families with different social and cultural levels with good education.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: In this study, we aimed to share the characteristics, results and experiences of the patients who underwent tracheostomy in our tertiary pediatric intensive care unit and who were admitted to home monitoring program after discharge.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The medical records of patients who underwent tracheostomy at the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit of Medeniyet University, Göztepe Training and Research Hospital between May 2015 and June 2019 and followed up at home monitoring program after family education were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is a cost-effective method that can be implemented easily and safely by families with different social and cultural levels with good education.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Introduction: In this study, we aimed to share the characteristics, results and experiences of the patients who underwent tracheostomy in our tertiary pediatric intensive care unit and who were admitted to home monitoring program after discharge. Methods: The medical records of patients who underwent tracheostomy at the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit of Medeniyet University, Göztepe Training and Research Hospital between May 2015 and June 2019 and followed up at home monitoring program after family education were retrospectively analyzed. Results: A total of 47 patients 30 male (63.8%) and 17 female (36.2%) who met the criteria were included in the study. The median age on the day of tracheostomy was 33 months (range, 2-205), length of stay in the intensive care unit was median 66 days (range, 15-174), and the median follow-up after discharge was 845 days (range, 60-1520). The most common cause of tracheostomy was multiple trauma with 17 patients (36.2%). Seventeen (36.2%) of the patients were discharged with a home mechanical ventilator, while 30 (63.8%) were discharged without a home mechanical ventilator. Female sex and home discharge with home ventilator support adversely affected survival (p=0.01, p=0.019). Discussion and Conclusion: Tracheostomy and home mechanical ventilation is a good option for reducing the burden of chronic care patients in our country where the number of pediatric intensive care beds is limited. It is a cost-effective method that can be implemented easily and safely by families with different social and cultural levels with good education.

🔖

Cite This Article

DUYU, M. (2019). Tracheostomy in Children: Experience of a Tertiary Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, Cilt: 59 - Sayı: 3, 281–286. https://ajindex.com/articles/205890

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Amirnovin R, Aghamohammadi S, Riley C, Woo MS, Del Castillo S. Analysis of a Pediatric Home Mechanical Ventilator Population. Respir Care 2018;63:558–64
  2. Ottonello G, Ferrari I, Pirroddi IM, Diana MC, Villa G, Nahum L, et al. Home mechanical ventilation in children: retrospective survey of a pediatric population. Pediatr Int 2007;49:801–5
  3. Graf JM, Montagnino BA, Hueckel R, McPherson ML. Pediatric tracheostomies: a recent experience from oneacademic center. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2008;9:96–100
  4. Berry JG, Graham RJ, Roberson DW, Rhein L, Graham DA, Zhou J, et al. Patient characteristics associated with in-hospital mortality in children following tracheotomy. Arch Dis Child 2010;95:703–10
  5. Kremer B, Botos-Kremer AI, Eckel HE, Schlöndorff G. Indications, complications, and surgical techniques for pediatric tracheostomies-- an update. J Pediatr Surg 2002;37:1556–62
  6. Durbin CG Jr. Tracheostomy: why, when, and how? Respir Care 2010;55:1056–68
  7. Berry JG, Graham DA, Graham RJ, Zhou J, Putney HL, O'Brien JE, et al. Predictors of clinical outcomes and hospital resource use of children after tracheotomy. Pediatrics 2009;124:563– 72
  8. Sritippayawan S, Kun SS, Keens TG, Davidson Ward SL. Initiation of home mechanical ventilation in children with neuromuscular diseases. J Pediatr 2003;142:481–5
  9. Sakakihara Y, Yamanaka T, Kajii M, Kamoshita S. Long-term ventilator-assisted children in Japan: a national survey. Acta Paediatr Jpn 1996;38:137–42
  10. Amin R, Sayal P, Syed F, Chaves A, Moraes TJ, MacLusky I. Pediatric long-term home mechanical ventilation: twenty years of follow-up from one Canadian center. Pediatr Pulmonol 2014;49:816–24
  11. Canlas-Yamsuan M, Sanchez I, Kesselman M, Chernick V. Morbidity and mortality patterns of ventilator-dependent children in a home care program. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1993;32:706–13
  12. Fraser J, Henrichsen T, Mok Q, Tasker RC. Prolonged mechanical ventilation as a consequence of acute illness. Arch Dis Child 1998;78:253–6
  13. Lloyd-Owen SJ, Donaldson GC, Ambrosino N, Escarabill J, Farre R, Fauroux B, et al. Patterns of home mechanical ventilation use in Europe: results from the Eurovent survey. Eur Respir J 2005;25:1025–31
  14. Wallis C, Paton JY, Beaton S, Jardine E. Children on long-term ventilatory support: 10 years of progress. Arch Dis Child 2011;96:998–1002
  15. Oktem S, Ersu R, Uyan ZS, Cakir E, Karakoc F, Karadag B, et al. Home ventilation for children with chronic respiratory failure in Istanbul. Resp